Interrupted presidencies in third wave democracies

Young Hun Kim, Donna Bahry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since 1974, popularly elected presidents in a number of Third Wave democracies have resigned or been removed from office, casting doubt on classic assumptions about the inflexibility of presidential terms. Accounting for this pattern of interruptions has been difficult, however, since some cross-national studies rely on limited samples and some yield conflicting results. We reexamine the sources of presidential interruptions in new democracies from 1974 through 2003. We find several factors that increase presidential vulnerability: lack of partisan resources in congress, a low share of the first-round vote, an imbalance in presidential power, a declining economy, and public mobilization against the incumbent. We also find that presidential survival is separate from democratic survival in most regions of the world. Presidents may fall, but democratic governments usually continue. Democratically elected presidents in sub-Saharan Africa, however, tend to be removed by force, with the result that democracy itself is more likely to be suspended.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)807-822
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Politics
Volume70
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2008

Fingerprint

president
democracy
mobilization
voter
vulnerability
economy
lack
resources

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Kim, Young Hun ; Bahry, Donna. / Interrupted presidencies in third wave democracies. In: Journal of Politics. 2008 ; Vol. 70, No. 3. pp. 807-822.
@article{4efb16f7d3744c2dbce2602078c0922a,
title = "Interrupted presidencies in third wave democracies",
abstract = "Since 1974, popularly elected presidents in a number of Third Wave democracies have resigned or been removed from office, casting doubt on classic assumptions about the inflexibility of presidential terms. Accounting for this pattern of interruptions has been difficult, however, since some cross-national studies rely on limited samples and some yield conflicting results. We reexamine the sources of presidential interruptions in new democracies from 1974 through 2003. We find several factors that increase presidential vulnerability: lack of partisan resources in congress, a low share of the first-round vote, an imbalance in presidential power, a declining economy, and public mobilization against the incumbent. We also find that presidential survival is separate from democratic survival in most regions of the world. Presidents may fall, but democratic governments usually continue. Democratically elected presidents in sub-Saharan Africa, however, tend to be removed by force, with the result that democracy itself is more likely to be suspended.",
author = "Kim, {Young Hun} and Donna Bahry",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0022381608080778",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "807--822",
journal = "Journal of Politics",
issn = "0022-3816",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

Interrupted presidencies in third wave democracies. / Kim, Young Hun; Bahry, Donna.

In: Journal of Politics, Vol. 70, No. 3, 01.07.2008, p. 807-822.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interrupted presidencies in third wave democracies

AU - Kim, Young Hun

AU - Bahry, Donna

PY - 2008/7/1

Y1 - 2008/7/1

N2 - Since 1974, popularly elected presidents in a number of Third Wave democracies have resigned or been removed from office, casting doubt on classic assumptions about the inflexibility of presidential terms. Accounting for this pattern of interruptions has been difficult, however, since some cross-national studies rely on limited samples and some yield conflicting results. We reexamine the sources of presidential interruptions in new democracies from 1974 through 2003. We find several factors that increase presidential vulnerability: lack of partisan resources in congress, a low share of the first-round vote, an imbalance in presidential power, a declining economy, and public mobilization against the incumbent. We also find that presidential survival is separate from democratic survival in most regions of the world. Presidents may fall, but democratic governments usually continue. Democratically elected presidents in sub-Saharan Africa, however, tend to be removed by force, with the result that democracy itself is more likely to be suspended.

AB - Since 1974, popularly elected presidents in a number of Third Wave democracies have resigned or been removed from office, casting doubt on classic assumptions about the inflexibility of presidential terms. Accounting for this pattern of interruptions has been difficult, however, since some cross-national studies rely on limited samples and some yield conflicting results. We reexamine the sources of presidential interruptions in new democracies from 1974 through 2003. We find several factors that increase presidential vulnerability: lack of partisan resources in congress, a low share of the first-round vote, an imbalance in presidential power, a declining economy, and public mobilization against the incumbent. We also find that presidential survival is separate from democratic survival in most regions of the world. Presidents may fall, but democratic governments usually continue. Democratically elected presidents in sub-Saharan Africa, however, tend to be removed by force, with the result that democracy itself is more likely to be suspended.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=46949093855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=46949093855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0022381608080778

DO - 10.1017/S0022381608080778

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:46949093855

VL - 70

SP - 807

EP - 822

JO - Journal of Politics

JF - Journal of Politics

SN - 0022-3816

IS - 3

ER -