Lateralized motor control processes determine asymmetry of interlimb transfer

Robert L. Sainburg, Sydney Y. Schaefer, Vivek Yadav

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This experiment tested the hypothesis that interlimb transfer of motor performance depends on recruitment of motor control processes that are specialized to the hemisphere contralateral to the arm that is initially trained. Right-handed participants performed a single-joint task, in which reaches were targeted to 4 different distances. While the speed and accuracy was similar for both hands, the underlying control mechanisms used to vary movement speed with distance were systematically different between the arms: the amplitude of the initial acceleration profiles scaled greater with movement speed for the right-dominant arm, while the duration of the initial acceleration profile scaled greater with movement speed for the left-non-dominant arm. These two processes were previously shown to be differentially disrupted by left and right hemisphere damage, respectively. We now hypothesize that task practice with the right arm might reinforce left-hemisphere mechanisms that vary acceleration amplitude with distance, while practice with the left arm might reinforce right-hemisphere mechanisms that vary acceleration duration with distance. We thus predict that following right arm practice, the left arm should show increased contributions of acceleration amplitude to peak velocities, and following left arm practice, the right arm should show increased contributions of acceleration duration to peak velocities. Our findings support these predictions, indicating that asymmetry in interlimb transfer of motor performance, at least in the task used here, depends on recruitment of lateralized motor control processes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)26-38
Number of pages13
JournalNeuroscience
Volume334
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 15 2016

Fingerprint

Arm
Hand
Joints

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Sainburg, Robert L. ; Schaefer, Sydney Y. ; Yadav, Vivek. / Lateralized motor control processes determine asymmetry of interlimb transfer. In: Neuroscience. 2016 ; Vol. 334. pp. 26-38.
@article{dbcb39edfc0942f8aac7042c97f7aaea,
title = "Lateralized motor control processes determine asymmetry of interlimb transfer",
abstract = "This experiment tested the hypothesis that interlimb transfer of motor performance depends on recruitment of motor control processes that are specialized to the hemisphere contralateral to the arm that is initially trained. Right-handed participants performed a single-joint task, in which reaches were targeted to 4 different distances. While the speed and accuracy was similar for both hands, the underlying control mechanisms used to vary movement speed with distance were systematically different between the arms: the amplitude of the initial acceleration profiles scaled greater with movement speed for the right-dominant arm, while the duration of the initial acceleration profile scaled greater with movement speed for the left-non-dominant arm. These two processes were previously shown to be differentially disrupted by left and right hemisphere damage, respectively. We now hypothesize that task practice with the right arm might reinforce left-hemisphere mechanisms that vary acceleration amplitude with distance, while practice with the left arm might reinforce right-hemisphere mechanisms that vary acceleration duration with distance. We thus predict that following right arm practice, the left arm should show increased contributions of acceleration amplitude to peak velocities, and following left arm practice, the right arm should show increased contributions of acceleration duration to peak velocities. Our findings support these predictions, indicating that asymmetry in interlimb transfer of motor performance, at least in the task used here, depends on recruitment of lateralized motor control processes.",
author = "Sainburg, {Robert L.} and Schaefer, {Sydney Y.} and Vivek Yadav",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.07.043",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "334",
pages = "26--38",
journal = "Neuroscience",
issn = "0306-4522",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Lateralized motor control processes determine asymmetry of interlimb transfer. / Sainburg, Robert L.; Schaefer, Sydney Y.; Yadav, Vivek.

In: Neuroscience, Vol. 334, 15.10.2016, p. 26-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lateralized motor control processes determine asymmetry of interlimb transfer

AU - Sainburg, Robert L.

AU - Schaefer, Sydney Y.

AU - Yadav, Vivek

PY - 2016/10/15

Y1 - 2016/10/15

N2 - This experiment tested the hypothesis that interlimb transfer of motor performance depends on recruitment of motor control processes that are specialized to the hemisphere contralateral to the arm that is initially trained. Right-handed participants performed a single-joint task, in which reaches were targeted to 4 different distances. While the speed and accuracy was similar for both hands, the underlying control mechanisms used to vary movement speed with distance were systematically different between the arms: the amplitude of the initial acceleration profiles scaled greater with movement speed for the right-dominant arm, while the duration of the initial acceleration profile scaled greater with movement speed for the left-non-dominant arm. These two processes were previously shown to be differentially disrupted by left and right hemisphere damage, respectively. We now hypothesize that task practice with the right arm might reinforce left-hemisphere mechanisms that vary acceleration amplitude with distance, while practice with the left arm might reinforce right-hemisphere mechanisms that vary acceleration duration with distance. We thus predict that following right arm practice, the left arm should show increased contributions of acceleration amplitude to peak velocities, and following left arm practice, the right arm should show increased contributions of acceleration duration to peak velocities. Our findings support these predictions, indicating that asymmetry in interlimb transfer of motor performance, at least in the task used here, depends on recruitment of lateralized motor control processes.

AB - This experiment tested the hypothesis that interlimb transfer of motor performance depends on recruitment of motor control processes that are specialized to the hemisphere contralateral to the arm that is initially trained. Right-handed participants performed a single-joint task, in which reaches were targeted to 4 different distances. While the speed and accuracy was similar for both hands, the underlying control mechanisms used to vary movement speed with distance were systematically different between the arms: the amplitude of the initial acceleration profiles scaled greater with movement speed for the right-dominant arm, while the duration of the initial acceleration profile scaled greater with movement speed for the left-non-dominant arm. These two processes were previously shown to be differentially disrupted by left and right hemisphere damage, respectively. We now hypothesize that task practice with the right arm might reinforce left-hemisphere mechanisms that vary acceleration amplitude with distance, while practice with the left arm might reinforce right-hemisphere mechanisms that vary acceleration duration with distance. We thus predict that following right arm practice, the left arm should show increased contributions of acceleration amplitude to peak velocities, and following left arm practice, the right arm should show increased contributions of acceleration duration to peak velocities. Our findings support these predictions, indicating that asymmetry in interlimb transfer of motor performance, at least in the task used here, depends on recruitment of lateralized motor control processes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981323609&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981323609&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.07.043

DO - 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.07.043

M3 - Article

C2 - 27491479

AN - SCOPUS:84981323609

VL - 334

SP - 26

EP - 38

JO - Neuroscience

JF - Neuroscience

SN - 0306-4522

ER -