I've fallen and i can't get up: Can high-ability students recover from early mistakes in CAT?

Kelly L. Rulison, Eric Loken

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

A difficult result to interpret in Computerized Adaptive Tests (CATs) occurs when an ability estimate initially drops and then ascends continuously until the test ends, suggesting that the true ability may be higher than implied by the final estimate. This study explains why this asymmetry occurs and shows that early mistakes by high-ability students can lead to considerable underestimation, even in tests with 45 items. The opposite response pattern, where low-ability students start with lucky guesses, leads to much less bias. The authors show that using Barton and Lord's four-parameter model (4PM) and a less informative prior can lower bias and root mean square error (RMSE) for high-ability students with a poor start, as the CAT algorithm ascends more quickly after initial underperformance. Results also show that the 4PM slightly outperforms a CAT in which less discriminating items are initially used. The practical implications and relevance for psychological measurement more generally are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)83-101
Number of pages19
JournalApplied Psychological Measurement
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'I've fallen and i can't get up: Can high-ability students recover from early mistakes in CAT?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this