Lapse-and-Reentry in Variable Annuities

Thorsten Moenig, Nan Zhu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Section 1035 of the current U.S. tax code allows policyholders to exchange their variable annuity policy for a similar product while maintaining tax-deferred status. When the variable annuity contains a long-term guarantee, this “lapse-and-reentry” strategy allows the policyholder to potentially increase the value of the embedded guarantee. We show that for a return-of-premium death benefit guarantee this is frequently optimal, which has severe repercussions for pricing. We analyze various policy features that may help mitigate the incentive to lapse and compare them regarding the insurer's average expense payments and their posttax utility to the policyholder. We find that a ratchet-type guarantee and a state-dependent fee structure best mitigate the lapse-and-reentry problem, outperforming the typical surrender schedule. Further, when accounting for proper tax treatment, the policyholder prefers a variable annuity with either of these three policy features over a comparable stock investment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)911-938
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Risk and Insurance
Volume85
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Variable annuities
Reentry
Guarantee
Tax
Pricing
Incentives
Schedule
Expenses
Premium
Payment
Fees
Deferred taxes
Insurer

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Moenig, Thorsten ; Zhu, Nan. / Lapse-and-Reentry in Variable Annuities. In: Journal of Risk and Insurance. 2018 ; Vol. 85, No. 4. pp. 911-938.
@article{a83b74e8f4ea437a82880c4a95632147,
title = "Lapse-and-Reentry in Variable Annuities",
abstract = "Section 1035 of the current U.S. tax code allows policyholders to exchange their variable annuity policy for a similar product while maintaining tax-deferred status. When the variable annuity contains a long-term guarantee, this “lapse-and-reentry” strategy allows the policyholder to potentially increase the value of the embedded guarantee. We show that for a return-of-premium death benefit guarantee this is frequently optimal, which has severe repercussions for pricing. We analyze various policy features that may help mitigate the incentive to lapse and compare them regarding the insurer's average expense payments and their posttax utility to the policyholder. We find that a ratchet-type guarantee and a state-dependent fee structure best mitigate the lapse-and-reentry problem, outperforming the typical surrender schedule. Further, when accounting for proper tax treatment, the policyholder prefers a variable annuity with either of these three policy features over a comparable stock investment.",
author = "Thorsten Moenig and Nan Zhu",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jori.12171",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "911--938",
journal = "Journal of Risk and Insurance",
issn = "0022-4367",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Lapse-and-Reentry in Variable Annuities. / Moenig, Thorsten; Zhu, Nan.

In: Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol. 85, No. 4, 01.12.2018, p. 911-938.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lapse-and-Reentry in Variable Annuities

AU - Moenig, Thorsten

AU - Zhu, Nan

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Section 1035 of the current U.S. tax code allows policyholders to exchange their variable annuity policy for a similar product while maintaining tax-deferred status. When the variable annuity contains a long-term guarantee, this “lapse-and-reentry” strategy allows the policyholder to potentially increase the value of the embedded guarantee. We show that for a return-of-premium death benefit guarantee this is frequently optimal, which has severe repercussions for pricing. We analyze various policy features that may help mitigate the incentive to lapse and compare them regarding the insurer's average expense payments and their posttax utility to the policyholder. We find that a ratchet-type guarantee and a state-dependent fee structure best mitigate the lapse-and-reentry problem, outperforming the typical surrender schedule. Further, when accounting for proper tax treatment, the policyholder prefers a variable annuity with either of these three policy features over a comparable stock investment.

AB - Section 1035 of the current U.S. tax code allows policyholders to exchange their variable annuity policy for a similar product while maintaining tax-deferred status. When the variable annuity contains a long-term guarantee, this “lapse-and-reentry” strategy allows the policyholder to potentially increase the value of the embedded guarantee. We show that for a return-of-premium death benefit guarantee this is frequently optimal, which has severe repercussions for pricing. We analyze various policy features that may help mitigate the incentive to lapse and compare them regarding the insurer's average expense payments and their posttax utility to the policyholder. We find that a ratchet-type guarantee and a state-dependent fee structure best mitigate the lapse-and-reentry problem, outperforming the typical surrender schedule. Further, when accounting for proper tax treatment, the policyholder prefers a variable annuity with either of these three policy features over a comparable stock investment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006459116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006459116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jori.12171

DO - 10.1111/jori.12171

M3 - Article

VL - 85

SP - 911

EP - 938

JO - Journal of Risk and Insurance

JF - Journal of Risk and Insurance

SN - 0022-4367

IS - 4

ER -