Liberal economics and the institutionalization of sin: Christian and stoic vestiges in economic rationality

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The recognition that ecological problems often extend beyond nation-state boundaries has prompted environmentalists, politicians, and academics to call for and generate problem-solving discourses meant to be global in perspective. Free-market rhetoric has emerged as one of the more prominent of the global discourses, even though the free market's commodification of human beings and nature causes many environmental problems. To discredit this economic rationality, many scholars have compared it to religion. These comparisons are intriguing, but they have lacked the critical analysis necessary to appear as anything more than name-calling. This paper clarifies the definition of religion and uses it to examine the origins of economic rationality's fundamental presupposition - that greedy self-interested competition generates more social benefits than altruistic cooperation - within eighteenth-century Natural Law vs. Ecclesiastical Law debates. Despite economic rationality's adoption of sophisticated empirical methods and mathematical rigor over the past two centuries, it is a religion because it retains vestiges of the Protestant Christian and Stoic beliefs of how social life is governed by supernatural intervention When it uncritically promotes policies based on that presupposition. Recognizing economic rationality is a religion may benefit those who are striving to develop systems of governance based on democratic principles by leading to a greater understanding of economic rationality's normative attraction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-57
Number of pages27
JournalWorldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

institutionalization
rationality
religion
Religion
economics
natural law
empirical method
market
eighteenth century
discourse
critical analysis
social benefits
nation state
environmental impact
politician
rhetoric
institutionalisation
Stoics
Vestiges
Economics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Religious studies
  • Philosophy
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

@article{202407be661a45fca8e8c724e1b3ed46,
title = "Liberal economics and the institutionalization of sin: Christian and stoic vestiges in economic rationality",
abstract = "The recognition that ecological problems often extend beyond nation-state boundaries has prompted environmentalists, politicians, and academics to call for and generate problem-solving discourses meant to be global in perspective. Free-market rhetoric has emerged as one of the more prominent of the global discourses, even though the free market's commodification of human beings and nature causes many environmental problems. To discredit this economic rationality, many scholars have compared it to religion. These comparisons are intriguing, but they have lacked the critical analysis necessary to appear as anything more than name-calling. This paper clarifies the definition of religion and uses it to examine the origins of economic rationality's fundamental presupposition - that greedy self-interested competition generates more social benefits than altruistic cooperation - within eighteenth-century Natural Law vs. Ecclesiastical Law debates. Despite economic rationality's adoption of sophisticated empirical methods and mathematical rigor over the past two centuries, it is a religion because it retains vestiges of the Protestant Christian and Stoic beliefs of how social life is governed by supernatural intervention When it uncritically promotes policies based on that presupposition. Recognizing economic rationality is a religion may benefit those who are striving to develop systems of governance based on democratic principles by leading to a greater understanding of economic rationality's normative attraction.",
author = "Glenna, {Leland Luther}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1163/156853502760184586",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "31--57",
journal = "Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion",
issn = "1363-5247",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Liberal economics and the institutionalization of sin

T2 - Christian and stoic vestiges in economic rationality

AU - Glenna, Leland Luther

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - The recognition that ecological problems often extend beyond nation-state boundaries has prompted environmentalists, politicians, and academics to call for and generate problem-solving discourses meant to be global in perspective. Free-market rhetoric has emerged as one of the more prominent of the global discourses, even though the free market's commodification of human beings and nature causes many environmental problems. To discredit this economic rationality, many scholars have compared it to religion. These comparisons are intriguing, but they have lacked the critical analysis necessary to appear as anything more than name-calling. This paper clarifies the definition of religion and uses it to examine the origins of economic rationality's fundamental presupposition - that greedy self-interested competition generates more social benefits than altruistic cooperation - within eighteenth-century Natural Law vs. Ecclesiastical Law debates. Despite economic rationality's adoption of sophisticated empirical methods and mathematical rigor over the past two centuries, it is a religion because it retains vestiges of the Protestant Christian and Stoic beliefs of how social life is governed by supernatural intervention When it uncritically promotes policies based on that presupposition. Recognizing economic rationality is a religion may benefit those who are striving to develop systems of governance based on democratic principles by leading to a greater understanding of economic rationality's normative attraction.

AB - The recognition that ecological problems often extend beyond nation-state boundaries has prompted environmentalists, politicians, and academics to call for and generate problem-solving discourses meant to be global in perspective. Free-market rhetoric has emerged as one of the more prominent of the global discourses, even though the free market's commodification of human beings and nature causes many environmental problems. To discredit this economic rationality, many scholars have compared it to religion. These comparisons are intriguing, but they have lacked the critical analysis necessary to appear as anything more than name-calling. This paper clarifies the definition of religion and uses it to examine the origins of economic rationality's fundamental presupposition - that greedy self-interested competition generates more social benefits than altruistic cooperation - within eighteenth-century Natural Law vs. Ecclesiastical Law debates. Despite economic rationality's adoption of sophisticated empirical methods and mathematical rigor over the past two centuries, it is a religion because it retains vestiges of the Protestant Christian and Stoic beliefs of how social life is governed by supernatural intervention When it uncritically promotes policies based on that presupposition. Recognizing economic rationality is a religion may benefit those who are striving to develop systems of governance based on democratic principles by leading to a greater understanding of economic rationality's normative attraction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846240274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846240274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/156853502760184586

DO - 10.1163/156853502760184586

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33846240274

VL - 6

SP - 31

EP - 57

JO - Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion

JF - Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion

SN - 1363-5247

IS - 1

ER -