Limits of the flesh: The role of reflection in David Abram's ecophenomenology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

David Abram's The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human-World convincingly demonstrates the contribution that phenomenology, especially the work of Maurice Merleau-Ponty, can make to environmental theory. But Abram's account suffers from several limitations that are explored here. First, although Abram intends to develop an "organic" account of thinking as grounded in the sensible world, his descriptions castigate reflection and reverse, rather than rethinking, the traditional hierarchy between mind and body. Second, Abram's emphasis on perceptual reciprocity as the basis for an environmental ethic underplays the importance of the symbolic level of our interaction with others. Merleau-Ponty's later work, in particular his account of the reversibility of flesh, offers a fruitful alternative to Abram's methodology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)155-170
Number of pages16
JournalEnvironmental Ethics
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005

Fingerprint

reciprocity
methodology
Flesh
Interaction
Human World
Language
Spell
Methodology
Environmental Ethics
Maurice Merleau-Ponty
Reversibility
Phenomenology
world
environmental ethics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Philosophy

Cite this

@article{1b3bb6515fa142ad89a3763fca62f120,
title = "Limits of the flesh: The role of reflection in David Abram's ecophenomenology",
abstract = "David Abram's The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human-World convincingly demonstrates the contribution that phenomenology, especially the work of Maurice Merleau-Ponty, can make to environmental theory. But Abram's account suffers from several limitations that are explored here. First, although Abram intends to develop an {"}organic{"} account of thinking as grounded in the sensible world, his descriptions castigate reflection and reverse, rather than rethinking, the traditional hierarchy between mind and body. Second, Abram's emphasis on perceptual reciprocity as the basis for an environmental ethic underplays the importance of the symbolic level of our interaction with others. Merleau-Ponty's later work, in particular his account of the reversibility of flesh, offers a fruitful alternative to Abram's methodology.",
author = "{Toadvine, Jr.}, {Theodore A.}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5840/enviroethics200527228",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "155--170",
journal = "Environmental Ethics",
issn = "0163-4275",
publisher = "Environmental Philosophy Inc",
number = "2",

}

Limits of the flesh : The role of reflection in David Abram's ecophenomenology. / Toadvine, Jr., Theodore A.

In: Environmental Ethics, Vol. 27, No. 2, 01.01.2005, p. 155-170.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Limits of the flesh

T2 - The role of reflection in David Abram's ecophenomenology

AU - Toadvine, Jr., Theodore A.

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - David Abram's The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human-World convincingly demonstrates the contribution that phenomenology, especially the work of Maurice Merleau-Ponty, can make to environmental theory. But Abram's account suffers from several limitations that are explored here. First, although Abram intends to develop an "organic" account of thinking as grounded in the sensible world, his descriptions castigate reflection and reverse, rather than rethinking, the traditional hierarchy between mind and body. Second, Abram's emphasis on perceptual reciprocity as the basis for an environmental ethic underplays the importance of the symbolic level of our interaction with others. Merleau-Ponty's later work, in particular his account of the reversibility of flesh, offers a fruitful alternative to Abram's methodology.

AB - David Abram's The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human-World convincingly demonstrates the contribution that phenomenology, especially the work of Maurice Merleau-Ponty, can make to environmental theory. But Abram's account suffers from several limitations that are explored here. First, although Abram intends to develop an "organic" account of thinking as grounded in the sensible world, his descriptions castigate reflection and reverse, rather than rethinking, the traditional hierarchy between mind and body. Second, Abram's emphasis on perceptual reciprocity as the basis for an environmental ethic underplays the importance of the symbolic level of our interaction with others. Merleau-Ponty's later work, in particular his account of the reversibility of flesh, offers a fruitful alternative to Abram's methodology.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=19944377765&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=19944377765&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5840/enviroethics200527228

DO - 10.5840/enviroethics200527228

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:19944377765

VL - 27

SP - 155

EP - 170

JO - Environmental Ethics

JF - Environmental Ethics

SN - 0163-4275

IS - 2

ER -