Intratextual persuasive messages as catalysts for higherorder thinking

An exploratory investigation

Pricilla Karen Murphy, Andria Andiliou, Carla M. Firetto, Carissa M. Bowersox, Markus Baker, Crystal M. Ramsay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Facilitating students’ acquisition of higherorder thinking skills is imperative in the 21st century. Although some types of text have been shown to enhance higherorder thinking, the effects of many novel forms of text have yet to be investigated. As such, the purpose of the present study was to explore the extent to which a relatively novel form of text (i.e., intratextual persuasive message) served as a catalyst for students’ higherorder thinking as evidenced in the quantity, quality, and content of their arguments before and after reading. The findings revealed that the quantity of students’ arguments increased from prereading to postreading and the content of the reasons provided by the students was more in line with those of the authors, whereas the quality of students’ arguments decreased over time. Interestingly, relatively few students altered their position on the central question from the text. Rather, the nature of the data indicated that students engaged in case-building as they read the text. As a result, the intratextual persuasive message was only minimally effective at enhancing students’ higherorder thinking. Implications for research and practice are forwarded.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)134-163
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Literacy Research
Volume48
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

student
21st Century

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Murphy, Pricilla Karen ; Andiliou, Andria ; Firetto, Carla M. ; Bowersox, Carissa M. ; Baker, Markus ; Ramsay, Crystal M. / Intratextual persuasive messages as catalysts for higherorder thinking : An exploratory investigation. In: Journal of Literacy Research. 2016 ; Vol. 48, No. 2. pp. 134-163.
@article{2c00b9518d3342dfb42b31f2d000fda8,
title = "Intratextual persuasive messages as catalysts for higherorder thinking: An exploratory investigation",
abstract = "Facilitating students’ acquisition of higherorder thinking skills is imperative in the 21st century. Although some types of text have been shown to enhance higherorder thinking, the effects of many novel forms of text have yet to be investigated. As such, the purpose of the present study was to explore the extent to which a relatively novel form of text (i.e., intratextual persuasive message) served as a catalyst for students’ higherorder thinking as evidenced in the quantity, quality, and content of their arguments before and after reading. The findings revealed that the quantity of students’ arguments increased from prereading to postreading and the content of the reasons provided by the students was more in line with those of the authors, whereas the quality of students’ arguments decreased over time. Interestingly, relatively few students altered their position on the central question from the text. Rather, the nature of the data indicated that students engaged in case-building as they read the text. As a result, the intratextual persuasive message was only minimally effective at enhancing students’ higherorder thinking. Implications for research and practice are forwarded.",
author = "Murphy, {Pricilla Karen} and Andria Andiliou and Firetto, {Carla M.} and Bowersox, {Carissa M.} and Markus Baker and Ramsay, {Crystal M.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1086296X16660652",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "134--163",
journal = "Journal of Literacy Research",
issn = "1086-296X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Intratextual persuasive messages as catalysts for higherorder thinking : An exploratory investigation. / Murphy, Pricilla Karen; Andiliou, Andria; Firetto, Carla M.; Bowersox, Carissa M.; Baker, Markus; Ramsay, Crystal M.

In: Journal of Literacy Research, Vol. 48, No. 2, 01.01.2016, p. 134-163.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intratextual persuasive messages as catalysts for higherorder thinking

T2 - An exploratory investigation

AU - Murphy, Pricilla Karen

AU - Andiliou, Andria

AU - Firetto, Carla M.

AU - Bowersox, Carissa M.

AU - Baker, Markus

AU - Ramsay, Crystal M.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Facilitating students’ acquisition of higherorder thinking skills is imperative in the 21st century. Although some types of text have been shown to enhance higherorder thinking, the effects of many novel forms of text have yet to be investigated. As such, the purpose of the present study was to explore the extent to which a relatively novel form of text (i.e., intratextual persuasive message) served as a catalyst for students’ higherorder thinking as evidenced in the quantity, quality, and content of their arguments before and after reading. The findings revealed that the quantity of students’ arguments increased from prereading to postreading and the content of the reasons provided by the students was more in line with those of the authors, whereas the quality of students’ arguments decreased over time. Interestingly, relatively few students altered their position on the central question from the text. Rather, the nature of the data indicated that students engaged in case-building as they read the text. As a result, the intratextual persuasive message was only minimally effective at enhancing students’ higherorder thinking. Implications for research and practice are forwarded.

AB - Facilitating students’ acquisition of higherorder thinking skills is imperative in the 21st century. Although some types of text have been shown to enhance higherorder thinking, the effects of many novel forms of text have yet to be investigated. As such, the purpose of the present study was to explore the extent to which a relatively novel form of text (i.e., intratextual persuasive message) served as a catalyst for students’ higherorder thinking as evidenced in the quantity, quality, and content of their arguments before and after reading. The findings revealed that the quantity of students’ arguments increased from prereading to postreading and the content of the reasons provided by the students was more in line with those of the authors, whereas the quality of students’ arguments decreased over time. Interestingly, relatively few students altered their position on the central question from the text. Rather, the nature of the data indicated that students engaged in case-building as they read the text. As a result, the intratextual persuasive message was only minimally effective at enhancing students’ higherorder thinking. Implications for research and practice are forwarded.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991706386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84991706386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1086296X16660652

DO - 10.1177/1086296X16660652

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 134

EP - 163

JO - Journal of Literacy Research

JF - Journal of Literacy Research

SN - 1086-296X

IS - 2

ER -