Judgements of grammaticality in aphasia: The special case of Chinese

Ching Ching Lu, Elizabeth Bates, Ping Li, Ovid Tzeng, Daisy Hung, Chih Hao Tsai, Shu Er Lee, Yu Mei Chung

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    14 Scopus citations


    Theories of agrammatism have been challenged by the discovery that agrammatic patients can make above-chance judgements of grammaticality. Chinese poses an interesting test of this phenomenon, because its grammar is so austere, with few obligatory features. An on-line grammaticality judgement task was conducted with normal and aphasic speakers of Chinese, using the small set of constructions that do permit judgements of grammaticality in this language. Broca's and Wernicke's aphasics showed similar patterns, with above-chance discrimination between grammatical and ungrammatical forms, suggesting once again that Broca's aphasics are not unique in the degree of sparing or impairment that they show in receptive grammar. However, even for young normals, false-negative rates were high. We conclude that there is some sensitivity to grammatical well-formedness in Chinese aphasics, but the effect is fragile for aphasics and probabilistic for normals, reflecting the peculiar status of grammaticality in this language.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1021-1054
    Number of pages34
    Issue number10
    StatePublished - 2000

    All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

    • Otorhinolaryngology
    • Language and Linguistics
    • Developmental and Educational Psychology
    • Linguistics and Language
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Neurology
    • LPN and LVN


    Dive into the research topics of 'Judgements of grammaticality in aphasia: The special case of Chinese'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this