Is levinas's philosophy a response to the holocaust?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Some commentators have claimed that Emmanuel Levinas's philosophy should be understood as a response to the Holocaust. This study assesses that claim. It begins by clarifying what it means to call his philosophy a "response. " The bulk of the article then analyzes his essay, "Useless Suffering," one of the few works in Levinas's philosophic oeuvre where he discusses the Holocaust. Levinas is widely read as claiming that there can be no explanation for the Holocaust-that it marks "the end of theodicy." It is shown, however, that his point is not that it cannot be explained, but that we misjudge the nature of evil when we view it as calling for explanation rather than practical activity. Based on this analysis, it is argued that Levinas's philosophy can be understood as a response to the Holocaust in the sense of being a performative writing that sought to address the evil that occurred in the Holocaust by transforming the ethical sensibilities of his readers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)121-146
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

Holocaust
philosophy
Emmanuel Levinas
Philosophy
Evil

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cultural Studies
  • Anthropology
  • Religious studies
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Philosophy
  • Literature and Literary Theory

Cite this

@article{ef9645b60a7f485589d15207d20fde55,
title = "Is levinas's philosophy a response to the holocaust?",
abstract = "Some commentators have claimed that Emmanuel Levinas's philosophy should be understood as a response to the Holocaust. This study assesses that claim. It begins by clarifying what it means to call his philosophy a {"}response. {"} The bulk of the article then analyzes his essay, {"}Useless Suffering,{"} one of the few works in Levinas's philosophic oeuvre where he discusses the Holocaust. Levinas is widely read as claiming that there can be no explanation for the Holocaust-that it marks {"}the end of theodicy.{"} It is shown, however, that his point is not that it cannot be explained, but that we misjudge the nature of evil when we view it as calling for explanation rather than practical activity. Based on this analysis, it is argued that Levinas's philosophy can be understood as a response to the Holocaust in the sense of being a performative writing that sought to address the evil that occurred in the Holocaust by transforming the ethical sensibilities of his readers.",
author = "Joshua Shaw",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1163/147728510X529018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "121--146",
journal = "Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy",
issn = "1053-699X",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "2",

}

Is levinas's philosophy a response to the holocaust? / Shaw, Joshua.

In: Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy, Vol. 18, No. 2, 01.01.2010, p. 121-146.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is levinas's philosophy a response to the holocaust?

AU - Shaw, Joshua

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Some commentators have claimed that Emmanuel Levinas's philosophy should be understood as a response to the Holocaust. This study assesses that claim. It begins by clarifying what it means to call his philosophy a "response. " The bulk of the article then analyzes his essay, "Useless Suffering," one of the few works in Levinas's philosophic oeuvre where he discusses the Holocaust. Levinas is widely read as claiming that there can be no explanation for the Holocaust-that it marks "the end of theodicy." It is shown, however, that his point is not that it cannot be explained, but that we misjudge the nature of evil when we view it as calling for explanation rather than practical activity. Based on this analysis, it is argued that Levinas's philosophy can be understood as a response to the Holocaust in the sense of being a performative writing that sought to address the evil that occurred in the Holocaust by transforming the ethical sensibilities of his readers.

AB - Some commentators have claimed that Emmanuel Levinas's philosophy should be understood as a response to the Holocaust. This study assesses that claim. It begins by clarifying what it means to call his philosophy a "response. " The bulk of the article then analyzes his essay, "Useless Suffering," one of the few works in Levinas's philosophic oeuvre where he discusses the Holocaust. Levinas is widely read as claiming that there can be no explanation for the Holocaust-that it marks "the end of theodicy." It is shown, however, that his point is not that it cannot be explained, but that we misjudge the nature of evil when we view it as calling for explanation rather than practical activity. Based on this analysis, it is argued that Levinas's philosophy can be understood as a response to the Holocaust in the sense of being a performative writing that sought to address the evil that occurred in the Holocaust by transforming the ethical sensibilities of his readers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649566772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649566772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/147728510X529018

DO - 10.1163/147728510X529018

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 121

EP - 146

JO - Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy

JF - Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy

SN - 1053-699X

IS - 2

ER -