Literary history after literary dominance

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

The various pronouncements of the nation's dissolution seem to have been premature. Literary history is still very much within the nation, especially if one considers the realm of the middle- and lowbrow, or indeed the vast swaths of genre fiction. What has changed in literary history is the position of literature itself. The discipline of literary study (whether one thinks of it as literary history or literary criticism) institutionalized itself during a period of literary dominance. Now that that dominance is over-now that the field of narrative aesthetic culture includes television, film, and video games, and now that those genres dominate not only markets but the forms of representativity that used to belong almost exclusively to literature-what is the future for literary studies, either as a scholarly discipline or as an institutional field?.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)479-494
Number of pages16
JournalModern Language Quarterly
Volume80
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2019

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Literature and Literary Theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Literary history after literary dominance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this