Is the 2014 E-Rate reform a game changer? An empirical analysis of Pennsylvania data

Jenna Grzeslo, Yang Bai, Bumgi Min, Krishna Prasad Jayakar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the impact of the 2014 E-Rate reforms on the pattern of distribution of funds of the program. Design/methodology/approach: Using Pennsylvania data, the paper investigates whether a school district that successfully applied for funding received increased support post-reforms, and what socio-economic characteristics of school districts were associated with successful applications. Furthermore, it asks whether the reforms reduced the barriers that disadvantaged school districts face in obtaining support. Findings: The finding suggests that, even after controlling for changes in the school districts’ eligibility and application skills, the amount of funding committed to the school districts was still significantly higher after the reform. Originality/value: The analysis shows that, immediately after the reform, the non-urban school districts were committed more funding than urban school districts were; they also received more funds than they would have without the reforms. This indicates that the 2014 reform might have benefited disadvantaged applicants, especially rural school districts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)179-192
Number of pages14
JournalDigital Policy, Regulation and Governance
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 8 2019

Fingerprint

Economics
School districts
Empirical analysis
Funding
Socioeconomic characteristics
Design methodology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Management Information Systems
  • Information Systems
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

@article{e18164d82f5e4e298d62a9f4c1504187,
title = "Is the 2014 E-Rate reform a game changer? An empirical analysis of Pennsylvania data",
abstract = "Purpose: This study aims to analyze the impact of the 2014 E-Rate reforms on the pattern of distribution of funds of the program. Design/methodology/approach: Using Pennsylvania data, the paper investigates whether a school district that successfully applied for funding received increased support post-reforms, and what socio-economic characteristics of school districts were associated with successful applications. Furthermore, it asks whether the reforms reduced the barriers that disadvantaged school districts face in obtaining support. Findings: The finding suggests that, even after controlling for changes in the school districts’ eligibility and application skills, the amount of funding committed to the school districts was still significantly higher after the reform. Originality/value: The analysis shows that, immediately after the reform, the non-urban school districts were committed more funding than urban school districts were; they also received more funds than they would have without the reforms. This indicates that the 2014 reform might have benefited disadvantaged applicants, especially rural school districts.",
author = "Jenna Grzeslo and Yang Bai and Bumgi Min and Jayakar, {Krishna Prasad}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1108/DPRG-10-2018-0060",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "179--192",
journal = "Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance",
issn = "1463-6697",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Is the 2014 E-Rate reform a game changer? An empirical analysis of Pennsylvania data. / Grzeslo, Jenna; Bai, Yang; Min, Bumgi; Jayakar, Krishna Prasad.

In: Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, Vol. 21, No. 2, 08.03.2019, p. 179-192.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is the 2014 E-Rate reform a game changer? An empirical analysis of Pennsylvania data

AU - Grzeslo, Jenna

AU - Bai, Yang

AU - Min, Bumgi

AU - Jayakar, Krishna Prasad

PY - 2019/3/8

Y1 - 2019/3/8

N2 - Purpose: This study aims to analyze the impact of the 2014 E-Rate reforms on the pattern of distribution of funds of the program. Design/methodology/approach: Using Pennsylvania data, the paper investigates whether a school district that successfully applied for funding received increased support post-reforms, and what socio-economic characteristics of school districts were associated with successful applications. Furthermore, it asks whether the reforms reduced the barriers that disadvantaged school districts face in obtaining support. Findings: The finding suggests that, even after controlling for changes in the school districts’ eligibility and application skills, the amount of funding committed to the school districts was still significantly higher after the reform. Originality/value: The analysis shows that, immediately after the reform, the non-urban school districts were committed more funding than urban school districts were; they also received more funds than they would have without the reforms. This indicates that the 2014 reform might have benefited disadvantaged applicants, especially rural school districts.

AB - Purpose: This study aims to analyze the impact of the 2014 E-Rate reforms on the pattern of distribution of funds of the program. Design/methodology/approach: Using Pennsylvania data, the paper investigates whether a school district that successfully applied for funding received increased support post-reforms, and what socio-economic characteristics of school districts were associated with successful applications. Furthermore, it asks whether the reforms reduced the barriers that disadvantaged school districts face in obtaining support. Findings: The finding suggests that, even after controlling for changes in the school districts’ eligibility and application skills, the amount of funding committed to the school districts was still significantly higher after the reform. Originality/value: The analysis shows that, immediately after the reform, the non-urban school districts were committed more funding than urban school districts were; they also received more funds than they would have without the reforms. This indicates that the 2014 reform might have benefited disadvantaged applicants, especially rural school districts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060106584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060106584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/DPRG-10-2018-0060

DO - 10.1108/DPRG-10-2018-0060

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85060106584

VL - 21

SP - 179

EP - 192

JO - Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance

JF - Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance

SN - 1463-6697

IS - 2

ER -