TY - JOUR
T1 - Legal Status and Health Care
T2 - Mexican-Origin Children in California, 2001–2014
AU - Oropesa, R. S.
AU - Landale, Nancy S.
AU - Hillemeier, Marianne M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by NICHD Grants 5P01HD062498-04 and R24HD041025.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
PY - 2016/10/1
Y1 - 2016/10/1
N2 - Using restricted data from the 2001–2014 California Health Interview Surveys, this research illuminates the role of legal status in health care among Mexican-origin children. The first objective is to provide a population-level overview of trends in health care access and utilization, along with the legal statuses of parents and children. The second objective is to examine the nature of associations between children’s health care and legal status over time. We identify specific status-based distinctions that matter and investigate how their importance is changing. Despite the continuing significance of child nativity for health care, the descriptive analysis shows that the proportion of Mexican-origin children who are foreign born is declining. This trend suggests a potentially greater role of parental legal status in children’s health care. Logistic regression analyses demonstrate that the importance of parental legal status varies with the health care indicator examined and the inclusion of child nativity in models. Moreover, variation in some aspects of children’s health care coalesced more around parents’ citizenship than documentation status in the past. With one exception, the salience of such distinctions has dissipated over time.
AB - Using restricted data from the 2001–2014 California Health Interview Surveys, this research illuminates the role of legal status in health care among Mexican-origin children. The first objective is to provide a population-level overview of trends in health care access and utilization, along with the legal statuses of parents and children. The second objective is to examine the nature of associations between children’s health care and legal status over time. We identify specific status-based distinctions that matter and investigate how their importance is changing. Despite the continuing significance of child nativity for health care, the descriptive analysis shows that the proportion of Mexican-origin children who are foreign born is declining. This trend suggests a potentially greater role of parental legal status in children’s health care. Logistic regression analyses demonstrate that the importance of parental legal status varies with the health care indicator examined and the inclusion of child nativity in models. Moreover, variation in some aspects of children’s health care coalesced more around parents’ citizenship than documentation status in the past. With one exception, the salience of such distinctions has dissipated over time.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975463392&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84975463392&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11113-016-9400-6
DO - 10.1007/s11113-016-9400-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 27867239
AN - SCOPUS:84975463392
SN - 0167-5923
VL - 35
SP - 651
EP - 684
JO - Population Research and Policy Review
JF - Population Research and Policy Review
IS - 5
ER -