Jury service as an invitation to citizenship

Assessing the civic value of institutionalized deliberation

John W. Gastil, Phillip J. Weiser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When considering the merits of deliberative democracy, it is important to look into the experience of the American jury system. The jury has demonstrated the potential for citizen deliberation to play a central role in longstanding governmental institutions, but it has also played an unrecognized role in promoting civic engagement. Building on previous research demonstrating how jury service spurs increased electoral participation after jury service, we present results from a three-wave panel survey that show that a subjectively rewarding jury experience can spur broader civic engagement beyond voting. Given the value of the jury as both a model of deliberation and an engine of civic spirit, we consider the potential value of creating citizen juries to improve the initiative process, which currently lacks the citizen deliberation that is essential for any effective direct democratic processes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)605-627
Number of pages23
JournalPolicy Studies Journal
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2006

Fingerprint

citizenship
deliberation
citizen
Values
deliberative democracy
democracy
voting
engine
experience
participation
lack
services

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

@article{70dade6d60ed4f48889d698b12c24be3,
title = "Jury service as an invitation to citizenship: Assessing the civic value of institutionalized deliberation",
abstract = "When considering the merits of deliberative democracy, it is important to look into the experience of the American jury system. The jury has demonstrated the potential for citizen deliberation to play a central role in longstanding governmental institutions, but it has also played an unrecognized role in promoting civic engagement. Building on previous research demonstrating how jury service spurs increased electoral participation after jury service, we present results from a three-wave panel survey that show that a subjectively rewarding jury experience can spur broader civic engagement beyond voting. Given the value of the jury as both a model of deliberation and an engine of civic spirit, we consider the potential value of creating citizen juries to improve the initiative process, which currently lacks the citizen deliberation that is essential for any effective direct democratic processes.",
author = "Gastil, {John W.} and Weiser, {Phillip J.}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00194.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "605--627",
journal = "Policy Studies Journal",
issn = "0190-292X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Jury service as an invitation to citizenship : Assessing the civic value of institutionalized deliberation. / Gastil, John W.; Weiser, Phillip J.

In: Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 34, No. 4, 01.11.2006, p. 605-627.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Jury service as an invitation to citizenship

T2 - Assessing the civic value of institutionalized deliberation

AU - Gastil, John W.

AU - Weiser, Phillip J.

PY - 2006/11/1

Y1 - 2006/11/1

N2 - When considering the merits of deliberative democracy, it is important to look into the experience of the American jury system. The jury has demonstrated the potential for citizen deliberation to play a central role in longstanding governmental institutions, but it has also played an unrecognized role in promoting civic engagement. Building on previous research demonstrating how jury service spurs increased electoral participation after jury service, we present results from a three-wave panel survey that show that a subjectively rewarding jury experience can spur broader civic engagement beyond voting. Given the value of the jury as both a model of deliberation and an engine of civic spirit, we consider the potential value of creating citizen juries to improve the initiative process, which currently lacks the citizen deliberation that is essential for any effective direct democratic processes.

AB - When considering the merits of deliberative democracy, it is important to look into the experience of the American jury system. The jury has demonstrated the potential for citizen deliberation to play a central role in longstanding governmental institutions, but it has also played an unrecognized role in promoting civic engagement. Building on previous research demonstrating how jury service spurs increased electoral participation after jury service, we present results from a three-wave panel survey that show that a subjectively rewarding jury experience can spur broader civic engagement beyond voting. Given the value of the jury as both a model of deliberation and an engine of civic spirit, we consider the potential value of creating citizen juries to improve the initiative process, which currently lacks the citizen deliberation that is essential for any effective direct democratic processes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845530777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845530777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00194.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00194.x

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 605

EP - 627

JO - Policy Studies Journal

JF - Policy Studies Journal

SN - 0190-292X

IS - 4

ER -