Knowledge distortion in direct democracy: A longitudinal study of biased empirical beliefs on statewide ballot measures

John Gastil, Justin Reedy, Chris Wells

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study extends a model of political knowledge distortion by tracing the influence of cultural orientations, information exposure, and prior beliefs on changes in knowledge distortion and issue attitudes during the 2010 Oregon general election. Results show strong associations between voters’ cultural orientations and their knowledge distortion in the first survey wave and over time. As hypothesized, orientations had stronger effects on the issues that showed greater cultural divergence. Self-reported exposure to issue-relevant information during the campaign, however, had no direct or interactive effects on voters’ changing factual beliefs. Changes in issue attitudes were associated with voters’ changing factual beliefs and their orientations, with the level of cultural divergence having no consistent influence on the strength of those associations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)540-560
Number of pages21
JournalInternational Journal of Public Opinion Research
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

direct democracy
longitudinal study
divergence
campaign
election

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{39628e107f794d299241e39ba93e68f4,
title = "Knowledge distortion in direct democracy: A longitudinal study of biased empirical beliefs on statewide ballot measures",
abstract = "This study extends a model of political knowledge distortion by tracing the influence of cultural orientations, information exposure, and prior beliefs on changes in knowledge distortion and issue attitudes during the 2010 Oregon general election. Results show strong associations between voters’ cultural orientations and their knowledge distortion in the first survey wave and over time. As hypothesized, orientations had stronger effects on the issues that showed greater cultural divergence. Self-reported exposure to issue-relevant information during the campaign, however, had no direct or interactive effects on voters’ changing factual beliefs. Changes in issue attitudes were associated with voters’ changing factual beliefs and their orientations, with the level of cultural divergence having no consistent influence on the strength of those associations.",
author = "John Gastil and Justin Reedy and Chris Wells",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/ijpor/edx012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "540--560",
journal = "International Journal of Public Opinion Research",
issn = "0954-2892",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

Knowledge distortion in direct democracy : A longitudinal study of biased empirical beliefs on statewide ballot measures. / Gastil, John; Reedy, Justin; Wells, Chris.

In: International Journal of Public Opinion Research, Vol. 30, No. 4, 01.01.2018, p. 540-560.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knowledge distortion in direct democracy

T2 - A longitudinal study of biased empirical beliefs on statewide ballot measures

AU - Gastil, John

AU - Reedy, Justin

AU - Wells, Chris

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This study extends a model of political knowledge distortion by tracing the influence of cultural orientations, information exposure, and prior beliefs on changes in knowledge distortion and issue attitudes during the 2010 Oregon general election. Results show strong associations between voters’ cultural orientations and their knowledge distortion in the first survey wave and over time. As hypothesized, orientations had stronger effects on the issues that showed greater cultural divergence. Self-reported exposure to issue-relevant information during the campaign, however, had no direct or interactive effects on voters’ changing factual beliefs. Changes in issue attitudes were associated with voters’ changing factual beliefs and their orientations, with the level of cultural divergence having no consistent influence on the strength of those associations.

AB - This study extends a model of political knowledge distortion by tracing the influence of cultural orientations, information exposure, and prior beliefs on changes in knowledge distortion and issue attitudes during the 2010 Oregon general election. Results show strong associations between voters’ cultural orientations and their knowledge distortion in the first survey wave and over time. As hypothesized, orientations had stronger effects on the issues that showed greater cultural divergence. Self-reported exposure to issue-relevant information during the campaign, however, had no direct or interactive effects on voters’ changing factual beliefs. Changes in issue attitudes were associated with voters’ changing factual beliefs and their orientations, with the level of cultural divergence having no consistent influence on the strength of those associations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061969439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061969439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ijpor/edx012

DO - 10.1093/ijpor/edx012

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85061969439

VL - 30

SP - 540

EP - 560

JO - International Journal of Public Opinion Research

JF - International Journal of Public Opinion Research

SN - 0954-2892

IS - 4

ER -