Leading sectors and leading regions: Economic restructuring and regional inequality in Hungary since 1990

David L. Brown, Bé L.A. Greskovits, Laszlo Kulcsar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines factors accounting for persisting regional inequality in Hungary during the regime change from socialism to a market economy in 1990. We examine the determinants of regional inequality through the lens of leading sector theory which has been used to explain why some ex-socialist countries have done better than others during the transformation. In other words, we ask whether some regions of Hungary are doing better than others for the same reasons that some ex-socialist countries have outperformed their counterparts. We use county level data from the Hungarian Central Statistical Office to examine whether the quantity and types of foreign direct investment counties have received since 1990 are associated with regional inequality in per capita GDP. We find that foreign capitalists concentrate human-capital-intensive investment in already well performing locations because they have similar supply structures to their home economies. We also contend that no measure of institutional modernization is likely to make lagging regions attractive candidates for human-capital-intensive investments in the near future. Hence, regardless of the national state's efforts to target development to lagging areas, or the effectiveness of local institutions, lagging regions are likely to remain underdeveloped. We recommend that future field-based research be conducted to examine the nexus between FDI, the nation state and localities. Unraveling interrelationships between these three political economy sites will expose the causal forces sustaining regional inequalities during post-socialism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)522-542
Number of pages21
JournalInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2007

Fingerprint

Hungary
restructuring
socialism
human capital
socialist state
economics
supply structure
foreign direct investment
nation state
political economy
Gross Domestic Product
modernization
national state
direct investment
market economy
foreign investment
candidacy
regime
determinants
economy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Development
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

@article{88a5860e1bc7435e8610c58fc24ccd61,
title = "Leading sectors and leading regions: Economic restructuring and regional inequality in Hungary since 1990",
abstract = "This article examines factors accounting for persisting regional inequality in Hungary during the regime change from socialism to a market economy in 1990. We examine the determinants of regional inequality through the lens of leading sector theory which has been used to explain why some ex-socialist countries have done better than others during the transformation. In other words, we ask whether some regions of Hungary are doing better than others for the same reasons that some ex-socialist countries have outperformed their counterparts. We use county level data from the Hungarian Central Statistical Office to examine whether the quantity and types of foreign direct investment counties have received since 1990 are associated with regional inequality in per capita GDP. We find that foreign capitalists concentrate human-capital-intensive investment in already well performing locations because they have similar supply structures to their home economies. We also contend that no measure of institutional modernization is likely to make lagging regions attractive candidates for human-capital-intensive investments in the near future. Hence, regardless of the national state's efforts to target development to lagging areas, or the effectiveness of local institutions, lagging regions are likely to remain underdeveloped. We recommend that future field-based research be conducted to examine the nexus between FDI, the nation state and localities. Unraveling interrelationships between these three political economy sites will expose the causal forces sustaining regional inequalities during post-socialism.",
author = "Brown, {David L.} and Greskovits, {B{\'e} L.A.} and Laszlo Kulcsar",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00738.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "522--542",
journal = "International Journal of Urban and Regional Research",
issn = "0309-1317",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Leading sectors and leading regions : Economic restructuring and regional inequality in Hungary since 1990. / Brown, David L.; Greskovits, Bé L.A.; Kulcsar, Laszlo.

In: International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 31, No. 3, 01.09.2007, p. 522-542.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Leading sectors and leading regions

T2 - Economic restructuring and regional inequality in Hungary since 1990

AU - Brown, David L.

AU - Greskovits, Bé L.A.

AU - Kulcsar, Laszlo

PY - 2007/9/1

Y1 - 2007/9/1

N2 - This article examines factors accounting for persisting regional inequality in Hungary during the regime change from socialism to a market economy in 1990. We examine the determinants of regional inequality through the lens of leading sector theory which has been used to explain why some ex-socialist countries have done better than others during the transformation. In other words, we ask whether some regions of Hungary are doing better than others for the same reasons that some ex-socialist countries have outperformed their counterparts. We use county level data from the Hungarian Central Statistical Office to examine whether the quantity and types of foreign direct investment counties have received since 1990 are associated with regional inequality in per capita GDP. We find that foreign capitalists concentrate human-capital-intensive investment in already well performing locations because they have similar supply structures to their home economies. We also contend that no measure of institutional modernization is likely to make lagging regions attractive candidates for human-capital-intensive investments in the near future. Hence, regardless of the national state's efforts to target development to lagging areas, or the effectiveness of local institutions, lagging regions are likely to remain underdeveloped. We recommend that future field-based research be conducted to examine the nexus between FDI, the nation state and localities. Unraveling interrelationships between these three political economy sites will expose the causal forces sustaining regional inequalities during post-socialism.

AB - This article examines factors accounting for persisting regional inequality in Hungary during the regime change from socialism to a market economy in 1990. We examine the determinants of regional inequality through the lens of leading sector theory which has been used to explain why some ex-socialist countries have done better than others during the transformation. In other words, we ask whether some regions of Hungary are doing better than others for the same reasons that some ex-socialist countries have outperformed their counterparts. We use county level data from the Hungarian Central Statistical Office to examine whether the quantity and types of foreign direct investment counties have received since 1990 are associated with regional inequality in per capita GDP. We find that foreign capitalists concentrate human-capital-intensive investment in already well performing locations because they have similar supply structures to their home economies. We also contend that no measure of institutional modernization is likely to make lagging regions attractive candidates for human-capital-intensive investments in the near future. Hence, regardless of the national state's efforts to target development to lagging areas, or the effectiveness of local institutions, lagging regions are likely to remain underdeveloped. We recommend that future field-based research be conducted to examine the nexus between FDI, the nation state and localities. Unraveling interrelationships between these three political economy sites will expose the causal forces sustaining regional inequalities during post-socialism.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35348984546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35348984546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00738.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00738.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:35348984546

VL - 31

SP - 522

EP - 542

JO - International Journal of Urban and Regional Research

JF - International Journal of Urban and Regional Research

SN - 0309-1317

IS - 3

ER -