Abstract
The DSM-5 includes two measures to assess dimensions of personality pathology (Personality Inventory for DSM-5; PID-5) and cross-cutting symptoms of psychopathology (DSM-5 Cross-cutting Symptom Measure; CCS). Few studies have evaluated these measures in an ecologically valid context. Participants (N = 248, student sample) completed self-report versions of the DSM-5 measures, and then completed a two-week daily diary of internalizing and externalizing outcomes. The CCS scales evidenced convergent and discriminant validity with these outcomes, PID-5 Negative Affectivity and Detachment were related to internalizing outcomes, and PID-5 Antagonism was related to externalizing outcomes. We also demonstrated the benefit of linking static dimensions to temporally-dynamic processes by examining how PID-5/CCS dimensions moderated the within-person associations among daily cognitive distortions and internalizing and externalizing outcomes.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 103852 |
| Journal | Journal of Research in Personality |
| Volume | 82 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 1 2019 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Social Psychology
- Psychology(all)
Cite this
}
Linking dimensions and dynamics in psychopathology research : An example using DSM-5 instruments. / Roche, Michael J.; Pincus, Aaron Lee; Cole, Paige E.
In: Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 82, 103852, 01.10.2019.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Linking dimensions and dynamics in psychopathology research
T2 - An example using DSM-5 instruments
AU - Roche, Michael J.
AU - Pincus, Aaron Lee
AU - Cole, Paige E.
PY - 2019/10/1
Y1 - 2019/10/1
N2 - The DSM-5 includes two measures to assess dimensions of personality pathology (Personality Inventory for DSM-5; PID-5) and cross-cutting symptoms of psychopathology (DSM-5 Cross-cutting Symptom Measure; CCS). Few studies have evaluated these measures in an ecologically valid context. Participants (N = 248, student sample) completed self-report versions of the DSM-5 measures, and then completed a two-week daily diary of internalizing and externalizing outcomes. The CCS scales evidenced convergent and discriminant validity with these outcomes, PID-5 Negative Affectivity and Detachment were related to internalizing outcomes, and PID-5 Antagonism was related to externalizing outcomes. We also demonstrated the benefit of linking static dimensions to temporally-dynamic processes by examining how PID-5/CCS dimensions moderated the within-person associations among daily cognitive distortions and internalizing and externalizing outcomes.
AB - The DSM-5 includes two measures to assess dimensions of personality pathology (Personality Inventory for DSM-5; PID-5) and cross-cutting symptoms of psychopathology (DSM-5 Cross-cutting Symptom Measure; CCS). Few studies have evaluated these measures in an ecologically valid context. Participants (N = 248, student sample) completed self-report versions of the DSM-5 measures, and then completed a two-week daily diary of internalizing and externalizing outcomes. The CCS scales evidenced convergent and discriminant validity with these outcomes, PID-5 Negative Affectivity and Detachment were related to internalizing outcomes, and PID-5 Antagonism was related to externalizing outcomes. We also demonstrated the benefit of linking static dimensions to temporally-dynamic processes by examining how PID-5/CCS dimensions moderated the within-person associations among daily cognitive distortions and internalizing and externalizing outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070236742&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070236742&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103852
DO - 10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103852
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85070236742
VL - 82
JO - Journal of Research in Personality
JF - Journal of Research in Personality
SN - 0092-6566
M1 - 103852
ER -