Learning progressions and teaching sequences: A review and analysis

Richard Duschl, Seungho Maeng, Asli Sezen

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

132 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Our paper is an analytical review of the design, development and reporting of learning progressions and teaching sequences. Research questions are: (1) what criteria are being used to propose a 'hypothetical learning progression/trajectory' and (2) what measurements/evidence are being used to empirically define and refine a 'hypothetical learning progression/trajectory'? Publications from five topic areas are examined: teaching sequences, teaching experiments, didaktiks, learning trajectories in mathematics education and learning progressions in science education. The reviewed publications are drawn from journal special issues, conference reports and monographs. The review is coordinated around four frameworks of Learning Progressions (LP): conceptual domain, disciplinary practices, assessment/measurement and theoretical/guiding conceptions. Our findings and analyses show there is a distinction between the preferred learning pathways that focus on 'Evolutionary LP' models and the less preferred but potentially good LP starting place curriculum coherence focused 'Validation LP' models. We report on the respective features and characteristics for each.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)123-182
Number of pages60
JournalStudies in Science Education
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2011

Fingerprint

Teaching
learning
education
mathematics
curriculum
experiment
science
evidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Cite this

Duschl, Richard ; Maeng, Seungho ; Sezen, Asli. / Learning progressions and teaching sequences : A review and analysis. In: Studies in Science Education. 2011 ; Vol. 47, No. 2. pp. 123-182.
@article{7e440f58335a405bad4038a39290af14,
title = "Learning progressions and teaching sequences: A review and analysis",
abstract = "Our paper is an analytical review of the design, development and reporting of learning progressions and teaching sequences. Research questions are: (1) what criteria are being used to propose a 'hypothetical learning progression/trajectory' and (2) what measurements/evidence are being used to empirically define and refine a 'hypothetical learning progression/trajectory'? Publications from five topic areas are examined: teaching sequences, teaching experiments, didaktiks, learning trajectories in mathematics education and learning progressions in science education. The reviewed publications are drawn from journal special issues, conference reports and monographs. The review is coordinated around four frameworks of Learning Progressions (LP): conceptual domain, disciplinary practices, assessment/measurement and theoretical/guiding conceptions. Our findings and analyses show there is a distinction between the preferred learning pathways that focus on 'Evolutionary LP' models and the less preferred but potentially good LP starting place curriculum coherence focused 'Validation LP' models. We report on the respective features and characteristics for each.",
author = "Richard Duschl and Seungho Maeng and Asli Sezen",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/03057267.2011.604476",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "123--182",
journal = "Studies in Science Education",
issn = "0305-7267",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Learning progressions and teaching sequences : A review and analysis. / Duschl, Richard; Maeng, Seungho; Sezen, Asli.

In: Studies in Science Education, Vol. 47, No. 2, 01.09.2011, p. 123-182.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning progressions and teaching sequences

T2 - A review and analysis

AU - Duschl, Richard

AU - Maeng, Seungho

AU - Sezen, Asli

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - Our paper is an analytical review of the design, development and reporting of learning progressions and teaching sequences. Research questions are: (1) what criteria are being used to propose a 'hypothetical learning progression/trajectory' and (2) what measurements/evidence are being used to empirically define and refine a 'hypothetical learning progression/trajectory'? Publications from five topic areas are examined: teaching sequences, teaching experiments, didaktiks, learning trajectories in mathematics education and learning progressions in science education. The reviewed publications are drawn from journal special issues, conference reports and monographs. The review is coordinated around four frameworks of Learning Progressions (LP): conceptual domain, disciplinary practices, assessment/measurement and theoretical/guiding conceptions. Our findings and analyses show there is a distinction between the preferred learning pathways that focus on 'Evolutionary LP' models and the less preferred but potentially good LP starting place curriculum coherence focused 'Validation LP' models. We report on the respective features and characteristics for each.

AB - Our paper is an analytical review of the design, development and reporting of learning progressions and teaching sequences. Research questions are: (1) what criteria are being used to propose a 'hypothetical learning progression/trajectory' and (2) what measurements/evidence are being used to empirically define and refine a 'hypothetical learning progression/trajectory'? Publications from five topic areas are examined: teaching sequences, teaching experiments, didaktiks, learning trajectories in mathematics education and learning progressions in science education. The reviewed publications are drawn from journal special issues, conference reports and monographs. The review is coordinated around four frameworks of Learning Progressions (LP): conceptual domain, disciplinary practices, assessment/measurement and theoretical/guiding conceptions. Our findings and analyses show there is a distinction between the preferred learning pathways that focus on 'Evolutionary LP' models and the less preferred but potentially good LP starting place curriculum coherence focused 'Validation LP' models. We report on the respective features and characteristics for each.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052601229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052601229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03057267.2011.604476

DO - 10.1080/03057267.2011.604476

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:80052601229

VL - 47

SP - 123

EP - 182

JO - Studies in Science Education

JF - Studies in Science Education

SN - 0305-7267

IS - 2

ER -