Interpreting spatial patterns: An inquiry into formal and cognitive aspects of Tobler's first law of geography

Alexander Klippel, Frank Hardisty, Rui Li

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The characterization, identification, and understanding of spatial patterns are central concerns of geography. Deeply rooted in the notion that geographic locationmatters, one testable assumption is that near things aremore related than distant things-a concept often referred to as Tobler's first law of geography.One means of quantifying this assumption is using measures of spatial autocorrelation. Several such measures have been developed to test whether a pattern is indeed clustered, or dispersed, or whether it is, from a statistical perspective, random. To shed light on how spatial patterns are understood from a cognitive perspective, this article reports results from studies of spatial pattern interpretation represented in maps. For the purpose of experimental validation, we used a two-color map. We systematically varied the ratio of the colors as well as the level of significance of clustering and dispersion; we targeted two groups: experts and nonexperts. The task for both experts and nonexperts was to sort patterns according to five specified categories of spatial autocorrelation structures. The results show clearly that patterns are understood on the basis of the dominant color, by both experts and nonexperts. A third experiment, using a free classification paradigm, confirmed the dominance of the color effect. These results are important, as they point to critical aspects of pattern perception and understanding that need to be addressed from the perspective of spatial thinking, especially how people relate concepts of randomness with spatial patterns (represented in maps).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1011-1031
Number of pages21
JournalAnnals of the Association of American Geographers
Volume101
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2011

Fingerprint

expert
geography
Law
autocorrelation
paradigm
interpretation
experiment
Group
test
effect

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Earth-Surface Processes

Cite this

@article{8b9cc5143f664b1e9bc9568ecaf16163,
title = "Interpreting spatial patterns: An inquiry into formal and cognitive aspects of Tobler's first law of geography",
abstract = "The characterization, identification, and understanding of spatial patterns are central concerns of geography. Deeply rooted in the notion that geographic locationmatters, one testable assumption is that near things aremore related than distant things-a concept often referred to as Tobler's first law of geography.One means of quantifying this assumption is using measures of spatial autocorrelation. Several such measures have been developed to test whether a pattern is indeed clustered, or dispersed, or whether it is, from a statistical perspective, random. To shed light on how spatial patterns are understood from a cognitive perspective, this article reports results from studies of spatial pattern interpretation represented in maps. For the purpose of experimental validation, we used a two-color map. We systematically varied the ratio of the colors as well as the level of significance of clustering and dispersion; we targeted two groups: experts and nonexperts. The task for both experts and nonexperts was to sort patterns according to five specified categories of spatial autocorrelation structures. The results show clearly that patterns are understood on the basis of the dominant color, by both experts and nonexperts. A third experiment, using a free classification paradigm, confirmed the dominance of the color effect. These results are important, as they point to critical aspects of pattern perception and understanding that need to be addressed from the perspective of spatial thinking, especially how people relate concepts of randomness with spatial patterns (represented in maps).",
author = "Alexander Klippel and Frank Hardisty and Rui Li",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/00045608.2011.577364",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
pages = "1011--1031",
journal = "Annals of the American Association of Geographers",
issn = "2469-4452",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

Interpreting spatial patterns : An inquiry into formal and cognitive aspects of Tobler's first law of geography. / Klippel, Alexander; Hardisty, Frank; Li, Rui.

In: Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 101, No. 5, 01.09.2011, p. 1011-1031.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interpreting spatial patterns

T2 - An inquiry into formal and cognitive aspects of Tobler's first law of geography

AU - Klippel, Alexander

AU - Hardisty, Frank

AU - Li, Rui

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - The characterization, identification, and understanding of spatial patterns are central concerns of geography. Deeply rooted in the notion that geographic locationmatters, one testable assumption is that near things aremore related than distant things-a concept often referred to as Tobler's first law of geography.One means of quantifying this assumption is using measures of spatial autocorrelation. Several such measures have been developed to test whether a pattern is indeed clustered, or dispersed, or whether it is, from a statistical perspective, random. To shed light on how spatial patterns are understood from a cognitive perspective, this article reports results from studies of spatial pattern interpretation represented in maps. For the purpose of experimental validation, we used a two-color map. We systematically varied the ratio of the colors as well as the level of significance of clustering and dispersion; we targeted two groups: experts and nonexperts. The task for both experts and nonexperts was to sort patterns according to five specified categories of spatial autocorrelation structures. The results show clearly that patterns are understood on the basis of the dominant color, by both experts and nonexperts. A third experiment, using a free classification paradigm, confirmed the dominance of the color effect. These results are important, as they point to critical aspects of pattern perception and understanding that need to be addressed from the perspective of spatial thinking, especially how people relate concepts of randomness with spatial patterns (represented in maps).

AB - The characterization, identification, and understanding of spatial patterns are central concerns of geography. Deeply rooted in the notion that geographic locationmatters, one testable assumption is that near things aremore related than distant things-a concept often referred to as Tobler's first law of geography.One means of quantifying this assumption is using measures of spatial autocorrelation. Several such measures have been developed to test whether a pattern is indeed clustered, or dispersed, or whether it is, from a statistical perspective, random. To shed light on how spatial patterns are understood from a cognitive perspective, this article reports results from studies of spatial pattern interpretation represented in maps. For the purpose of experimental validation, we used a two-color map. We systematically varied the ratio of the colors as well as the level of significance of clustering and dispersion; we targeted two groups: experts and nonexperts. The task for both experts and nonexperts was to sort patterns according to five specified categories of spatial autocorrelation structures. The results show clearly that patterns are understood on the basis of the dominant color, by both experts and nonexperts. A third experiment, using a free classification paradigm, confirmed the dominance of the color effect. These results are important, as they point to critical aspects of pattern perception and understanding that need to be addressed from the perspective of spatial thinking, especially how people relate concepts of randomness with spatial patterns (represented in maps).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79961003598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79961003598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00045608.2011.577364

DO - 10.1080/00045608.2011.577364

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79961003598

VL - 101

SP - 1011

EP - 1031

JO - Annals of the American Association of Geographers

JF - Annals of the American Association of Geographers

SN - 2469-4452

IS - 5

ER -