Knowledge integration taxonomy in buyer-supplier relationships: Trade-offs between efficiency and innovation

Elena Revilla, Verónica H. Villena

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Based on the knowledge-based view of inter-firm collaboration, this study develops and proposes a parsimonious taxonomy of how buyers and suppliers develop knowledge integration in terms of two mechanisms: joint sense meaning and joint decision making. The first focuses on the interpretation and sense making of knowledge about strategic, relevant issues for the buyer-supplier relationship (BSR). The latter emphasizes joint problem solving related to their interlinked operative routine activities. Using survey data from 130 collaborative BSRs and cluster analysis, the results suggest that buyers that purposely develop a balanced knowledge integration with their suppliers - characterized by managing high levels of both joint sense meaning and joint decision making - show improved efficiency and innovation simultaneously even though they have to deal with the tension of managing the requirements of these two key, albeit competing outcomes. The results also suggest that buyers pursuing focused knowledge integration with their suppliers - characterized by managing high levels of either joint sense meaning or joint decision making - outperform in a specific outcome at the expense of the other. This study thus provides a comprehensive framework that allows organizations to evaluate the knowledge integration strategy that best supports their goals related to their collaborative buyer-supplier relationships.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)854-864
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Production Economics
Volume140
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2012

Fingerprint

Taxonomies
Innovation
Decision making
Cluster analysis
Knowledge integration
Trade-offs
Taxonomy
Buyer-supplier relationships
Suppliers
Buyers

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

Cite this

@article{f2d1894a9b8d4ac1bfac201cede5c420,
title = "Knowledge integration taxonomy in buyer-supplier relationships: Trade-offs between efficiency and innovation",
abstract = "Based on the knowledge-based view of inter-firm collaboration, this study develops and proposes a parsimonious taxonomy of how buyers and suppliers develop knowledge integration in terms of two mechanisms: joint sense meaning and joint decision making. The first focuses on the interpretation and sense making of knowledge about strategic, relevant issues for the buyer-supplier relationship (BSR). The latter emphasizes joint problem solving related to their interlinked operative routine activities. Using survey data from 130 collaborative BSRs and cluster analysis, the results suggest that buyers that purposely develop a balanced knowledge integration with their suppliers - characterized by managing high levels of both joint sense meaning and joint decision making - show improved efficiency and innovation simultaneously even though they have to deal with the tension of managing the requirements of these two key, albeit competing outcomes. The results also suggest that buyers pursuing focused knowledge integration with their suppliers - characterized by managing high levels of either joint sense meaning or joint decision making - outperform in a specific outcome at the expense of the other. This study thus provides a comprehensive framework that allows organizations to evaluate the knowledge integration strategy that best supports their goals related to their collaborative buyer-supplier relationships.",
author = "Elena Revilla and Villena, {Ver{\'o}nica H.}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.07.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "140",
pages = "854--864",
journal = "International Journal of Production Economics",
issn = "0925-5273",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knowledge integration taxonomy in buyer-supplier relationships

T2 - Trade-offs between efficiency and innovation

AU - Revilla, Elena

AU - Villena, Verónica H.

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - Based on the knowledge-based view of inter-firm collaboration, this study develops and proposes a parsimonious taxonomy of how buyers and suppliers develop knowledge integration in terms of two mechanisms: joint sense meaning and joint decision making. The first focuses on the interpretation and sense making of knowledge about strategic, relevant issues for the buyer-supplier relationship (BSR). The latter emphasizes joint problem solving related to their interlinked operative routine activities. Using survey data from 130 collaborative BSRs and cluster analysis, the results suggest that buyers that purposely develop a balanced knowledge integration with their suppliers - characterized by managing high levels of both joint sense meaning and joint decision making - show improved efficiency and innovation simultaneously even though they have to deal with the tension of managing the requirements of these two key, albeit competing outcomes. The results also suggest that buyers pursuing focused knowledge integration with their suppliers - characterized by managing high levels of either joint sense meaning or joint decision making - outperform in a specific outcome at the expense of the other. This study thus provides a comprehensive framework that allows organizations to evaluate the knowledge integration strategy that best supports their goals related to their collaborative buyer-supplier relationships.

AB - Based on the knowledge-based view of inter-firm collaboration, this study develops and proposes a parsimonious taxonomy of how buyers and suppliers develop knowledge integration in terms of two mechanisms: joint sense meaning and joint decision making. The first focuses on the interpretation and sense making of knowledge about strategic, relevant issues for the buyer-supplier relationship (BSR). The latter emphasizes joint problem solving related to their interlinked operative routine activities. Using survey data from 130 collaborative BSRs and cluster analysis, the results suggest that buyers that purposely develop a balanced knowledge integration with their suppliers - characterized by managing high levels of both joint sense meaning and joint decision making - show improved efficiency and innovation simultaneously even though they have to deal with the tension of managing the requirements of these two key, albeit competing outcomes. The results also suggest that buyers pursuing focused knowledge integration with their suppliers - characterized by managing high levels of either joint sense meaning or joint decision making - outperform in a specific outcome at the expense of the other. This study thus provides a comprehensive framework that allows organizations to evaluate the knowledge integration strategy that best supports their goals related to their collaborative buyer-supplier relationships.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866731915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866731915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.07.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.07.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84866731915

VL - 140

SP - 854

EP - 864

JO - International Journal of Production Economics

JF - International Journal of Production Economics

SN - 0925-5273

IS - 2

ER -