Latent variable models are network models

Peter C.M. Molenaar

doi:10.1017/S0140525X10000798

Latent variable models are network models

Peter C.M. Molenaar

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Cramer et al. present an original and interesting network perspective on comorbidity and contrast this perspective with a more traditional interpretation of comorbidity in terms of latent variable theory. My commentary focuses on the relationship between the two perspectives; that is, it aims to qualify the presumed contrast between interpretations in terms of networks and latent variables.

Original language	English (US)
Number of pages	1
Journal	Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume	33
Issue number	2-3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000798
State	Published - Jun 2010

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Physiology
Behavioral Neuroscience

Access to Document

10.1017/S0140525X10000798

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Latent variable models are network models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{0784c587bec34443b5f714a1d8771e84,

title = "Latent variable models are network models",

abstract = "Cramer et al. present an original and interesting network perspective on comorbidity and contrast this perspective with a more traditional interpretation of comorbidity in terms of latent variable theory. My commentary focuses on the relationship between the two perspectives; that is, it aims to qualify the presumed contrast between interpretations in terms of networks and latent variables.",

author = "Molenaar, {Peter C.M.}",

year = "2010",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1017/S0140525X10000798",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "33",

journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",

issn = "0140-525X",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Latent variable models are network models

AU - Molenaar, Peter C.M.

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Cramer et al. present an original and interesting network perspective on comorbidity and contrast this perspective with a more traditional interpretation of comorbidity in terms of latent variable theory. My commentary focuses on the relationship between the two perspectives; that is, it aims to qualify the presumed contrast between interpretations in terms of networks and latent variables.

AB - Cramer et al. present an original and interesting network perspective on comorbidity and contrast this perspective with a more traditional interpretation of comorbidity in terms of latent variable theory. My commentary focuses on the relationship between the two perspectives; that is, it aims to qualify the presumed contrast between interpretations in terms of networks and latent variables.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954554546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954554546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X10000798

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X10000798

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 20584385

AN - SCOPUS:77954554546

VL - 33

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 0140-525X

IS - 2-3

ER -