Interpersonal process and outcome in variants of cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy

Kenneth L. Critchfield, William P. Henry, Louis G. Castonguay, Thomas D. Borkovec

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

Early sessions from three variants of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) were examined to replicate work done in psychodynamic-interpersonal treatments linking interpersonal process to outcome (W. P. Henry, T. E. Schacht, & H. H. Strupp, 1986, 1990). Cases were available from a component study of CBT for generalized anxiety disorder (T. D. Borkovec, M. G. Newman, A. L. Pincus, & R. Lytle, 2002) and were selected to form good and poor outcome groups maintained through a 1-year follow-up. A third group was also examined that had initial positive outcomes and marked decline by follow-up (n = 8 for each). Structural analysis of social behavior (SASB) was used to identify interpersonal behaviors. Contrary to the authors' expectation, SASB variables were not strong predictors of outcome, and lower levels of interpersonal hostility were found than was the case in previous work. Findings are discussed in light of differences observed between treatment variants and the role that manuals may have in standardizing some aspects of the therapeutic relationship.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-51
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of clinical psychology
Volume63
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2007

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Clinical Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Interpersonal process and outcome in variants of cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this