Lead-free piezoelectric ceramics vs. PZT?

Shujun Zhang, Ru Xia, Thomas R. Shrout

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

299 Scopus citations

Abstract

Investigations in the development of lead-free piezoelectric ceramics have recently claimed properties comparable to that of PZT-based materials. In this work, the dielectric and piezoelectric properties of the various systems were contrasted in relation to their respective Curie temperatures. Analogous to PZT, enhanced properties are noted for morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) compositions in the Na,BiTiO3-BaTiO3 and the ternary system with K,BiTiO3, but offer properties significantly lower than that of PZTs. The consequence of a ferroelectric to antiferroelectric transition well below T C further limits their usefulness. Though comparable with respect to T C, enhanced properties reported in the K,NaNbO 3 family are the result of increased polarizability associated with the T orthor-tetragonal polymorphic phase transition being compositionally shifted downward and not from a MPB as widely reported. As expected, the properties are strongly temperature dependent unlike that observed for MPB systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)251-257
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Electroceramics
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2007

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Ceramics and Composites
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Materials Chemistry

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Lead-free piezoelectric ceramics vs. PZT?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this