Living donor liver transplantation in patients with portal vein thrombosis: A survey and review of technical issues

Zakiyah Kadry, Nazia Selzner, Alexander Handschin, Beat Müllhaupt, Eberhard L. Renner, Pierre Alain Clavien

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Unlike cadaveric liver transplantation, current attitudes in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) quote increased risk factors in the potential recipient such as retransplantation, multiple previous surgeries, or preexisting recipient portal vein thrombosis (PVT) as absolute or relative contraindications to this procedure. Methods. An international survey was performed to examine the attitude of transplant teams relative to LDLT in the setting of preexisting PVT in the potential recipient. A questionnaire was sent to a total of 80 transplant centers performing LDLT in the United States, Europe, Canada, Japan, Southeast Asia, and Australia. Results. A response was obtained from 47 transplant centers (59% response rate). This included 2146 LDLT procedures that combined both left and right lobe allografts. The incidence of acute preexisting recipient PVT was 18 (0.8%) and of chronic PVT was 26 (1.2%). Thrombectomy was performed in 28 (64%), a jump graft in 13 (29.5%), and a combination of both thrombectomy and a jump graft in 2 (4.5%) cases. With reference to the presence of preexisting PVT in the potential recipient, 5 centers considered this to be an absolute contraindication (10.7%), 24 centers as a relative contraindication (51%), and 18 as not being a contraindication (38.3%) to LDLT. Conclusions. The overall response to our questionnaire reflected a cautious attitude within the transplant community. Ethical criteria pertaining to risk undertaken by a healthy donor in situations of higher recipient morbidity risk does seem to impact on the decision to undertake LDLT in this group of patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)696-701
Number of pages6
JournalTransplantation
Volume74
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 15 2002

Fingerprint

Living Donors
Portal Vein
Liver Transplantation
Thrombosis
Transplants
Thrombectomy
Southeastern Asia
Surveys and Questionnaires
Canada
Allografts
Japan
Tissue Donors
Morbidity
Incidence

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Transplantation

Cite this

Kadry, Zakiyah ; Selzner, Nazia ; Handschin, Alexander ; Müllhaupt, Beat ; Renner, Eberhard L. ; Clavien, Pierre Alain. / Living donor liver transplantation in patients with portal vein thrombosis : A survey and review of technical issues. In: Transplantation. 2002 ; Vol. 74, No. 5. pp. 696-701.
@article{309a09b0fe2f48718a4f66e6dba4b464,
title = "Living donor liver transplantation in patients with portal vein thrombosis: A survey and review of technical issues",
abstract = "Background. Unlike cadaveric liver transplantation, current attitudes in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) quote increased risk factors in the potential recipient such as retransplantation, multiple previous surgeries, or preexisting recipient portal vein thrombosis (PVT) as absolute or relative contraindications to this procedure. Methods. An international survey was performed to examine the attitude of transplant teams relative to LDLT in the setting of preexisting PVT in the potential recipient. A questionnaire was sent to a total of 80 transplant centers performing LDLT in the United States, Europe, Canada, Japan, Southeast Asia, and Australia. Results. A response was obtained from 47 transplant centers (59{\%} response rate). This included 2146 LDLT procedures that combined both left and right lobe allografts. The incidence of acute preexisting recipient PVT was 18 (0.8{\%}) and of chronic PVT was 26 (1.2{\%}). Thrombectomy was performed in 28 (64{\%}), a jump graft in 13 (29.5{\%}), and a combination of both thrombectomy and a jump graft in 2 (4.5{\%}) cases. With reference to the presence of preexisting PVT in the potential recipient, 5 centers considered this to be an absolute contraindication (10.7{\%}), 24 centers as a relative contraindication (51{\%}), and 18 as not being a contraindication (38.3{\%}) to LDLT. Conclusions. The overall response to our questionnaire reflected a cautious attitude within the transplant community. Ethical criteria pertaining to risk undertaken by a healthy donor in situations of higher recipient morbidity risk does seem to impact on the decision to undertake LDLT in this group of patients.",
author = "Zakiyah Kadry and Nazia Selzner and Alexander Handschin and Beat M{\"u}llhaupt and Renner, {Eberhard L.} and Clavien, {Pierre Alain}",
year = "2002",
month = "9",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1097/00007890-200209150-00018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "696--701",
journal = "Transplantation",
issn = "0041-1337",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

Living donor liver transplantation in patients with portal vein thrombosis : A survey and review of technical issues. / Kadry, Zakiyah; Selzner, Nazia; Handschin, Alexander; Müllhaupt, Beat; Renner, Eberhard L.; Clavien, Pierre Alain.

In: Transplantation, Vol. 74, No. 5, 15.09.2002, p. 696-701.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Living donor liver transplantation in patients with portal vein thrombosis

T2 - A survey and review of technical issues

AU - Kadry, Zakiyah

AU - Selzner, Nazia

AU - Handschin, Alexander

AU - Müllhaupt, Beat

AU - Renner, Eberhard L.

AU - Clavien, Pierre Alain

PY - 2002/9/15

Y1 - 2002/9/15

N2 - Background. Unlike cadaveric liver transplantation, current attitudes in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) quote increased risk factors in the potential recipient such as retransplantation, multiple previous surgeries, or preexisting recipient portal vein thrombosis (PVT) as absolute or relative contraindications to this procedure. Methods. An international survey was performed to examine the attitude of transplant teams relative to LDLT in the setting of preexisting PVT in the potential recipient. A questionnaire was sent to a total of 80 transplant centers performing LDLT in the United States, Europe, Canada, Japan, Southeast Asia, and Australia. Results. A response was obtained from 47 transplant centers (59% response rate). This included 2146 LDLT procedures that combined both left and right lobe allografts. The incidence of acute preexisting recipient PVT was 18 (0.8%) and of chronic PVT was 26 (1.2%). Thrombectomy was performed in 28 (64%), a jump graft in 13 (29.5%), and a combination of both thrombectomy and a jump graft in 2 (4.5%) cases. With reference to the presence of preexisting PVT in the potential recipient, 5 centers considered this to be an absolute contraindication (10.7%), 24 centers as a relative contraindication (51%), and 18 as not being a contraindication (38.3%) to LDLT. Conclusions. The overall response to our questionnaire reflected a cautious attitude within the transplant community. Ethical criteria pertaining to risk undertaken by a healthy donor in situations of higher recipient morbidity risk does seem to impact on the decision to undertake LDLT in this group of patients.

AB - Background. Unlike cadaveric liver transplantation, current attitudes in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) quote increased risk factors in the potential recipient such as retransplantation, multiple previous surgeries, or preexisting recipient portal vein thrombosis (PVT) as absolute or relative contraindications to this procedure. Methods. An international survey was performed to examine the attitude of transplant teams relative to LDLT in the setting of preexisting PVT in the potential recipient. A questionnaire was sent to a total of 80 transplant centers performing LDLT in the United States, Europe, Canada, Japan, Southeast Asia, and Australia. Results. A response was obtained from 47 transplant centers (59% response rate). This included 2146 LDLT procedures that combined both left and right lobe allografts. The incidence of acute preexisting recipient PVT was 18 (0.8%) and of chronic PVT was 26 (1.2%). Thrombectomy was performed in 28 (64%), a jump graft in 13 (29.5%), and a combination of both thrombectomy and a jump graft in 2 (4.5%) cases. With reference to the presence of preexisting PVT in the potential recipient, 5 centers considered this to be an absolute contraindication (10.7%), 24 centers as a relative contraindication (51%), and 18 as not being a contraindication (38.3%) to LDLT. Conclusions. The overall response to our questionnaire reflected a cautious attitude within the transplant community. Ethical criteria pertaining to risk undertaken by a healthy donor in situations of higher recipient morbidity risk does seem to impact on the decision to undertake LDLT in this group of patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037106252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037106252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00007890-200209150-00018

DO - 10.1097/00007890-200209150-00018

M3 - Article

C2 - 12352888

AN - SCOPUS:0037106252

VL - 74

SP - 696

EP - 701

JO - Transplantation

JF - Transplantation

SN - 0041-1337

IS - 5

ER -