Laboratory contamination over time during low-biomass sample analysis

Laura S. Weyrich, Andrew G. Farrer, Raphael Eisenhofer, Luis A. Arriola, Jennifer Young, Caitlin A. Selway, Matilda Handsley-Davis, Christina J. Adler, James Breen, Alan Cooper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Bacteria are not only ubiquitous on earth but can also be incredibly diverse within clean laboratories and reagents. The presence of both living and dead bacteria in laboratory environments and reagents is especially problematic when examining samples with low endogenous content (e.g., skin swabs, tissue biopsies, ice, water, degraded forensic samples or ancient material), where contaminants can outnumber endogenous microorganisms within samples. The contribution of contaminants within high-throughput studies remains poorly understood because of the relatively low number of contaminant surveys. Here, we examined 144 negative control samples (extraction blank and no-template amplification controls) collected in both typical molecular laboratories and an ultraclean ancient DNA laboratory over 5 years to characterize long-term contaminant diversity. We additionally compared the contaminant content within a home-made silica-based extraction method, commonly used to analyse low endogenous content samples, with a widely used commercial DNA extraction kit. The contaminant taxonomic profile of the ultraclean ancient DNA laboratory was unique compared to modern molecular biology laboratories, and changed over time according to researcher, month and season. The commercial kit also contained higher microbial diversity and several human-associated taxa in comparison to the home-made silica extraction protocol. We recommend a minimum of two strategies to reduce the impacts of laboratory contaminants within low-biomass metagenomic studies: (a) extraction blank controls should be included and sequenced with every batch of extractions and (b) the contributions of laboratory contamination should be assessed and reported in each high-throughput metagenomic study.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)982-996
Number of pages15
JournalMolecular Ecology Resources
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Biomass
biomass
pollutant
Metagenomics
sampling
DNA
Silicon Dioxide
silica
Bacteria
bacterium
laboratory
contamination
analysis
bacteria
Ice
extraction method
skin (animal)
molecular biology
Molecular Biology
biopsy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biotechnology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Genetics

Cite this

Weyrich, L. S., Farrer, A. G., Eisenhofer, R., Arriola, L. A., Young, J., Selway, C. A., ... Cooper, A. (2019). Laboratory contamination over time during low-biomass sample analysis. Molecular Ecology Resources, 19(4), 982-996. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13011
Weyrich, Laura S. ; Farrer, Andrew G. ; Eisenhofer, Raphael ; Arriola, Luis A. ; Young, Jennifer ; Selway, Caitlin A. ; Handsley-Davis, Matilda ; Adler, Christina J. ; Breen, James ; Cooper, Alan. / Laboratory contamination over time during low-biomass sample analysis. In: Molecular Ecology Resources. 2019 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 982-996.
@article{c7bb51935aea48d7a63f4253416a6faa,
title = "Laboratory contamination over time during low-biomass sample analysis",
abstract = "Bacteria are not only ubiquitous on earth but can also be incredibly diverse within clean laboratories and reagents. The presence of both living and dead bacteria in laboratory environments and reagents is especially problematic when examining samples with low endogenous content (e.g., skin swabs, tissue biopsies, ice, water, degraded forensic samples or ancient material), where contaminants can outnumber endogenous microorganisms within samples. The contribution of contaminants within high-throughput studies remains poorly understood because of the relatively low number of contaminant surveys. Here, we examined 144 negative control samples (extraction blank and no-template amplification controls) collected in both typical molecular laboratories and an ultraclean ancient DNA laboratory over 5 years to characterize long-term contaminant diversity. We additionally compared the contaminant content within a home-made silica-based extraction method, commonly used to analyse low endogenous content samples, with a widely used commercial DNA extraction kit. The contaminant taxonomic profile of the ultraclean ancient DNA laboratory was unique compared to modern molecular biology laboratories, and changed over time according to researcher, month and season. The commercial kit also contained higher microbial diversity and several human-associated taxa in comparison to the home-made silica extraction protocol. We recommend a minimum of two strategies to reduce the impacts of laboratory contaminants within low-biomass metagenomic studies: (a) extraction blank controls should be included and sequenced with every batch of extractions and (b) the contributions of laboratory contamination should be assessed and reported in each high-throughput metagenomic study.",
author = "Weyrich, {Laura S.} and Farrer, {Andrew G.} and Raphael Eisenhofer and Arriola, {Luis A.} and Jennifer Young and Selway, {Caitlin A.} and Matilda Handsley-Davis and Adler, {Christina J.} and James Breen and Alan Cooper",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/1755-0998.13011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "982--996",
journal = "Molecular Ecology Resources",
issn = "1755-098X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Weyrich, LS, Farrer, AG, Eisenhofer, R, Arriola, LA, Young, J, Selway, CA, Handsley-Davis, M, Adler, CJ, Breen, J & Cooper, A 2019, 'Laboratory contamination over time during low-biomass sample analysis', Molecular Ecology Resources, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 982-996. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13011

Laboratory contamination over time during low-biomass sample analysis. / Weyrich, Laura S.; Farrer, Andrew G.; Eisenhofer, Raphael; Arriola, Luis A.; Young, Jennifer; Selway, Caitlin A.; Handsley-Davis, Matilda; Adler, Christina J.; Breen, James; Cooper, Alan.

In: Molecular Ecology Resources, Vol. 19, No. 4, 07.2019, p. 982-996.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laboratory contamination over time during low-biomass sample analysis

AU - Weyrich, Laura S.

AU - Farrer, Andrew G.

AU - Eisenhofer, Raphael

AU - Arriola, Luis A.

AU - Young, Jennifer

AU - Selway, Caitlin A.

AU - Handsley-Davis, Matilda

AU - Adler, Christina J.

AU - Breen, James

AU - Cooper, Alan

PY - 2019/7

Y1 - 2019/7

N2 - Bacteria are not only ubiquitous on earth but can also be incredibly diverse within clean laboratories and reagents. The presence of both living and dead bacteria in laboratory environments and reagents is especially problematic when examining samples with low endogenous content (e.g., skin swabs, tissue biopsies, ice, water, degraded forensic samples or ancient material), where contaminants can outnumber endogenous microorganisms within samples. The contribution of contaminants within high-throughput studies remains poorly understood because of the relatively low number of contaminant surveys. Here, we examined 144 negative control samples (extraction blank and no-template amplification controls) collected in both typical molecular laboratories and an ultraclean ancient DNA laboratory over 5 years to characterize long-term contaminant diversity. We additionally compared the contaminant content within a home-made silica-based extraction method, commonly used to analyse low endogenous content samples, with a widely used commercial DNA extraction kit. The contaminant taxonomic profile of the ultraclean ancient DNA laboratory was unique compared to modern molecular biology laboratories, and changed over time according to researcher, month and season. The commercial kit also contained higher microbial diversity and several human-associated taxa in comparison to the home-made silica extraction protocol. We recommend a minimum of two strategies to reduce the impacts of laboratory contaminants within low-biomass metagenomic studies: (a) extraction blank controls should be included and sequenced with every batch of extractions and (b) the contributions of laboratory contamination should be assessed and reported in each high-throughput metagenomic study.

AB - Bacteria are not only ubiquitous on earth but can also be incredibly diverse within clean laboratories and reagents. The presence of both living and dead bacteria in laboratory environments and reagents is especially problematic when examining samples with low endogenous content (e.g., skin swabs, tissue biopsies, ice, water, degraded forensic samples or ancient material), where contaminants can outnumber endogenous microorganisms within samples. The contribution of contaminants within high-throughput studies remains poorly understood because of the relatively low number of contaminant surveys. Here, we examined 144 negative control samples (extraction blank and no-template amplification controls) collected in both typical molecular laboratories and an ultraclean ancient DNA laboratory over 5 years to characterize long-term contaminant diversity. We additionally compared the contaminant content within a home-made silica-based extraction method, commonly used to analyse low endogenous content samples, with a widely used commercial DNA extraction kit. The contaminant taxonomic profile of the ultraclean ancient DNA laboratory was unique compared to modern molecular biology laboratories, and changed over time according to researcher, month and season. The commercial kit also contained higher microbial diversity and several human-associated taxa in comparison to the home-made silica extraction protocol. We recommend a minimum of two strategies to reduce the impacts of laboratory contaminants within low-biomass metagenomic studies: (a) extraction blank controls should be included and sequenced with every batch of extractions and (b) the contributions of laboratory contamination should be assessed and reported in each high-throughput metagenomic study.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067543196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067543196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1755-0998.13011

DO - 10.1111/1755-0998.13011

M3 - Article

C2 - 30887686

AN - SCOPUS:85067543196

VL - 19

SP - 982

EP - 996

JO - Molecular Ecology Resources

JF - Molecular Ecology Resources

SN - 1755-098X

IS - 4

ER -