Intraoperative conversion from partial to radical nephrectomy at a single institution from 2003 to 2008

David J. Galvin, Caroline J. Savage, Ari Adamy, Matthew G. Kaag, Matthew F. O'Brien, George Kallingal, Paul Russo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Little information exists on conversion from partial to radical nephrectomy. We assessed the intraoperative reasons and predictive factors for conversion in a contemporary series of patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. Materials and Methods: We identified all patients at our institution who underwent open or laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with conversion to radical nephrectomy between 2003 and 2008. Renal function was assessed by the glomerular filtration rate using the modification of diet in renal disease equation. We used logistic regression analysis to determine whether tumor site, tumor size, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, age or gender was associated with the conversion risk. Results: The rate of conversion to radical nephrectomy was 6% (61 of 1,029 patients). In the open partial nephrectomy group 59 of 865 cases (7%, 95% CI 5-9) and in the laparoscopic partial nephrectomy group 2 of 164 (1.2%, 95% CI 0.01-4) were converted. The most common reasons for conversion were invasion of hilar structures, size discrepancy and insufficient residual kidney. Patients with conversion were more likely to have larger tumors (per 1 cm increase OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.24-1.59), a central site (central vs peripheral OR 7.74, 95% CI 3.98-15) and a lower preoperative glomerular filtration rate (per 10 ml/minute/1.73 m 2 OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.67-0.91), and present with symptoms (any vs none OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.54-5.04) than those without conversion. The median postoperative glomerular filtration rate was 46 vs 61 ml/minute/1.73 m 2 in patients with vs without conversion. Conclusions: Conversion to radical nephrectomy was rare in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy in this series. Increasing tumor size, central site, lower preoperative glomerular filtration rate and symptoms at presentation were associated with an increased risk of conversion, which increases the likelihood of chronic kidney disease postoperatively.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1204-1209
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume185
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2011

Fingerprint

Nephrectomy
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Kidney
Neoplasms
Diet Therapy
Chronic Renal Insufficiency
Body Mass Index
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Urology

Cite this

Galvin, David J. ; Savage, Caroline J. ; Adamy, Ari ; Kaag, Matthew G. ; O'Brien, Matthew F. ; Kallingal, George ; Russo, Paul. / Intraoperative conversion from partial to radical nephrectomy at a single institution from 2003 to 2008. In: Journal of Urology. 2011 ; Vol. 185, No. 4. pp. 1204-1209.
@article{321d8c0345c74f6f9cf5df9a37d59b1e,
title = "Intraoperative conversion from partial to radical nephrectomy at a single institution from 2003 to 2008",
abstract = "Purpose: Little information exists on conversion from partial to radical nephrectomy. We assessed the intraoperative reasons and predictive factors for conversion in a contemporary series of patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. Materials and Methods: We identified all patients at our institution who underwent open or laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with conversion to radical nephrectomy between 2003 and 2008. Renal function was assessed by the glomerular filtration rate using the modification of diet in renal disease equation. We used logistic regression analysis to determine whether tumor site, tumor size, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, age or gender was associated with the conversion risk. Results: The rate of conversion to radical nephrectomy was 6{\%} (61 of 1,029 patients). In the open partial nephrectomy group 59 of 865 cases (7{\%}, 95{\%} CI 5-9) and in the laparoscopic partial nephrectomy group 2 of 164 (1.2{\%}, 95{\%} CI 0.01-4) were converted. The most common reasons for conversion were invasion of hilar structures, size discrepancy and insufficient residual kidney. Patients with conversion were more likely to have larger tumors (per 1 cm increase OR 1.41, 95{\%} CI 1.24-1.59), a central site (central vs peripheral OR 7.74, 95{\%} CI 3.98-15) and a lower preoperative glomerular filtration rate (per 10 ml/minute/1.73 m 2 OR 0.78, 95{\%} CI 0.67-0.91), and present with symptoms (any vs none OR 2.78, 95{\%} CI 1.54-5.04) than those without conversion. The median postoperative glomerular filtration rate was 46 vs 61 ml/minute/1.73 m 2 in patients with vs without conversion. Conclusions: Conversion to radical nephrectomy was rare in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy in this series. Increasing tumor size, central site, lower preoperative glomerular filtration rate and symptoms at presentation were associated with an increased risk of conversion, which increases the likelihood of chronic kidney disease postoperatively.",
author = "Galvin, {David J.} and Savage, {Caroline J.} and Ari Adamy and Kaag, {Matthew G.} and O'Brien, {Matthew F.} and George Kallingal and Paul Russo",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.077",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "185",
pages = "1204--1209",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Intraoperative conversion from partial to radical nephrectomy at a single institution from 2003 to 2008. / Galvin, David J.; Savage, Caroline J.; Adamy, Ari; Kaag, Matthew G.; O'Brien, Matthew F.; Kallingal, George; Russo, Paul.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 185, No. 4, 01.04.2011, p. 1204-1209.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intraoperative conversion from partial to radical nephrectomy at a single institution from 2003 to 2008

AU - Galvin, David J.

AU - Savage, Caroline J.

AU - Adamy, Ari

AU - Kaag, Matthew G.

AU - O'Brien, Matthew F.

AU - Kallingal, George

AU - Russo, Paul

PY - 2011/4/1

Y1 - 2011/4/1

N2 - Purpose: Little information exists on conversion from partial to radical nephrectomy. We assessed the intraoperative reasons and predictive factors for conversion in a contemporary series of patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. Materials and Methods: We identified all patients at our institution who underwent open or laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with conversion to radical nephrectomy between 2003 and 2008. Renal function was assessed by the glomerular filtration rate using the modification of diet in renal disease equation. We used logistic regression analysis to determine whether tumor site, tumor size, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, age or gender was associated with the conversion risk. Results: The rate of conversion to radical nephrectomy was 6% (61 of 1,029 patients). In the open partial nephrectomy group 59 of 865 cases (7%, 95% CI 5-9) and in the laparoscopic partial nephrectomy group 2 of 164 (1.2%, 95% CI 0.01-4) were converted. The most common reasons for conversion were invasion of hilar structures, size discrepancy and insufficient residual kidney. Patients with conversion were more likely to have larger tumors (per 1 cm increase OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.24-1.59), a central site (central vs peripheral OR 7.74, 95% CI 3.98-15) and a lower preoperative glomerular filtration rate (per 10 ml/minute/1.73 m 2 OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.67-0.91), and present with symptoms (any vs none OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.54-5.04) than those without conversion. The median postoperative glomerular filtration rate was 46 vs 61 ml/minute/1.73 m 2 in patients with vs without conversion. Conclusions: Conversion to radical nephrectomy was rare in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy in this series. Increasing tumor size, central site, lower preoperative glomerular filtration rate and symptoms at presentation were associated with an increased risk of conversion, which increases the likelihood of chronic kidney disease postoperatively.

AB - Purpose: Little information exists on conversion from partial to radical nephrectomy. We assessed the intraoperative reasons and predictive factors for conversion in a contemporary series of patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. Materials and Methods: We identified all patients at our institution who underwent open or laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with conversion to radical nephrectomy between 2003 and 2008. Renal function was assessed by the glomerular filtration rate using the modification of diet in renal disease equation. We used logistic regression analysis to determine whether tumor site, tumor size, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, age or gender was associated with the conversion risk. Results: The rate of conversion to radical nephrectomy was 6% (61 of 1,029 patients). In the open partial nephrectomy group 59 of 865 cases (7%, 95% CI 5-9) and in the laparoscopic partial nephrectomy group 2 of 164 (1.2%, 95% CI 0.01-4) were converted. The most common reasons for conversion were invasion of hilar structures, size discrepancy and insufficient residual kidney. Patients with conversion were more likely to have larger tumors (per 1 cm increase OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.24-1.59), a central site (central vs peripheral OR 7.74, 95% CI 3.98-15) and a lower preoperative glomerular filtration rate (per 10 ml/minute/1.73 m 2 OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.67-0.91), and present with symptoms (any vs none OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.54-5.04) than those without conversion. The median postoperative glomerular filtration rate was 46 vs 61 ml/minute/1.73 m 2 in patients with vs without conversion. Conclusions: Conversion to radical nephrectomy was rare in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy in this series. Increasing tumor size, central site, lower preoperative glomerular filtration rate and symptoms at presentation were associated with an increased risk of conversion, which increases the likelihood of chronic kidney disease postoperatively.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952701615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952701615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.077

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.077

M3 - Article

C2 - 21334022

AN - SCOPUS:79952701615

VL - 185

SP - 1204

EP - 1209

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 4

ER -