Justice during Armed Conflict: A New Dataset on Government and Rebel Strategies

Cyanne E. Loyle, Helga Malmin Binningsbø

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While armed conflict is ultimately about violent interaction between combatant groups, a variety of policies are pursued in conjunction with violence that contribute to the course of conflict and its outcomes. One underdeveloped area of research is the use of judicial and quasi-judicial processes during armed conflict. These processes, including trials, truth commissions, reparations, amnesties, purges, or exiles, are directly related to the actions and abuses of the conflict itself—a phenomenon we refer to as during-conflict justice (DCJ). To enable researchers to answer questions about when and why governments and rebels resort to these strategies, and to what effect, we created a global, cross-national dataset which includes 2,205 justice processes implemented during 204 internal armed conflicts between 1946 and 2011. Using these data, this article investigates the conditions under which governments and rebels employ DCJ as well as the potential effects of DCJ usage on conflict dynamics and outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)442-466
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Conflict Resolution
Volume62
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

justice
amnesty
Armed conflict
Justice
Government
reparations
exile
abuse
violence
interaction
Group

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{91bb3bc972404f2c99090a8f46785bc3,
title = "Justice during Armed Conflict: A New Dataset on Government and Rebel Strategies",
abstract = "While armed conflict is ultimately about violent interaction between combatant groups, a variety of policies are pursued in conjunction with violence that contribute to the course of conflict and its outcomes. One underdeveloped area of research is the use of judicial and quasi-judicial processes during armed conflict. These processes, including trials, truth commissions, reparations, amnesties, purges, or exiles, are directly related to the actions and abuses of the conflict itself—a phenomenon we refer to as during-conflict justice (DCJ). To enable researchers to answer questions about when and why governments and rebels resort to these strategies, and to what effect, we created a global, cross-national dataset which includes 2,205 justice processes implemented during 204 internal armed conflicts between 1946 and 2011. Using these data, this article investigates the conditions under which governments and rebels employ DCJ as well as the potential effects of DCJ usage on conflict dynamics and outcomes.",
author = "Loyle, {Cyanne E.} and Binningsb{\o}, {Helga Malmin}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0022002716655441",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "442--466",
journal = "Journal of Conflict Resolution",
issn = "0022-0027",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Justice during Armed Conflict : A New Dataset on Government and Rebel Strategies. / Loyle, Cyanne E.; Binningsbø, Helga Malmin.

In: Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 62, No. 2, 01.02.2018, p. 442-466.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Justice during Armed Conflict

T2 - A New Dataset on Government and Rebel Strategies

AU - Loyle, Cyanne E.

AU - Binningsbø, Helga Malmin

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - While armed conflict is ultimately about violent interaction between combatant groups, a variety of policies are pursued in conjunction with violence that contribute to the course of conflict and its outcomes. One underdeveloped area of research is the use of judicial and quasi-judicial processes during armed conflict. These processes, including trials, truth commissions, reparations, amnesties, purges, or exiles, are directly related to the actions and abuses of the conflict itself—a phenomenon we refer to as during-conflict justice (DCJ). To enable researchers to answer questions about when and why governments and rebels resort to these strategies, and to what effect, we created a global, cross-national dataset which includes 2,205 justice processes implemented during 204 internal armed conflicts between 1946 and 2011. Using these data, this article investigates the conditions under which governments and rebels employ DCJ as well as the potential effects of DCJ usage on conflict dynamics and outcomes.

AB - While armed conflict is ultimately about violent interaction between combatant groups, a variety of policies are pursued in conjunction with violence that contribute to the course of conflict and its outcomes. One underdeveloped area of research is the use of judicial and quasi-judicial processes during armed conflict. These processes, including trials, truth commissions, reparations, amnesties, purges, or exiles, are directly related to the actions and abuses of the conflict itself—a phenomenon we refer to as during-conflict justice (DCJ). To enable researchers to answer questions about when and why governments and rebels resort to these strategies, and to what effect, we created a global, cross-national dataset which includes 2,205 justice processes implemented during 204 internal armed conflicts between 1946 and 2011. Using these data, this article investigates the conditions under which governments and rebels employ DCJ as well as the potential effects of DCJ usage on conflict dynamics and outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040839498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040839498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022002716655441

DO - 10.1177/0022002716655441

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85040839498

VL - 62

SP - 442

EP - 466

JO - Journal of Conflict Resolution

JF - Journal of Conflict Resolution

SN - 0022-0027

IS - 2

ER -