Laparoscopic gastric bypass to robotic gastric bypass: time and cost commitment involved in training and transitioning an academic surgical practice

Jerome R. Lyn-Sue, Josh S. Winder, Shannon Kotch, Jacob Colello, Salvatore Docimo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the gold standard procedure for weight loss. This relatively complex procedure has excellent outcomes when performed via laparoscopy. The advent of the DaVinci robotic platform has been a technological advancement. Our goal is to provide information regarding the cost, time commitment, and advantages of transitioning an LRYGB program to an RRYGB program in an academic setting. We retrospectively reviewed the last 25 laparoscopic gastric bypass procedures and the first 25 robotic gastric bypass procedures performed by a single surgeon. We compared clinical outcomes and focused on time and hospital cost during this transition phase. There was no significant demographic difference between the groups. The mean age was 41.7 (RRYGB) years vs 43.4 (LRYGM) years. The mean BMI were similar between groups, 45.3 vs 46.5 kg/m2 for RRYGB and LRYGB. No anastomotic leaks or mortalities were noted. There was one anastomotic stricture in both groups. Excess weight loss was similar in both groups at 1 year. There was a significant increase in operative time with RRYGB, mean 241 min vs mean 174 min (p = 0.0005). Operative time fell by 25 min after the first 10 cases. The hospital cost was also increased with RRYGB mean $5922 vs $4395 (p = 0.03). Transitioning from a laparoscopic to a robotic practice can be done safely, however, the initial operative times were longer and the hospital cost was higher for robotic gastric bypass. We hope in the future that these will decrease after overcoming the learning and as the technology becomes widespread.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)111-115
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Robotic Surgery
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

Gastric Bypass
Robotics
Hospital Costs
Teaching
Operative Time
Costs and Cost Analysis
Weight Loss
Anastomotic Leak
Phase Transition
Laparoscopy
Pathologic Constriction
Demography
Learning
Technology
Mortality

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Health Informatics

Cite this

@article{d34448e924124a9b87bf60a89d2657eb,
title = "Laparoscopic gastric bypass to robotic gastric bypass: time and cost commitment involved in training and transitioning an academic surgical practice",
abstract = "The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the gold standard procedure for weight loss. This relatively complex procedure has excellent outcomes when performed via laparoscopy. The advent of the DaVinci robotic platform has been a technological advancement. Our goal is to provide information regarding the cost, time commitment, and advantages of transitioning an LRYGB program to an RRYGB program in an academic setting. We retrospectively reviewed the last 25 laparoscopic gastric bypass procedures and the first 25 robotic gastric bypass procedures performed by a single surgeon. We compared clinical outcomes and focused on time and hospital cost during this transition phase. There was no significant demographic difference between the groups. The mean age was 41.7 (RRYGB) years vs 43.4 (LRYGM) years. The mean BMI were similar between groups, 45.3 vs 46.5 kg/m2 for RRYGB and LRYGB. No anastomotic leaks or mortalities were noted. There was one anastomotic stricture in both groups. Excess weight loss was similar in both groups at 1 year. There was a significant increase in operative time with RRYGB, mean 241 min vs mean 174 min (p = 0.0005). Operative time fell by 25 min after the first 10 cases. The hospital cost was also increased with RRYGB mean $5922 vs $4395 (p = 0.03). Transitioning from a laparoscopic to a robotic practice can be done safely, however, the initial operative times were longer and the hospital cost was higher for robotic gastric bypass. We hope in the future that these will decrease after overcoming the learning and as the technology becomes widespread.",
author = "Lyn-Sue, {Jerome R.} and Winder, {Josh S.} and Shannon Kotch and Jacob Colello and Salvatore Docimo",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11701-016-0567-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "111--115",
journal = "Journal of Robotic Surgery",
issn = "1863-2483",
publisher = "Springer London",
number = "2",

}

Laparoscopic gastric bypass to robotic gastric bypass : time and cost commitment involved in training and transitioning an academic surgical practice. / Lyn-Sue, Jerome R.; Winder, Josh S.; Kotch, Shannon; Colello, Jacob; Docimo, Salvatore.

In: Journal of Robotic Surgery, Vol. 10, No. 2, 01.06.2016, p. 111-115.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic gastric bypass to robotic gastric bypass

T2 - time and cost commitment involved in training and transitioning an academic surgical practice

AU - Lyn-Sue, Jerome R.

AU - Winder, Josh S.

AU - Kotch, Shannon

AU - Colello, Jacob

AU - Docimo, Salvatore

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the gold standard procedure for weight loss. This relatively complex procedure has excellent outcomes when performed via laparoscopy. The advent of the DaVinci robotic platform has been a technological advancement. Our goal is to provide information regarding the cost, time commitment, and advantages of transitioning an LRYGB program to an RRYGB program in an academic setting. We retrospectively reviewed the last 25 laparoscopic gastric bypass procedures and the first 25 robotic gastric bypass procedures performed by a single surgeon. We compared clinical outcomes and focused on time and hospital cost during this transition phase. There was no significant demographic difference between the groups. The mean age was 41.7 (RRYGB) years vs 43.4 (LRYGM) years. The mean BMI were similar between groups, 45.3 vs 46.5 kg/m2 for RRYGB and LRYGB. No anastomotic leaks or mortalities were noted. There was one anastomotic stricture in both groups. Excess weight loss was similar in both groups at 1 year. There was a significant increase in operative time with RRYGB, mean 241 min vs mean 174 min (p = 0.0005). Operative time fell by 25 min after the first 10 cases. The hospital cost was also increased with RRYGB mean $5922 vs $4395 (p = 0.03). Transitioning from a laparoscopic to a robotic practice can be done safely, however, the initial operative times were longer and the hospital cost was higher for robotic gastric bypass. We hope in the future that these will decrease after overcoming the learning and as the technology becomes widespread.

AB - The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the gold standard procedure for weight loss. This relatively complex procedure has excellent outcomes when performed via laparoscopy. The advent of the DaVinci robotic platform has been a technological advancement. Our goal is to provide information regarding the cost, time commitment, and advantages of transitioning an LRYGB program to an RRYGB program in an academic setting. We retrospectively reviewed the last 25 laparoscopic gastric bypass procedures and the first 25 robotic gastric bypass procedures performed by a single surgeon. We compared clinical outcomes and focused on time and hospital cost during this transition phase. There was no significant demographic difference between the groups. The mean age was 41.7 (RRYGB) years vs 43.4 (LRYGM) years. The mean BMI were similar between groups, 45.3 vs 46.5 kg/m2 for RRYGB and LRYGB. No anastomotic leaks or mortalities were noted. There was one anastomotic stricture in both groups. Excess weight loss was similar in both groups at 1 year. There was a significant increase in operative time with RRYGB, mean 241 min vs mean 174 min (p = 0.0005). Operative time fell by 25 min after the first 10 cases. The hospital cost was also increased with RRYGB mean $5922 vs $4395 (p = 0.03). Transitioning from a laparoscopic to a robotic practice can be done safely, however, the initial operative times were longer and the hospital cost was higher for robotic gastric bypass. We hope in the future that these will decrease after overcoming the learning and as the technology becomes widespread.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961223845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961223845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11701-016-0567-y

DO - 10.1007/s11701-016-0567-y

M3 - Article

C2 - 26983848

AN - SCOPUS:84961223845

VL - 10

SP - 111

EP - 115

JO - Journal of Robotic Surgery

JF - Journal of Robotic Surgery

SN - 1863-2483

IS - 2

ER -