Interrogating empirical-statistical downscaling

B. C. Hewitson, J. Daron, Robert George Crane, M. F. Zermoglio, C. Jack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

51 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The delivery of downscaled climate information is increasingly seen as a vehicle of climate services, a driver for impacts studies and adaptation decisions, and for informing policy development. Empirical-statistical downscaling (ESD) is widely used; however, the accompanying responsibility is significant, and predicated on effective understanding of the limitations and capabilities of ESD methods. There remain substantial contradictions, uncertainties, and sensitivity to assumptions between the different methods commonly used. Yet providing decision-relevant downscaled climate projections to help support national and local adaptation is core to the growing global momentum seeking to operationalize what is, in effect, still foundational research. We argue that any downscaled climate information must address the criteria of being plausible, defensible and actionable. Climate scientists cannot absolve themselves of their ethical responsibility when informing adaptation and must, therefore, be diligent in ensuring any information provided adequately addresses these three criteria. Frameworks for supporting such assessment are not well developed. We interrogate the conceptual foundations of statistical downscaling methodologies and their assumptions, and articulate a framework for evaluating and integrating downscaling output into the wider landscape of climate information. For ESD there are key criteria that need to be satisfied to underpin the credibility of the derived product. Assessing these criteria requires the use of appropriate metrics to test the comprehensive treatment of local climate response to large-scale forcing, and to compare across methods. We illustrate the potential consequences of methodological choices on the interpretation of downscaling results and explore the purposes, benefits and limitations of using statistical downscaling.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)539-554
Number of pages16
JournalClimatic Change
Volume122
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2014

Fingerprint

downscaling
climate
local adaptation
policy development
momentum
methodology
method

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Hewitson, B. C., Daron, J., Crane, R. G., Zermoglio, M. F., & Jack, C. (2014). Interrogating empirical-statistical downscaling. Climatic Change, 122(4), 539-554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1021-z
Hewitson, B. C. ; Daron, J. ; Crane, Robert George ; Zermoglio, M. F. ; Jack, C. / Interrogating empirical-statistical downscaling. In: Climatic Change. 2014 ; Vol. 122, No. 4. pp. 539-554.
@article{a4e7d9be2ec443fab12cc76465a72555,
title = "Interrogating empirical-statistical downscaling",
abstract = "The delivery of downscaled climate information is increasingly seen as a vehicle of climate services, a driver for impacts studies and adaptation decisions, and for informing policy development. Empirical-statistical downscaling (ESD) is widely used; however, the accompanying responsibility is significant, and predicated on effective understanding of the limitations and capabilities of ESD methods. There remain substantial contradictions, uncertainties, and sensitivity to assumptions between the different methods commonly used. Yet providing decision-relevant downscaled climate projections to help support national and local adaptation is core to the growing global momentum seeking to operationalize what is, in effect, still foundational research. We argue that any downscaled climate information must address the criteria of being plausible, defensible and actionable. Climate scientists cannot absolve themselves of their ethical responsibility when informing adaptation and must, therefore, be diligent in ensuring any information provided adequately addresses these three criteria. Frameworks for supporting such assessment are not well developed. We interrogate the conceptual foundations of statistical downscaling methodologies and their assumptions, and articulate a framework for evaluating and integrating downscaling output into the wider landscape of climate information. For ESD there are key criteria that need to be satisfied to underpin the credibility of the derived product. Assessing these criteria requires the use of appropriate metrics to test the comprehensive treatment of local climate response to large-scale forcing, and to compare across methods. We illustrate the potential consequences of methodological choices on the interpretation of downscaling results and explore the purposes, benefits and limitations of using statistical downscaling.",
author = "Hewitson, {B. C.} and J. Daron and Crane, {Robert George} and Zermoglio, {M. F.} and C. Jack",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10584-013-1021-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "122",
pages = "539--554",
journal = "Climatic Change",
issn = "0165-0009",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

Hewitson, BC, Daron, J, Crane, RG, Zermoglio, MF & Jack, C 2014, 'Interrogating empirical-statistical downscaling', Climatic Change, vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 539-554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1021-z

Interrogating empirical-statistical downscaling. / Hewitson, B. C.; Daron, J.; Crane, Robert George; Zermoglio, M. F.; Jack, C.

In: Climatic Change, Vol. 122, No. 4, 01.02.2014, p. 539-554.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interrogating empirical-statistical downscaling

AU - Hewitson, B. C.

AU - Daron, J.

AU - Crane, Robert George

AU - Zermoglio, M. F.

AU - Jack, C.

PY - 2014/2/1

Y1 - 2014/2/1

N2 - The delivery of downscaled climate information is increasingly seen as a vehicle of climate services, a driver for impacts studies and adaptation decisions, and for informing policy development. Empirical-statistical downscaling (ESD) is widely used; however, the accompanying responsibility is significant, and predicated on effective understanding of the limitations and capabilities of ESD methods. There remain substantial contradictions, uncertainties, and sensitivity to assumptions between the different methods commonly used. Yet providing decision-relevant downscaled climate projections to help support national and local adaptation is core to the growing global momentum seeking to operationalize what is, in effect, still foundational research. We argue that any downscaled climate information must address the criteria of being plausible, defensible and actionable. Climate scientists cannot absolve themselves of their ethical responsibility when informing adaptation and must, therefore, be diligent in ensuring any information provided adequately addresses these three criteria. Frameworks for supporting such assessment are not well developed. We interrogate the conceptual foundations of statistical downscaling methodologies and their assumptions, and articulate a framework for evaluating and integrating downscaling output into the wider landscape of climate information. For ESD there are key criteria that need to be satisfied to underpin the credibility of the derived product. Assessing these criteria requires the use of appropriate metrics to test the comprehensive treatment of local climate response to large-scale forcing, and to compare across methods. We illustrate the potential consequences of methodological choices on the interpretation of downscaling results and explore the purposes, benefits and limitations of using statistical downscaling.

AB - The delivery of downscaled climate information is increasingly seen as a vehicle of climate services, a driver for impacts studies and adaptation decisions, and for informing policy development. Empirical-statistical downscaling (ESD) is widely used; however, the accompanying responsibility is significant, and predicated on effective understanding of the limitations and capabilities of ESD methods. There remain substantial contradictions, uncertainties, and sensitivity to assumptions between the different methods commonly used. Yet providing decision-relevant downscaled climate projections to help support national and local adaptation is core to the growing global momentum seeking to operationalize what is, in effect, still foundational research. We argue that any downscaled climate information must address the criteria of being plausible, defensible and actionable. Climate scientists cannot absolve themselves of their ethical responsibility when informing adaptation and must, therefore, be diligent in ensuring any information provided adequately addresses these three criteria. Frameworks for supporting such assessment are not well developed. We interrogate the conceptual foundations of statistical downscaling methodologies and their assumptions, and articulate a framework for evaluating and integrating downscaling output into the wider landscape of climate information. For ESD there are key criteria that need to be satisfied to underpin the credibility of the derived product. Assessing these criteria requires the use of appropriate metrics to test the comprehensive treatment of local climate response to large-scale forcing, and to compare across methods. We illustrate the potential consequences of methodological choices on the interpretation of downscaling results and explore the purposes, benefits and limitations of using statistical downscaling.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906270352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906270352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10584-013-1021-z

DO - 10.1007/s10584-013-1021-z

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84906270352

VL - 122

SP - 539

EP - 554

JO - Climatic Change

JF - Climatic Change

SN - 0165-0009

IS - 4

ER -