Leader social accounts of subordinates' Unethical behavior: Examining observer reactions to leader social accounts with moral disengagement language

Carolyn Dang, Elizabeth E. Umphress, Marie S. Mitchell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When providing social accounts (Sitkin & Bies, 1993) for the unethical conduct of subordinates, leaders may use language consistent with cognitive strategies described by Bandura (1991, 1999) in his work on moral disengagement. That is, leader's social accounts may reframe or reconstrue subordinates' unethical conduct such that it appears less reprehensible. We predict observers will respond negatively to leaders when they use moral disengagement language within social accounts and, specifically, observers will ostracize these leaders. In addition, we predict that observer moral disengagement propensity moderates this effect, such that the relationship between leaders' use of moral disengagement language within a social account and ostracism is stronger when observer moral disengagement propensity is lower versus higher. Finally, we predict that the reason why observers ostracize the leader is because observers perceive the leader's social account with moral disengagement language as unethical. Thus, perceived leader social account ethicality is predicted to mediate the interaction effect of leader's use of moral disengagement language within social accounts and observer moral disengagement propensity on ostracism. Results from an experiment and field study support our predictions. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1448-1461
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume102
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2017

Fingerprint

Language

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

@article{815b6c5ee3b944a388a9110941eae210,
title = "Leader social accounts of subordinates' Unethical behavior: Examining observer reactions to leader social accounts with moral disengagement language",
abstract = "When providing social accounts (Sitkin & Bies, 1993) for the unethical conduct of subordinates, leaders may use language consistent with cognitive strategies described by Bandura (1991, 1999) in his work on moral disengagement. That is, leader's social accounts may reframe or reconstrue subordinates' unethical conduct such that it appears less reprehensible. We predict observers will respond negatively to leaders when they use moral disengagement language within social accounts and, specifically, observers will ostracize these leaders. In addition, we predict that observer moral disengagement propensity moderates this effect, such that the relationship between leaders' use of moral disengagement language within a social account and ostracism is stronger when observer moral disengagement propensity is lower versus higher. Finally, we predict that the reason why observers ostracize the leader is because observers perceive the leader's social account with moral disengagement language as unethical. Thus, perceived leader social account ethicality is predicted to mediate the interaction effect of leader's use of moral disengagement language within social accounts and observer moral disengagement propensity on ostracism. Results from an experiment and field study support our predictions. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.",
author = "Carolyn Dang and Umphress, {Elizabeth E.} and Mitchell, {Marie S.}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/apl0000233",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "102",
pages = "1448--1461",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "10",

}

Leader social accounts of subordinates' Unethical behavior : Examining observer reactions to leader social accounts with moral disengagement language. / Dang, Carolyn; Umphress, Elizabeth E.; Mitchell, Marie S.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 102, No. 10, 01.10.2017, p. 1448-1461.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Leader social accounts of subordinates' Unethical behavior

T2 - Examining observer reactions to leader social accounts with moral disengagement language

AU - Dang, Carolyn

AU - Umphress, Elizabeth E.

AU - Mitchell, Marie S.

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - When providing social accounts (Sitkin & Bies, 1993) for the unethical conduct of subordinates, leaders may use language consistent with cognitive strategies described by Bandura (1991, 1999) in his work on moral disengagement. That is, leader's social accounts may reframe or reconstrue subordinates' unethical conduct such that it appears less reprehensible. We predict observers will respond negatively to leaders when they use moral disengagement language within social accounts and, specifically, observers will ostracize these leaders. In addition, we predict that observer moral disengagement propensity moderates this effect, such that the relationship between leaders' use of moral disengagement language within a social account and ostracism is stronger when observer moral disengagement propensity is lower versus higher. Finally, we predict that the reason why observers ostracize the leader is because observers perceive the leader's social account with moral disengagement language as unethical. Thus, perceived leader social account ethicality is predicted to mediate the interaction effect of leader's use of moral disengagement language within social accounts and observer moral disengagement propensity on ostracism. Results from an experiment and field study support our predictions. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

AB - When providing social accounts (Sitkin & Bies, 1993) for the unethical conduct of subordinates, leaders may use language consistent with cognitive strategies described by Bandura (1991, 1999) in his work on moral disengagement. That is, leader's social accounts may reframe or reconstrue subordinates' unethical conduct such that it appears less reprehensible. We predict observers will respond negatively to leaders when they use moral disengagement language within social accounts and, specifically, observers will ostracize these leaders. In addition, we predict that observer moral disengagement propensity moderates this effect, such that the relationship between leaders' use of moral disengagement language within a social account and ostracism is stronger when observer moral disengagement propensity is lower versus higher. Finally, we predict that the reason why observers ostracize the leader is because observers perceive the leader's social account with moral disengagement language as unethical. Thus, perceived leader social account ethicality is predicted to mediate the interaction effect of leader's use of moral disengagement language within social accounts and observer moral disengagement propensity on ostracism. Results from an experiment and field study support our predictions. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021704690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021704690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/apl0000233

DO - 10.1037/apl0000233

M3 - Article

C2 - 28493747

AN - SCOPUS:85021704690

VL - 102

SP - 1448

EP - 1461

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 10

ER -