ITS standardisation

Lessons from the consortium approach

Jonathan L. Gifford, Odd Jonas Stalebrink

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Standards for intelligent transportation system (ITS) equipment have been called for since the outset of the current ITS movement more than a decade ago. But progress towards standardisation has been slow. This paper provides an overview of three 'conventional' approaches to standardisation de facto standards, standards development organisations (SDOs) and regulatory standards. In the light of these approaches, it examines the contributions of a consortium approach to standardisation by presenting and analysing six case studies of consortia-based standards, both in ITS and in other sectors. The analysis brings attention to (a) instances where the cases illustrate the flexibility offered by a consortium; (b) instances where a consortium has led to speedy standardisation; and (c) conditions under which (a) and (b) are most successfully facilitated by consortia. It is concluded that a consortium approach to standardisation may be useful to ITS standardisation when the following three conditions are present in the domains of ITS: rapid technology cycle, dynamic market, and strong mutual interest.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)56-71
Number of pages16
JournalInternational Journal of Technology, Policy and Management
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2002

Fingerprint

Standardization
Consortium
Intelligent transportation systems

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

@article{130b3fb22bf1467c8f321bf94c3a5d0a,
title = "ITS standardisation: Lessons from the consortium approach",
abstract = "Standards for intelligent transportation system (ITS) equipment have been called for since the outset of the current ITS movement more than a decade ago. But progress towards standardisation has been slow. This paper provides an overview of three 'conventional' approaches to standardisation de facto standards, standards development organisations (SDOs) and regulatory standards. In the light of these approaches, it examines the contributions of a consortium approach to standardisation by presenting and analysing six case studies of consortia-based standards, both in ITS and in other sectors. The analysis brings attention to (a) instances where the cases illustrate the flexibility offered by a consortium; (b) instances where a consortium has led to speedy standardisation; and (c) conditions under which (a) and (b) are most successfully facilitated by consortia. It is concluded that a consortium approach to standardisation may be useful to ITS standardisation when the following three conditions are present in the domains of ITS: rapid technology cycle, dynamic market, and strong mutual interest.",
author = "Gifford, {Jonathan L.} and Stalebrink, {Odd Jonas}",
year = "2002",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1504/IJTPM.2002.001758",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "56--71",
journal = "International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management",
issn = "1468-4322",
publisher = "Inderscience Enterprises Ltd",
number = "1",

}

ITS standardisation : Lessons from the consortium approach. / Gifford, Jonathan L.; Stalebrink, Odd Jonas.

In: International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, Vol. 2, No. 1, 01.12.2002, p. 56-71.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - ITS standardisation

T2 - Lessons from the consortium approach

AU - Gifford, Jonathan L.

AU - Stalebrink, Odd Jonas

PY - 2002/12/1

Y1 - 2002/12/1

N2 - Standards for intelligent transportation system (ITS) equipment have been called for since the outset of the current ITS movement more than a decade ago. But progress towards standardisation has been slow. This paper provides an overview of three 'conventional' approaches to standardisation de facto standards, standards development organisations (SDOs) and regulatory standards. In the light of these approaches, it examines the contributions of a consortium approach to standardisation by presenting and analysing six case studies of consortia-based standards, both in ITS and in other sectors. The analysis brings attention to (a) instances where the cases illustrate the flexibility offered by a consortium; (b) instances where a consortium has led to speedy standardisation; and (c) conditions under which (a) and (b) are most successfully facilitated by consortia. It is concluded that a consortium approach to standardisation may be useful to ITS standardisation when the following three conditions are present in the domains of ITS: rapid technology cycle, dynamic market, and strong mutual interest.

AB - Standards for intelligent transportation system (ITS) equipment have been called for since the outset of the current ITS movement more than a decade ago. But progress towards standardisation has been slow. This paper provides an overview of three 'conventional' approaches to standardisation de facto standards, standards development organisations (SDOs) and regulatory standards. In the light of these approaches, it examines the contributions of a consortium approach to standardisation by presenting and analysing six case studies of consortia-based standards, both in ITS and in other sectors. The analysis brings attention to (a) instances where the cases illustrate the flexibility offered by a consortium; (b) instances where a consortium has led to speedy standardisation; and (c) conditions under which (a) and (b) are most successfully facilitated by consortia. It is concluded that a consortium approach to standardisation may be useful to ITS standardisation when the following three conditions are present in the domains of ITS: rapid technology cycle, dynamic market, and strong mutual interest.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4344658510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4344658510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1504/IJTPM.2002.001758

DO - 10.1504/IJTPM.2002.001758

M3 - Review article

VL - 2

SP - 56

EP - 71

JO - International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management

JF - International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management

SN - 1468-4322

IS - 1

ER -