Introduction

Robert Lawrence Caserio, Jr., Clement Hawes

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingForeword/postscript

Abstract

Some important English novels have been popular; some have not; but our volume is not a history of bestsellers. Granted, the novel is not an entirely autonomous literary form, developing in isolation from the influence of market forces. Nor does it develop in isolation from politics, national or international. Far from it: no one could seriously make such an argument. And yet if the novel sees at all – if it offers unique insights – it does so through the ceaseless making, breaking, and remaking of literary forms. Every decision that a novelist makes is formally mediated, and retracing those decisions provides access to the history of the novel. By attending to this history of formal innovations one begins to understand the range and depth of which the English novel has been capable. We hope, even though the Cambridge History concludes by affirming the enduring power of romance, that our way of turning the novel’s progress into history is less quixotic than the quest of the Knight of the Woeful Countenance. The challenging side of the genre never fades from view: it does, after all, create something new under the sun. To be sure, the aesthetic and the political avant-garde do not necessarily coincide. And, in any case, as Mikhail Bakhtin points out, any one asserted perspective in the novel is usually rendered relative to others with which it is in conflict.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Cambridge History of the English Novel
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages1-13
Number of pages13
ISBN (Electronic)9781139013796
ISBN (Print)9780521194952
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

Fingerprint

History
English Novel
Isolation
Literary Forms
Novelist
Sun
Knight
Innovation
Bestsellers
Avant Garde
Aesthetics
Mikhail Bakhtin
Romance
Novel

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Caserio, Jr., R. L., & Hawes, C. (2012). Introduction. In The Cambridge History of the English Novel (pp. 1-13). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521194952.002
Caserio, Jr., Robert Lawrence ; Hawes, Clement. / Introduction. The Cambridge History of the English Novel. Cambridge University Press, 2012. pp. 1-13
@inbook{c5ba0d9e8dbb4af680c75d0ac3152dbc,
title = "Introduction",
abstract = "Some important English novels have been popular; some have not; but our volume is not a history of bestsellers. Granted, the novel is not an entirely autonomous literary form, developing in isolation from the influence of market forces. Nor does it develop in isolation from politics, national or international. Far from it: no one could seriously make such an argument. And yet if the novel sees at all – if it offers unique insights – it does so through the ceaseless making, breaking, and remaking of literary forms. Every decision that a novelist makes is formally mediated, and retracing those decisions provides access to the history of the novel. By attending to this history of formal innovations one begins to understand the range and depth of which the English novel has been capable. We hope, even though the Cambridge History concludes by affirming the enduring power of romance, that our way of turning the novel’s progress into history is less quixotic than the quest of the Knight of the Woeful Countenance. The challenging side of the genre never fades from view: it does, after all, create something new under the sun. To be sure, the aesthetic and the political avant-garde do not necessarily coincide. And, in any case, as Mikhail Bakhtin points out, any one asserted perspective in the novel is usually rendered relative to others with which it is in conflict.",
author = "{Caserio, Jr.}, {Robert Lawrence} and Clement Hawes",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CHOL9780521194952.002",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780521194952",
pages = "1--13",
booktitle = "The Cambridge History of the English Novel",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Caserio, Jr., RL & Hawes, C 2012, Introduction. in The Cambridge History of the English Novel. Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521194952.002

Introduction. / Caserio, Jr., Robert Lawrence; Hawes, Clement.

The Cambridge History of the English Novel. Cambridge University Press, 2012. p. 1-13.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingForeword/postscript

TY - CHAP

T1 - Introduction

AU - Caserio, Jr., Robert Lawrence

AU - Hawes, Clement

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Some important English novels have been popular; some have not; but our volume is not a history of bestsellers. Granted, the novel is not an entirely autonomous literary form, developing in isolation from the influence of market forces. Nor does it develop in isolation from politics, national or international. Far from it: no one could seriously make such an argument. And yet if the novel sees at all – if it offers unique insights – it does so through the ceaseless making, breaking, and remaking of literary forms. Every decision that a novelist makes is formally mediated, and retracing those decisions provides access to the history of the novel. By attending to this history of formal innovations one begins to understand the range and depth of which the English novel has been capable. We hope, even though the Cambridge History concludes by affirming the enduring power of romance, that our way of turning the novel’s progress into history is less quixotic than the quest of the Knight of the Woeful Countenance. The challenging side of the genre never fades from view: it does, after all, create something new under the sun. To be sure, the aesthetic and the political avant-garde do not necessarily coincide. And, in any case, as Mikhail Bakhtin points out, any one asserted perspective in the novel is usually rendered relative to others with which it is in conflict.

AB - Some important English novels have been popular; some have not; but our volume is not a history of bestsellers. Granted, the novel is not an entirely autonomous literary form, developing in isolation from the influence of market forces. Nor does it develop in isolation from politics, national or international. Far from it: no one could seriously make such an argument. And yet if the novel sees at all – if it offers unique insights – it does so through the ceaseless making, breaking, and remaking of literary forms. Every decision that a novelist makes is formally mediated, and retracing those decisions provides access to the history of the novel. By attending to this history of formal innovations one begins to understand the range and depth of which the English novel has been capable. We hope, even though the Cambridge History concludes by affirming the enduring power of romance, that our way of turning the novel’s progress into history is less quixotic than the quest of the Knight of the Woeful Countenance. The challenging side of the genre never fades from view: it does, after all, create something new under the sun. To be sure, the aesthetic and the political avant-garde do not necessarily coincide. And, in any case, as Mikhail Bakhtin points out, any one asserted perspective in the novel is usually rendered relative to others with which it is in conflict.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926248734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926248734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CHOL9780521194952.002

DO - 10.1017/CHOL9780521194952.002

M3 - Foreword/postscript

AN - SCOPUS:84926248734

SN - 9780521194952

SP - 1

EP - 13

BT - The Cambridge History of the English Novel

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -

Caserio, Jr. RL, Hawes C. Introduction. In The Cambridge History of the English Novel. Cambridge University Press. 2012. p. 1-13 https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521194952.002