TY - JOUR
T1 - INTERPRETING FLUX from BROADBAND PHOTOMETRY
AU - Brown, Peter J.
AU - Breeveld, Alice
AU - Roming, Peter W.A.
AU - Siegel, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved..
PY - 2016/10
Y1 - 2016/10
N2 - We discuss the transformation of observed photometry into flux for the creation of spectral energy distributions (SED) and the computation of bolometric luminosities. We do this in the context of supernova studies, particularly as observed with the Swift spacecraft, but the concepts and techniques should be applicable to many other types of sources and wavelength regimes. Traditional methods of converting observed magnitudes to flux densities are not very accurate when applied to UV photometry. Common methods for extinction and the integration of pseudo-bolometric fluxes can also lead to inaccurate results. The sources of inaccuracy, though, also apply to other wavelengths. Because of the complicated nature of translating broadband photometry into monochromatic flux densities, comparison between observed photometry and a spectroscopic model is best done by forward modeling the spectrum into the count rates or magnitudes of the observations. We recommend that integrated flux measurements be made using a spectrum or SED which is consistent with the multi-band photometry rather than converting individual photometric measurements to flux densities, linearly interpolating between the points, and integrating. We also highlight some specific areas where the UV flux can be mischaracterized.
AB - We discuss the transformation of observed photometry into flux for the creation of spectral energy distributions (SED) and the computation of bolometric luminosities. We do this in the context of supernova studies, particularly as observed with the Swift spacecraft, but the concepts and techniques should be applicable to many other types of sources and wavelength regimes. Traditional methods of converting observed magnitudes to flux densities are not very accurate when applied to UV photometry. Common methods for extinction and the integration of pseudo-bolometric fluxes can also lead to inaccurate results. The sources of inaccuracy, though, also apply to other wavelengths. Because of the complicated nature of translating broadband photometry into monochromatic flux densities, comparison between observed photometry and a spectroscopic model is best done by forward modeling the spectrum into the count rates or magnitudes of the observations. We recommend that integrated flux measurements be made using a spectrum or SED which is consistent with the multi-band photometry rather than converting individual photometric measurements to flux densities, linearly interpolating between the points, and integrating. We also highlight some specific areas where the UV flux can be mischaracterized.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991704953&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991704953&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3847/0004-6256/152/4/102
DO - 10.3847/0004-6256/152/4/102
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84991704953
SN - 0004-6256
VL - 152
JO - Astronomical Journal
JF - Astronomical Journal
IS - 4
M1 - 102
ER -