Inviscid models of cyclonically driven internal flows

Brian Allen Maicke, Joseph Majdalani

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, we review several inviscid, helical solutions that are developed in the context of cyclonic, swirl-driven combustors. Specifically, the survey focuses on three solutions: an exact inviscid solution, a heuristic model for swirl velocities, and a compressible vortex model derived from a modified form of the Bragg–Hawthorne equation. As part of this endeavor, an overview of the derivations and assumptions is provided. The structures of the resulting solutions are then contrasted by comparing their velocity fields. In all cases the outer region of the helical motion is characterized by the presence of a free, irrotational vortex. The key difference between the three models presented here originates from the manner by which their core regions are treated. In the exact inviscid solution, the swirl velocity remains singular as it approaches the centerline. Conversely, in the constant shear stress and compressible Bragg–Hawthorne models, the core singularity is suppressed. The resulting formulations provide the basis for ongoing efforts to increase the available toolsets for modeling-confined helical motions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)305-324
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of Energetic Materials and Chemical Propulsion
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Vortex flow
Combustors
Shear stress

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Materials Science(all)

Cite this

@article{9639b7c10ac64407901785873c443d66,
title = "Inviscid models of cyclonically driven internal flows",
abstract = "In this article, we review several inviscid, helical solutions that are developed in the context of cyclonic, swirl-driven combustors. Specifically, the survey focuses on three solutions: an exact inviscid solution, a heuristic model for swirl velocities, and a compressible vortex model derived from a modified form of the Bragg–Hawthorne equation. As part of this endeavor, an overview of the derivations and assumptions is provided. The structures of the resulting solutions are then contrasted by comparing their velocity fields. In all cases the outer region of the helical motion is characterized by the presence of a free, irrotational vortex. The key difference between the three models presented here originates from the manner by which their core regions are treated. In the exact inviscid solution, the swirl velocity remains singular as it approaches the centerline. Conversely, in the constant shear stress and compressible Bragg–Hawthorne models, the core singularity is suppressed. The resulting formulations provide the basis for ongoing efforts to increase the available toolsets for modeling-confined helical motions.",
author = "Maicke, {Brian Allen} and Joseph Majdalani",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1615/IntJEnergeticMaterialsChemProp.2016016511",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "305--324",
journal = "International Journal of Energetic Materials and Chemical Propulsion",
issn = "2150-766X",
publisher = "Begell House Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Inviscid models of cyclonically driven internal flows. / Maicke, Brian Allen; Majdalani, Joseph.

In: International Journal of Energetic Materials and Chemical Propulsion, Vol. 15, No. 4, 01.01.2016, p. 305-324.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inviscid models of cyclonically driven internal flows

AU - Maicke, Brian Allen

AU - Majdalani, Joseph

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - In this article, we review several inviscid, helical solutions that are developed in the context of cyclonic, swirl-driven combustors. Specifically, the survey focuses on three solutions: an exact inviscid solution, a heuristic model for swirl velocities, and a compressible vortex model derived from a modified form of the Bragg–Hawthorne equation. As part of this endeavor, an overview of the derivations and assumptions is provided. The structures of the resulting solutions are then contrasted by comparing their velocity fields. In all cases the outer region of the helical motion is characterized by the presence of a free, irrotational vortex. The key difference between the three models presented here originates from the manner by which their core regions are treated. In the exact inviscid solution, the swirl velocity remains singular as it approaches the centerline. Conversely, in the constant shear stress and compressible Bragg–Hawthorne models, the core singularity is suppressed. The resulting formulations provide the basis for ongoing efforts to increase the available toolsets for modeling-confined helical motions.

AB - In this article, we review several inviscid, helical solutions that are developed in the context of cyclonic, swirl-driven combustors. Specifically, the survey focuses on three solutions: an exact inviscid solution, a heuristic model for swirl velocities, and a compressible vortex model derived from a modified form of the Bragg–Hawthorne equation. As part of this endeavor, an overview of the derivations and assumptions is provided. The structures of the resulting solutions are then contrasted by comparing their velocity fields. In all cases the outer region of the helical motion is characterized by the presence of a free, irrotational vortex. The key difference between the three models presented here originates from the manner by which their core regions are treated. In the exact inviscid solution, the swirl velocity remains singular as it approaches the centerline. Conversely, in the constant shear stress and compressible Bragg–Hawthorne models, the core singularity is suppressed. The resulting formulations provide the basis for ongoing efforts to increase the available toolsets for modeling-confined helical motions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015699751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015699751&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1615/IntJEnergeticMaterialsChemProp.2016016511

DO - 10.1615/IntJEnergeticMaterialsChemProp.2016016511

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85015699751

VL - 15

SP - 305

EP - 324

JO - International Journal of Energetic Materials and Chemical Propulsion

JF - International Journal of Energetic Materials and Chemical Propulsion

SN - 2150-766X

IS - 4

ER -