Intravenous contrast extravasation during CT: A national data registry and practice quality improvement initiative

Thomas Dykes, Mythreyi Bhargavan-Chatfield, Raymond B. Dyer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose Establish 3 performance benchmarks for intravenous contrast extravasation during CT examinations: extravasation frequency, distribution of extravasation volumes, and severity of injury. Evaluate the effectiveness of implementing practice quality improvement (PQI) methodology in improving performance for these 3 benchmarks. Methods The Society of Abdominal Radiology and ACR developed a registry collecting data for contrast extravasation events. The project includes a PQI initiative allowing for process improvement. Results As of December 2013, a total of 58 radiology practices have participated in this project, and 32 practices have completed the 2-cycle PQI. There were a total of 454,497 contrast-enhanced CT exams and 1,085 extravasation events. The average extravasation rate is 0.24%. The median extravasation rate is 0.21%. Most extravasations (82.9%) were between 10 mL and 99 mL. The majority of injuries, 94.6%, are mild in severity, with 4.7% having moderate and 0.8% having severe injuries. Data from practices that completed the PQI process showed a change in the average extravasation rate from 0.28% in the first 6 months to 0.23% in the second 6 months, and the median extravasation rate dropped from 0.25% to 0.16%, neither statistically significant. The distribution of extravasation volumes and the severity of injury did not change between the first and second measurement periods. Conclusions National performance benchmarks for contrast extravasation rate, distribution of volumes of extravasate, and distribution of severity of injury are established through this multi-institutional practice registry. The application of PQI failed to have a statistically significant positive impact on any of the 3 benchmarks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)183-191
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015

Fingerprint

Benchmarking
Quality Improvement
Registries
Wounds and Injuries
Radiology
Institutional Practice

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Dykes, Thomas ; Bhargavan-Chatfield, Mythreyi ; Dyer, Raymond B. / Intravenous contrast extravasation during CT : A national data registry and practice quality improvement initiative. In: Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2015 ; Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. 183-191.
@article{0de1433133d7433cb980152e37b83946,
title = "Intravenous contrast extravasation during CT: A national data registry and practice quality improvement initiative",
abstract = "Purpose Establish 3 performance benchmarks for intravenous contrast extravasation during CT examinations: extravasation frequency, distribution of extravasation volumes, and severity of injury. Evaluate the effectiveness of implementing practice quality improvement (PQI) methodology in improving performance for these 3 benchmarks. Methods The Society of Abdominal Radiology and ACR developed a registry collecting data for contrast extravasation events. The project includes a PQI initiative allowing for process improvement. Results As of December 2013, a total of 58 radiology practices have participated in this project, and 32 practices have completed the 2-cycle PQI. There were a total of 454,497 contrast-enhanced CT exams and 1,085 extravasation events. The average extravasation rate is 0.24{\%}. The median extravasation rate is 0.21{\%}. Most extravasations (82.9{\%}) were between 10 mL and 99 mL. The majority of injuries, 94.6{\%}, are mild in severity, with 4.7{\%} having moderate and 0.8{\%} having severe injuries. Data from practices that completed the PQI process showed a change in the average extravasation rate from 0.28{\%} in the first 6 months to 0.23{\%} in the second 6 months, and the median extravasation rate dropped from 0.25{\%} to 0.16{\%}, neither statistically significant. The distribution of extravasation volumes and the severity of injury did not change between the first and second measurement periods. Conclusions National performance benchmarks for contrast extravasation rate, distribution of volumes of extravasate, and distribution of severity of injury are established through this multi-institutional practice registry. The application of PQI failed to have a statistically significant positive impact on any of the 3 benchmarks.",
author = "Thomas Dykes and Mythreyi Bhargavan-Chatfield and Dyer, {Raymond B.}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2014.07.021",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "183--191",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

Intravenous contrast extravasation during CT : A national data registry and practice quality improvement initiative. / Dykes, Thomas; Bhargavan-Chatfield, Mythreyi; Dyer, Raymond B.

In: Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 12, No. 2, 01.02.2015, p. 183-191.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intravenous contrast extravasation during CT

T2 - A national data registry and practice quality improvement initiative

AU - Dykes, Thomas

AU - Bhargavan-Chatfield, Mythreyi

AU - Dyer, Raymond B.

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Purpose Establish 3 performance benchmarks for intravenous contrast extravasation during CT examinations: extravasation frequency, distribution of extravasation volumes, and severity of injury. Evaluate the effectiveness of implementing practice quality improvement (PQI) methodology in improving performance for these 3 benchmarks. Methods The Society of Abdominal Radiology and ACR developed a registry collecting data for contrast extravasation events. The project includes a PQI initiative allowing for process improvement. Results As of December 2013, a total of 58 radiology practices have participated in this project, and 32 practices have completed the 2-cycle PQI. There were a total of 454,497 contrast-enhanced CT exams and 1,085 extravasation events. The average extravasation rate is 0.24%. The median extravasation rate is 0.21%. Most extravasations (82.9%) were between 10 mL and 99 mL. The majority of injuries, 94.6%, are mild in severity, with 4.7% having moderate and 0.8% having severe injuries. Data from practices that completed the PQI process showed a change in the average extravasation rate from 0.28% in the first 6 months to 0.23% in the second 6 months, and the median extravasation rate dropped from 0.25% to 0.16%, neither statistically significant. The distribution of extravasation volumes and the severity of injury did not change between the first and second measurement periods. Conclusions National performance benchmarks for contrast extravasation rate, distribution of volumes of extravasate, and distribution of severity of injury are established through this multi-institutional practice registry. The application of PQI failed to have a statistically significant positive impact on any of the 3 benchmarks.

AB - Purpose Establish 3 performance benchmarks for intravenous contrast extravasation during CT examinations: extravasation frequency, distribution of extravasation volumes, and severity of injury. Evaluate the effectiveness of implementing practice quality improvement (PQI) methodology in improving performance for these 3 benchmarks. Methods The Society of Abdominal Radiology and ACR developed a registry collecting data for contrast extravasation events. The project includes a PQI initiative allowing for process improvement. Results As of December 2013, a total of 58 radiology practices have participated in this project, and 32 practices have completed the 2-cycle PQI. There were a total of 454,497 contrast-enhanced CT exams and 1,085 extravasation events. The average extravasation rate is 0.24%. The median extravasation rate is 0.21%. Most extravasations (82.9%) were between 10 mL and 99 mL. The majority of injuries, 94.6%, are mild in severity, with 4.7% having moderate and 0.8% having severe injuries. Data from practices that completed the PQI process showed a change in the average extravasation rate from 0.28% in the first 6 months to 0.23% in the second 6 months, and the median extravasation rate dropped from 0.25% to 0.16%, neither statistically significant. The distribution of extravasation volumes and the severity of injury did not change between the first and second measurement periods. Conclusions National performance benchmarks for contrast extravasation rate, distribution of volumes of extravasate, and distribution of severity of injury are established through this multi-institutional practice registry. The application of PQI failed to have a statistically significant positive impact on any of the 3 benchmarks.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964253265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964253265&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.07.021

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.07.021

M3 - Article

C2 - 25245788

AN - SCOPUS:84964253265

VL - 12

SP - 183

EP - 191

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

IS - 2

ER -