Is assortment selection a popularity contest? A study of assortment, return policy, and pricing decisions of a retailer

Aydin Alptekinoglu, Alex Grasas Alex, Elif Akçalı

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Should retailers take product returns into account when choosing their assortments? And, when doing so, should they consider assortment selection as a popularity contest - by carrying products that they think will be popular among consumers? Or, is there ever a case for carrying eccentric products - those that are least likely to be purchased by a typical consumer? In search of answers to these questions, we explore in this chapter the interactions between product assortment, return policy, and pricing decisions of a retailer. We consider a category of horizontally differentiated products delivered in two alternative supply modes: make-to-order (MTO) and make-to-stock (MTS). In the MTO mode, products are supplied after demand materializes, whereas in the MTS mode, the retailer stocks products prior to the selling season. Underlying our demand model, consumer choice behavior follows a nested multinomial logit model, with the first stage involving a product choice, and the second stage involving a keep-or-return decision. We show that the structure of the optimal assortment strongly depends on both the return policy, which we parameterize by refund fraction (percentage of price refunded upon return) and the supply mode (MTO vs. MTS). For relatively strict return policies with a sufficiently low refund fraction, it is optimal for the retailer to offer most eccentric products in the MTO mode, and a mix of most popular and most eccentric products in the MTS mode. For relatively lenient return policies, on the other hand, conventional thinking applies: the retailer selects most popular products. We also numerically study three extensions of our base model to incorporate: (1) endogenous price, (2) endogenous refund fraction, and (3) multiple periods.We demonstrate that interesting aspects of our results regarding strict return policies prevail under all of these extensions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationInternational Series in Operations Research and Management Science
PublisherSpringer New York LLC
Pages205-228
Number of pages24
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Publication series

NameInternational Series in Operations Research and Management Science
Volume131
ISSN (Print)0884-8289

Fingerprint

Pricing
Consumer behavior
Costs
Sales
Policy
Assortment
Pricing decisions
Contests
Return policy
Retailers
Multinomial Logit Model
Parameterise
Make-to-order
Make-to-stock
Percentage
Likely
Refunds
Alternatives

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Software
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Applied Mathematics

Cite this

Alptekinoglu, A., Alex, A. G., & Akçalı, E. (2009). Is assortment selection a popularity contest? A study of assortment, return policy, and pricing decisions of a retailer. In International Series in Operations Research and Management Science (pp. 205-228). (International Series in Operations Research and Management Science; Vol. 131). Springer New York LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98026-3_8
Alptekinoglu, Aydin ; Alex, Alex Grasas ; Akçalı, Elif. / Is assortment selection a popularity contest? A study of assortment, return policy, and pricing decisions of a retailer. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science. Springer New York LLC, 2009. pp. 205-228 (International Series in Operations Research and Management Science).
@inbook{d136611b581445ecbaab824183c03605,
title = "Is assortment selection a popularity contest? A study of assortment, return policy, and pricing decisions of a retailer",
abstract = "Should retailers take product returns into account when choosing their assortments? And, when doing so, should they consider assortment selection as a popularity contest - by carrying products that they think will be popular among consumers? Or, is there ever a case for carrying eccentric products - those that are least likely to be purchased by a typical consumer? In search of answers to these questions, we explore in this chapter the interactions between product assortment, return policy, and pricing decisions of a retailer. We consider a category of horizontally differentiated products delivered in two alternative supply modes: make-to-order (MTO) and make-to-stock (MTS). In the MTO mode, products are supplied after demand materializes, whereas in the MTS mode, the retailer stocks products prior to the selling season. Underlying our demand model, consumer choice behavior follows a nested multinomial logit model, with the first stage involving a product choice, and the second stage involving a keep-or-return decision. We show that the structure of the optimal assortment strongly depends on both the return policy, which we parameterize by refund fraction (percentage of price refunded upon return) and the supply mode (MTO vs. MTS). For relatively strict return policies with a sufficiently low refund fraction, it is optimal for the retailer to offer most eccentric products in the MTO mode, and a mix of most popular and most eccentric products in the MTS mode. For relatively lenient return policies, on the other hand, conventional thinking applies: the retailer selects most popular products. We also numerically study three extensions of our base model to incorporate: (1) endogenous price, (2) endogenous refund fraction, and (3) multiple periods.We demonstrate that interesting aspects of our results regarding strict return policies prevail under all of these extensions.",
author = "Aydin Alptekinoglu and Alex, {Alex Grasas} and Elif Ak{\cc}alı",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-0-387-98026-3_8",
language = "English (US)",
series = "International Series in Operations Research and Management Science",
publisher = "Springer New York LLC",
pages = "205--228",
booktitle = "International Series in Operations Research and Management Science",

}

Alptekinoglu, A, Alex, AG & Akçalı, E 2009, Is assortment selection a popularity contest? A study of assortment, return policy, and pricing decisions of a retailer. in International Series in Operations Research and Management Science. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 131, Springer New York LLC, pp. 205-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98026-3_8

Is assortment selection a popularity contest? A study of assortment, return policy, and pricing decisions of a retailer. / Alptekinoglu, Aydin; Alex, Alex Grasas; Akçalı, Elif.

International Series in Operations Research and Management Science. Springer New York LLC, 2009. p. 205-228 (International Series in Operations Research and Management Science; Vol. 131).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Is assortment selection a popularity contest? A study of assortment, return policy, and pricing decisions of a retailer

AU - Alptekinoglu, Aydin

AU - Alex, Alex Grasas

AU - Akçalı, Elif

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Should retailers take product returns into account when choosing their assortments? And, when doing so, should they consider assortment selection as a popularity contest - by carrying products that they think will be popular among consumers? Or, is there ever a case for carrying eccentric products - those that are least likely to be purchased by a typical consumer? In search of answers to these questions, we explore in this chapter the interactions between product assortment, return policy, and pricing decisions of a retailer. We consider a category of horizontally differentiated products delivered in two alternative supply modes: make-to-order (MTO) and make-to-stock (MTS). In the MTO mode, products are supplied after demand materializes, whereas in the MTS mode, the retailer stocks products prior to the selling season. Underlying our demand model, consumer choice behavior follows a nested multinomial logit model, with the first stage involving a product choice, and the second stage involving a keep-or-return decision. We show that the structure of the optimal assortment strongly depends on both the return policy, which we parameterize by refund fraction (percentage of price refunded upon return) and the supply mode (MTO vs. MTS). For relatively strict return policies with a sufficiently low refund fraction, it is optimal for the retailer to offer most eccentric products in the MTO mode, and a mix of most popular and most eccentric products in the MTS mode. For relatively lenient return policies, on the other hand, conventional thinking applies: the retailer selects most popular products. We also numerically study three extensions of our base model to incorporate: (1) endogenous price, (2) endogenous refund fraction, and (3) multiple periods.We demonstrate that interesting aspects of our results regarding strict return policies prevail under all of these extensions.

AB - Should retailers take product returns into account when choosing their assortments? And, when doing so, should they consider assortment selection as a popularity contest - by carrying products that they think will be popular among consumers? Or, is there ever a case for carrying eccentric products - those that are least likely to be purchased by a typical consumer? In search of answers to these questions, we explore in this chapter the interactions between product assortment, return policy, and pricing decisions of a retailer. We consider a category of horizontally differentiated products delivered in two alternative supply modes: make-to-order (MTO) and make-to-stock (MTS). In the MTO mode, products are supplied after demand materializes, whereas in the MTS mode, the retailer stocks products prior to the selling season. Underlying our demand model, consumer choice behavior follows a nested multinomial logit model, with the first stage involving a product choice, and the second stage involving a keep-or-return decision. We show that the structure of the optimal assortment strongly depends on both the return policy, which we parameterize by refund fraction (percentage of price refunded upon return) and the supply mode (MTO vs. MTS). For relatively strict return policies with a sufficiently low refund fraction, it is optimal for the retailer to offer most eccentric products in the MTO mode, and a mix of most popular and most eccentric products in the MTS mode. For relatively lenient return policies, on the other hand, conventional thinking applies: the retailer selects most popular products. We also numerically study three extensions of our base model to incorporate: (1) endogenous price, (2) endogenous refund fraction, and (3) multiple periods.We demonstrate that interesting aspects of our results regarding strict return policies prevail under all of these extensions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954491422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954491422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-0-387-98026-3_8

DO - 10.1007/978-0-387-98026-3_8

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84954491422

T3 - International Series in Operations Research and Management Science

SP - 205

EP - 228

BT - International Series in Operations Research and Management Science

PB - Springer New York LLC

ER -

Alptekinoglu A, Alex AG, Akçalı E. Is assortment selection a popularity contest? A study of assortment, return policy, and pricing decisions of a retailer. In International Series in Operations Research and Management Science. Springer New York LLC. 2009. p. 205-228. (International Series in Operations Research and Management Science). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98026-3_8