Large-scale assessment, rationality, and scientific management: The case of no child left behind

Andrew T. Roach, Jennifer L. Frank

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the ways in which NCLB and the movement towards large-scale assessment systems are based on Weber's concept of formal rationality and tradition of scientific management. Building on these ideas, the authors use Ritzer's McDonaldization thesis to examine some of the core features of large-scale assessment and accountability systems. According to Ritzer, McDonaldized systems and routines are characterized by four central features: (a) a pursuit of efficiency; (b) emphasis on calculability or quantification of outcomes; (c) predictability and uniformity; and (d) control through nonhuman technologies. Strengths and shortcomings of each of these features for schools and educators are discussed. The article concludes with ideas and strategies for school psychologists interested in maximizing the benefits and minimizing the negative outcomes of large-scale assessment and accountability systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7-25
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Applied School Psychology
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2006

Fingerprint

Social Responsibility
Case Management
rationality
management
Psychology
Technology
responsibility
school psychologist
quantification
educator
efficiency
school

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

@article{ebcd086497264e1fbf9bf0d7d0b60eca,
title = "Large-scale assessment, rationality, and scientific management: The case of no child left behind",
abstract = "This article examines the ways in which NCLB and the movement towards large-scale assessment systems are based on Weber's concept of formal rationality and tradition of scientific management. Building on these ideas, the authors use Ritzer's McDonaldization thesis to examine some of the core features of large-scale assessment and accountability systems. According to Ritzer, McDonaldized systems and routines are characterized by four central features: (a) a pursuit of efficiency; (b) emphasis on calculability or quantification of outcomes; (c) predictability and uniformity; and (d) control through nonhuman technologies. Strengths and shortcomings of each of these features for schools and educators are discussed. The article concludes with ideas and strategies for school psychologists interested in maximizing the benefits and minimizing the negative outcomes of large-scale assessment and accountability systems.",
author = "Roach, {Andrew T.} and Frank, {Jennifer L.}",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1300/J370v23n02_02",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "7--25",
journal = "Journal of Applied School Psychology",
issn = "1537-7903",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Large-scale assessment, rationality, and scientific management : The case of no child left behind. / Roach, Andrew T.; Frank, Jennifer L.

In: Journal of Applied School Psychology, Vol. 23, No. 2, 01.12.2006, p. 7-25.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Large-scale assessment, rationality, and scientific management

T2 - The case of no child left behind

AU - Roach, Andrew T.

AU - Frank, Jennifer L.

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - This article examines the ways in which NCLB and the movement towards large-scale assessment systems are based on Weber's concept of formal rationality and tradition of scientific management. Building on these ideas, the authors use Ritzer's McDonaldization thesis to examine some of the core features of large-scale assessment and accountability systems. According to Ritzer, McDonaldized systems and routines are characterized by four central features: (a) a pursuit of efficiency; (b) emphasis on calculability or quantification of outcomes; (c) predictability and uniformity; and (d) control through nonhuman technologies. Strengths and shortcomings of each of these features for schools and educators are discussed. The article concludes with ideas and strategies for school psychologists interested in maximizing the benefits and minimizing the negative outcomes of large-scale assessment and accountability systems.

AB - This article examines the ways in which NCLB and the movement towards large-scale assessment systems are based on Weber's concept of formal rationality and tradition of scientific management. Building on these ideas, the authors use Ritzer's McDonaldization thesis to examine some of the core features of large-scale assessment and accountability systems. According to Ritzer, McDonaldized systems and routines are characterized by four central features: (a) a pursuit of efficiency; (b) emphasis on calculability or quantification of outcomes; (c) predictability and uniformity; and (d) control through nonhuman technologies. Strengths and shortcomings of each of these features for schools and educators are discussed. The article concludes with ideas and strategies for school psychologists interested in maximizing the benefits and minimizing the negative outcomes of large-scale assessment and accountability systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61449266526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61449266526&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1300/J370v23n02_02

DO - 10.1300/J370v23n02_02

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:61449266526

VL - 23

SP - 7

EP - 25

JO - Journal of Applied School Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied School Psychology

SN - 1537-7903

IS - 2

ER -