Interspecies reproduction: Xenogenic desire and the feminist implications of hybrids

Susan Merrill Squier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article explores the image of interspecies reproduction, arguably the most disturbing of the range of contemporary images of reproductive technology, as both a metaphor of some historical standing and as a new, and troubling, medical/scientific capability. Moving from the 1994 report of the Human Embryo Research Panel of the NIH, also known as the Muller Panel, through a range of sites - natural history, popular science writing, social critique, fiction, feminist theory and science studies - the article explores the context in which our current scientific perspective on interspecies reproduction is constructed. The study demonstrates the value of contextualizing - both in terms of history and literature - even the most seemingly transparent scientific or medical intervention, in order to achieve the fullest understanding of its implications. A concluding consideration of the philosophical/theoretical construction of interspecies reproduction in the present (postmodern) moment explores its implications for our understanding of the feminist critique of science.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)360-381
Number of pages22
JournalCultural Studies
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cultural Studies
  • Anthropology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Interspecies reproduction: Xenogenic desire and the feminist implications of hybrids'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this