Knowing the odds: Parameters that predict passing or failing school district bonds

Alex J. Bowers, Scott Alan Metzger, Matthew Militello

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigates parameters affecting the likelihood of passing school facility construction bonds by local district election. Using statewide data from Michigan, this study analyzes school bond data for urban (n = 30), suburban (n = 164), small town (n = 70), and rural (n = 241) school districts that held capital improvement bond elections from 2000 to 2005. This analysis found four parameters that were significant in predicting either passage or failure of school bonds: bond amount, number of students enrolled, the number of times the bond was attempted, and district urbanicity. Examining district bond passage rates by urbanicity showed that rural districts have worse chances of passing bond elections than urban and suburban districts and that small-town districts have the worst chances of all.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)398-420
Number of pages23
JournalEducational Policy
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2010

Fingerprint

district
school
election
small town
student

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Cite this

Bowers, Alex J. ; Metzger, Scott Alan ; Militello, Matthew. / Knowing the odds : Parameters that predict passing or failing school district bonds. In: Educational Policy. 2010 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 398-420.
@article{1f1bb5d85ecb4e3686de6aafdc801754,
title = "Knowing the odds: Parameters that predict passing or failing school district bonds",
abstract = "This study investigates parameters affecting the likelihood of passing school facility construction bonds by local district election. Using statewide data from Michigan, this study analyzes school bond data for urban (n = 30), suburban (n = 164), small town (n = 70), and rural (n = 241) school districts that held capital improvement bond elections from 2000 to 2005. This analysis found four parameters that were significant in predicting either passage or failure of school bonds: bond amount, number of students enrolled, the number of times the bond was attempted, and district urbanicity. Examining district bond passage rates by urbanicity showed that rural districts have worse chances of passing bond elections than urban and suburban districts and that small-town districts have the worst chances of all.",
author = "Bowers, {Alex J.} and Metzger, {Scott Alan} and Matthew Militello",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0895904808330169",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "398--420",
journal = "Educational Policy",
issn = "0895-9048",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Knowing the odds : Parameters that predict passing or failing school district bonds. / Bowers, Alex J.; Metzger, Scott Alan; Militello, Matthew.

In: Educational Policy, Vol. 24, No. 2, 01.03.2010, p. 398-420.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knowing the odds

T2 - Parameters that predict passing or failing school district bonds

AU - Bowers, Alex J.

AU - Metzger, Scott Alan

AU - Militello, Matthew

PY - 2010/3/1

Y1 - 2010/3/1

N2 - This study investigates parameters affecting the likelihood of passing school facility construction bonds by local district election. Using statewide data from Michigan, this study analyzes school bond data for urban (n = 30), suburban (n = 164), small town (n = 70), and rural (n = 241) school districts that held capital improvement bond elections from 2000 to 2005. This analysis found four parameters that were significant in predicting either passage or failure of school bonds: bond amount, number of students enrolled, the number of times the bond was attempted, and district urbanicity. Examining district bond passage rates by urbanicity showed that rural districts have worse chances of passing bond elections than urban and suburban districts and that small-town districts have the worst chances of all.

AB - This study investigates parameters affecting the likelihood of passing school facility construction bonds by local district election. Using statewide data from Michigan, this study analyzes school bond data for urban (n = 30), suburban (n = 164), small town (n = 70), and rural (n = 241) school districts that held capital improvement bond elections from 2000 to 2005. This analysis found four parameters that were significant in predicting either passage or failure of school bonds: bond amount, number of students enrolled, the number of times the bond was attempted, and district urbanicity. Examining district bond passage rates by urbanicity showed that rural districts have worse chances of passing bond elections than urban and suburban districts and that small-town districts have the worst chances of all.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649257364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77649257364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0895904808330169

DO - 10.1177/0895904808330169

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77649257364

VL - 24

SP - 398

EP - 420

JO - Educational Policy

JF - Educational Policy

SN - 0895-9048

IS - 2

ER -