TY - JOUR
T1 - Latent Neuropsychological Profiles to Discriminate Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Active-Duty Service Members
AU - Esopenko, Carrie
AU - De Souza, Nicola L.
AU - Jia, Yuane
AU - Parrott, J. Scott
AU - Merkley, Tricia L.
AU - Dennis, Emily L.
AU - Hillary, Frank G.
AU - Velez, Carmen
AU - Cooper, Douglas B.
AU - Kennedy, Jan
AU - Lewis, Jeffrey
AU - York, Gerald
AU - Menefee, Deleene S.
AU - McCauley, Stephen R.
AU - Bowles, Amy O.
AU - Wilde, Elisabeth A.
AU - Tate, David F.
N1 - Funding Information:
Carrie Esopenko has received presentation honoraria from New York University. Douglas B. Cooper is employed as a researcher by the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center and the Foundation for Advancing Veterans Health Research. Amy O. Bowles is currently receiving grants (W81XWH-18-2-0070, W81XWH-11-2-0222, and W81XWH-15-PORP-ARA) through the Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (CDMRP).
Funding Information:
This work is supported in part by the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Centers, the US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (USAMRMC; W81XWH-13-2-0025), and also supported by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs endorsed by the Department of Defense, through the Psychological Health/Traumatic Brain Injury Research Program LongTerm Impact of Military Relevant Brain Injury Consortium (LIMBIC) Award W81XWH18PH/TBIRPLIMBIC under Awards No. W81XWH1920067 and W81XWH1320095, and by the US Department of Veterans Affairs Awards No. I01 CX002097, I01 CX002096, I01 HX003155, I01 RX003444, I01 RX003443, I01 RX003442, I01 CX001135, I01 CX001246, I01 RX001774, I01 RX 001135, I01 RX 002076, I01 RX 001880, I01 RX 002172, I01 RX 002173, I01 RX 002171, I01 RX 002174, and I01 RX 002170. The US Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity, 839 Chandler St, Fort Detrick, Maryland, is the awarding and administering acquisition office. This work is also supported in part by R61NS120249 to Frank G. Hillary, Emily L. Dennis, David F. Tate, and Elisabeth A. Wilde. Financial support was provided to Carrie Esopenko through the School of Health Professions at Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/11/1
Y1 - 2022/11/1
N2 - Objective: To determine whether cognitive and psychological symptom profiles differentiate clinical diagnostic classifications (eg, history of mild traumatic brain injury [mTBI] and posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD]) in military personnel. Methods: US Active-Duty Service Members (N = 209, 89% male) with a history of mTBI (n = 56), current PTSD (n = 23), combined mTBI + PTSD (n = 70), or orthopedic injury controls (n = 60) completed a neuropsychological battery assessing cognitive and psychological functioning. Latent profile analysis was performed to determine how neuropsychological outcomes of individuals clustered together. Diagnostic classifications (ie, mTBI, PTSD, mTBI + PTSD, and orthopedic injury controls) within each symptom profile were examined. Results: A 5-profile model had the best fit. The profiles differentiated subgroups with high (34.0%) or normal (21.5%) cognitive and psychological functioning, cognitive symptoms (19.1%), psychological symptoms (15.3%), and combined cognitive and psychological symptoms (10.0%). The symptom profiles differentiated participants as would generally be expected. Participants with PTSD were mainly represented in the psychological symptom subgroup, while orthopedic injury controls were mainly represented in the high-functioning subgroup. Further, approximately 79% of participants with comorbid mTBI and PTSD were represented in a symptomatic group (∼24% = cognitive symptoms, ∼29% = psychological symptoms, and 26% = combined cognitive/psychological symptoms). Our results also showed that approximately 70% of military personnel with a history of mTBI were represented in the high-and normal-functioning groups. Conclusions: These results demonstrate both overlapping and heterogeneous symptom and performance profiles in military personnel with a history of mTBI, PTSD, and/or mTBI + PTSD. The overlapping profiles may underscore why these diagnoses are often difficult to diagnose and treat, but suggest that advanced statistical models may aid in identifying profiles representing symptom and cognitive performance impairments within patient groups and enable identification of more effective treatment targets.
AB - Objective: To determine whether cognitive and psychological symptom profiles differentiate clinical diagnostic classifications (eg, history of mild traumatic brain injury [mTBI] and posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD]) in military personnel. Methods: US Active-Duty Service Members (N = 209, 89% male) with a history of mTBI (n = 56), current PTSD (n = 23), combined mTBI + PTSD (n = 70), or orthopedic injury controls (n = 60) completed a neuropsychological battery assessing cognitive and psychological functioning. Latent profile analysis was performed to determine how neuropsychological outcomes of individuals clustered together. Diagnostic classifications (ie, mTBI, PTSD, mTBI + PTSD, and orthopedic injury controls) within each symptom profile were examined. Results: A 5-profile model had the best fit. The profiles differentiated subgroups with high (34.0%) or normal (21.5%) cognitive and psychological functioning, cognitive symptoms (19.1%), psychological symptoms (15.3%), and combined cognitive and psychological symptoms (10.0%). The symptom profiles differentiated participants as would generally be expected. Participants with PTSD were mainly represented in the psychological symptom subgroup, while orthopedic injury controls were mainly represented in the high-functioning subgroup. Further, approximately 79% of participants with comorbid mTBI and PTSD were represented in a symptomatic group (∼24% = cognitive symptoms, ∼29% = psychological symptoms, and 26% = combined cognitive/psychological symptoms). Our results also showed that approximately 70% of military personnel with a history of mTBI were represented in the high-and normal-functioning groups. Conclusions: These results demonstrate both overlapping and heterogeneous symptom and performance profiles in military personnel with a history of mTBI, PTSD, and/or mTBI + PTSD. The overlapping profiles may underscore why these diagnoses are often difficult to diagnose and treat, but suggest that advanced statistical models may aid in identifying profiles representing symptom and cognitive performance impairments within patient groups and enable identification of more effective treatment targets.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142173515&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85142173515&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000779
DO - 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000779
M3 - Article
C2 - 35452025
AN - SCOPUS:85142173515
SN - 0885-9701
VL - 37
SP - E438-E448
JO - Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
JF - Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
IS - 6
ER -