Local autonomy versus state constraints

Balancing evolution and creationism in U.S. high schools

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Do state curricular standards and examinations constrain the behavior of public school teachers? More specifically, do they interfere with teachers' responsiveness to local district preferences? We explore these questions in the highly contested arena of instruction in evolutionary biology. Drawing upon an original national survey of high school biology teachers, we find that their classroom practices conform to community preferences. This responsiveness occurs largely through a process of assortative employment. However, we show that teachers are less responsive to public opinion when state curricular standards are supported by high-stakes testing. We therefore offer a general model of how policy implementation can be influenced by local community sentiment and, more generally, how the architecture of public policy can attenuate responsiveness to local public opinion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)610-635
Number of pages26
JournalPublius
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2011

Fingerprint

autonomy
public opinion
teacher
school
biology teacher
local public
policy implementation
community
biology
public policy
district
instruction
classroom
examination

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Cite this

@article{26c171458ba84ffda34bcff8a6a68592,
title = "Local autonomy versus state constraints: Balancing evolution and creationism in U.S. high schools",
abstract = "Do state curricular standards and examinations constrain the behavior of public school teachers? More specifically, do they interfere with teachers' responsiveness to local district preferences? We explore these questions in the highly contested arena of instruction in evolutionary biology. Drawing upon an original national survey of high school biology teachers, we find that their classroom practices conform to community preferences. This responsiveness occurs largely through a process of assortative employment. However, we show that teachers are less responsive to public opinion when state curricular standards are supported by high-stakes testing. We therefore offer a general model of how policy implementation can be influenced by local community sentiment and, more generally, how the architecture of public policy can attenuate responsiveness to local public opinion.",
author = "Berkman, {Michael Barth} and Eric Plutzer",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/publius/pjr008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "610--635",
journal = "Publius",
issn = "0048-5950",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

Local autonomy versus state constraints : Balancing evolution and creationism in U.S. high schools. / Berkman, Michael Barth; Plutzer, Eric.

In: Publius, Vol. 41, No. 4, 01.10.2011, p. 610-635.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Local autonomy versus state constraints

T2 - Balancing evolution and creationism in U.S. high schools

AU - Berkman, Michael Barth

AU - Plutzer, Eric

PY - 2011/10/1

Y1 - 2011/10/1

N2 - Do state curricular standards and examinations constrain the behavior of public school teachers? More specifically, do they interfere with teachers' responsiveness to local district preferences? We explore these questions in the highly contested arena of instruction in evolutionary biology. Drawing upon an original national survey of high school biology teachers, we find that their classroom practices conform to community preferences. This responsiveness occurs largely through a process of assortative employment. However, we show that teachers are less responsive to public opinion when state curricular standards are supported by high-stakes testing. We therefore offer a general model of how policy implementation can be influenced by local community sentiment and, more generally, how the architecture of public policy can attenuate responsiveness to local public opinion.

AB - Do state curricular standards and examinations constrain the behavior of public school teachers? More specifically, do they interfere with teachers' responsiveness to local district preferences? We explore these questions in the highly contested arena of instruction in evolutionary biology. Drawing upon an original national survey of high school biology teachers, we find that their classroom practices conform to community preferences. This responsiveness occurs largely through a process of assortative employment. However, we show that teachers are less responsive to public opinion when state curricular standards are supported by high-stakes testing. We therefore offer a general model of how policy implementation can be influenced by local community sentiment and, more generally, how the architecture of public policy can attenuate responsiveness to local public opinion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053509323&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053509323&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/publius/pjr008

DO - 10.1093/publius/pjr008

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 610

EP - 635

JO - Publius

JF - Publius

SN - 0048-5950

IS - 4

ER -