Learning scenes from multiple views

Novel views can be recognized more efficiently than learned views

David Waller, Alinda Friedman, Eric Hodgson, Nathan Michael Greenauer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In two experiments, participants were trained to recognize a playground scene from four vantage points and were subsequently asked to recognize the playground from a novel perspective between the four learned viewing perspectives, as well as from the trained perspectives. In both experiments, people recognized the novel view more efficiently than those that they had recently used in order to learn the scene. Additionally, in Experiment 2, participants who viewed a novel stimulus on their very first test trial correctly recognized it more quickly (and also tended to recognize it more accurately) than did participants whose first test trial was a familiar view of the scene. These findings call into question the idea that scenes are recognized by comparing them with single previous experiences, and support a growing body of literature on the existence of psychological mechanisms that combine spatial information from multiple views of a scene.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)90-99
Number of pages10
JournalMemory and Cognition
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

Learning
Psychology
Experiment
Playground
Psychological
Vantage Point
Stimulus

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{82365ec539e24e3795ed3bdfb3642057,
title = "Learning scenes from multiple views: Novel views can be recognized more efficiently than learned views",
abstract = "In two experiments, participants were trained to recognize a playground scene from four vantage points and were subsequently asked to recognize the playground from a novel perspective between the four learned viewing perspectives, as well as from the trained perspectives. In both experiments, people recognized the novel view more efficiently than those that they had recently used in order to learn the scene. Additionally, in Experiment 2, participants who viewed a novel stimulus on their very first test trial correctly recognized it more quickly (and also tended to recognize it more accurately) than did participants whose first test trial was a familiar view of the scene. These findings call into question the idea that scenes are recognized by comparing them with single previous experiences, and support a growing body of literature on the existence of psychological mechanisms that combine spatial information from multiple views of a scene.",
author = "David Waller and Alinda Friedman and Eric Hodgson and Greenauer, {Nathan Michael}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/MC.37.1.90",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "90--99",
journal = "Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0090-502X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

Learning scenes from multiple views : Novel views can be recognized more efficiently than learned views. / Waller, David; Friedman, Alinda; Hodgson, Eric; Greenauer, Nathan Michael.

In: Memory and Cognition, Vol. 37, No. 1, 01.01.2009, p. 90-99.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning scenes from multiple views

T2 - Novel views can be recognized more efficiently than learned views

AU - Waller, David

AU - Friedman, Alinda

AU - Hodgson, Eric

AU - Greenauer, Nathan Michael

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - In two experiments, participants were trained to recognize a playground scene from four vantage points and were subsequently asked to recognize the playground from a novel perspective between the four learned viewing perspectives, as well as from the trained perspectives. In both experiments, people recognized the novel view more efficiently than those that they had recently used in order to learn the scene. Additionally, in Experiment 2, participants who viewed a novel stimulus on their very first test trial correctly recognized it more quickly (and also tended to recognize it more accurately) than did participants whose first test trial was a familiar view of the scene. These findings call into question the idea that scenes are recognized by comparing them with single previous experiences, and support a growing body of literature on the existence of psychological mechanisms that combine spatial information from multiple views of a scene.

AB - In two experiments, participants were trained to recognize a playground scene from four vantage points and were subsequently asked to recognize the playground from a novel perspective between the four learned viewing perspectives, as well as from the trained perspectives. In both experiments, people recognized the novel view more efficiently than those that they had recently used in order to learn the scene. Additionally, in Experiment 2, participants who viewed a novel stimulus on their very first test trial correctly recognized it more quickly (and also tended to recognize it more accurately) than did participants whose first test trial was a familiar view of the scene. These findings call into question the idea that scenes are recognized by comparing them with single previous experiences, and support a growing body of literature on the existence of psychological mechanisms that combine spatial information from multiple views of a scene.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62649086222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62649086222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/MC.37.1.90

DO - 10.3758/MC.37.1.90

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 90

EP - 99

JO - Memory and Cognition

JF - Memory and Cognition

SN - 0090-502X

IS - 1

ER -