Investor perceptions of financial misconduct: The heterogeneous contamination of bystander firms

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We suggest that, when one firm reveals financial misconduct, others in the industry suffer lower valuations, but do so heterogeneously. To understand this heterogeneity, we conceptualize such contamination as a generalization-instantiation process: investors generalize the culpability to the industry category and perceive the instantiation of generalized culpability within the industry bystander firms. This theoretical separation allows us to hypothesize the factors that affect the degree to which both of these elements of the contamination process occurs. Specifically, we predict that characteristics of the misconduct firm or event-factors that lend to investors' familiarity with the misconduct firms, or that prompt attributions of blame for the misconduct-affect the potency of the generalization of culpability to the industry, while characteristics of the industry bystander firms-investors' familiarity with such firms, or factors that lend to investors' perceptions that they have strong governance-affect the firms' vulnerability to being perceived as instantiating the generalized culpability. We tested our hypotheses on a sample of 725 firms across 84 financial misconduct events, and the results of our event analyses broadly support our predictions. Our study thus has implications for future research on the social view of financial markets, organizational misconduct, and corporate governance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)169-194
Number of pages26
JournalAcademy of Management Journal
Volume58
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015

Fingerprint

Contamination
Industry
Investors
Factors

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

@article{0072e64bdf7d4fcca8327e8cfd035adb,
title = "Investor perceptions of financial misconduct: The heterogeneous contamination of bystander firms",
abstract = "We suggest that, when one firm reveals financial misconduct, others in the industry suffer lower valuations, but do so heterogeneously. To understand this heterogeneity, we conceptualize such contamination as a generalization-instantiation process: investors generalize the culpability to the industry category and perceive the instantiation of generalized culpability within the industry bystander firms. This theoretical separation allows us to hypothesize the factors that affect the degree to which both of these elements of the contamination process occurs. Specifically, we predict that characteristics of the misconduct firm or event-factors that lend to investors' familiarity with the misconduct firms, or that prompt attributions of blame for the misconduct-affect the potency of the generalization of culpability to the industry, while characteristics of the industry bystander firms-investors' familiarity with such firms, or factors that lend to investors' perceptions that they have strong governance-affect the firms' vulnerability to being perceived as instantiating the generalized culpability. We tested our hypotheses on a sample of 725 firms across 84 financial misconduct events, and the results of our event analyses broadly support our predictions. Our study thus has implications for future research on the social view of financial markets, organizational misconduct, and corporate governance.",
author = "Srikanth Paruchuri and Misangyi, {Vilmos Fosnocht}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5465/amj.2012.0704",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "169--194",
journal = "Academy of Management Journal",
issn = "0001-4273",
publisher = "Academy of Management",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investor perceptions of financial misconduct

T2 - The heterogeneous contamination of bystander firms

AU - Paruchuri, Srikanth

AU - Misangyi, Vilmos Fosnocht

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - We suggest that, when one firm reveals financial misconduct, others in the industry suffer lower valuations, but do so heterogeneously. To understand this heterogeneity, we conceptualize such contamination as a generalization-instantiation process: investors generalize the culpability to the industry category and perceive the instantiation of generalized culpability within the industry bystander firms. This theoretical separation allows us to hypothesize the factors that affect the degree to which both of these elements of the contamination process occurs. Specifically, we predict that characteristics of the misconduct firm or event-factors that lend to investors' familiarity with the misconduct firms, or that prompt attributions of blame for the misconduct-affect the potency of the generalization of culpability to the industry, while characteristics of the industry bystander firms-investors' familiarity with such firms, or factors that lend to investors' perceptions that they have strong governance-affect the firms' vulnerability to being perceived as instantiating the generalized culpability. We tested our hypotheses on a sample of 725 firms across 84 financial misconduct events, and the results of our event analyses broadly support our predictions. Our study thus has implications for future research on the social view of financial markets, organizational misconduct, and corporate governance.

AB - We suggest that, when one firm reveals financial misconduct, others in the industry suffer lower valuations, but do so heterogeneously. To understand this heterogeneity, we conceptualize such contamination as a generalization-instantiation process: investors generalize the culpability to the industry category and perceive the instantiation of generalized culpability within the industry bystander firms. This theoretical separation allows us to hypothesize the factors that affect the degree to which both of these elements of the contamination process occurs. Specifically, we predict that characteristics of the misconduct firm or event-factors that lend to investors' familiarity with the misconduct firms, or that prompt attributions of blame for the misconduct-affect the potency of the generalization of culpability to the industry, while characteristics of the industry bystander firms-investors' familiarity with such firms, or factors that lend to investors' perceptions that they have strong governance-affect the firms' vulnerability to being perceived as instantiating the generalized culpability. We tested our hypotheses on a sample of 725 firms across 84 financial misconduct events, and the results of our event analyses broadly support our predictions. Our study thus has implications for future research on the social view of financial markets, organizational misconduct, and corporate governance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923821510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923821510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5465/amj.2012.0704

DO - 10.5465/amj.2012.0704

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84923821510

VL - 58

SP - 169

EP - 194

JO - Academy of Management Journal

JF - Academy of Management Journal

SN - 0001-4273

IS - 1

ER -