Local exchange competition in early US network development: considerations for developing countries

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines the claim that competition between the Bell system and independent telephone companies, and not AT&T's regulated monopoly, was responsible for the rapid growth in telephone penetration in the United States. A mathematical model is developed to test if competition contributed to network expansion, when alternative explanations such as diffusion and economic growth are also taken into account. The model is estimated with time series data on telephone penetration in the US from 1876 to 1982, using both Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Feasible Generalized Least Squares (FGLS). The results indicate that local exchange competition is indeed a significant influence on increase in telephone penetration, even in the early stages of network development. This has clear policy implications for the current transition to competition in developing countries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)375-387
Number of pages13
JournalTelecommunications Policy
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1999

Fingerprint

Telephone
Developing countries
telephone
developing country
monopoly
time series
Time series
economic growth
Mathematical models
Economics
Industry

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Information Systems
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

@article{b36b4fe618704bdbaaff4b049230fecc,
title = "Local exchange competition in early US network development: considerations for developing countries",
abstract = "This paper examines the claim that competition between the Bell system and independent telephone companies, and not AT&T's regulated monopoly, was responsible for the rapid growth in telephone penetration in the United States. A mathematical model is developed to test if competition contributed to network expansion, when alternative explanations such as diffusion and economic growth are also taken into account. The model is estimated with time series data on telephone penetration in the US from 1876 to 1982, using both Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Feasible Generalized Least Squares (FGLS). The results indicate that local exchange competition is indeed a significant influence on increase in telephone penetration, even in the early stages of network development. This has clear policy implications for the current transition to competition in developing countries.",
author = "Jayakar, {Krishna P.}",
year = "1999",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/S0308-5961(99)00020-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "375--387",
journal = "Telecommunications Policy",
issn = "0308-5961",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "5",

}

Local exchange competition in early US network development : considerations for developing countries. / Jayakar, Krishna P.

In: Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 23, No. 5, 06.1999, p. 375-387.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Local exchange competition in early US network development

T2 - considerations for developing countries

AU - Jayakar, Krishna P.

PY - 1999/6

Y1 - 1999/6

N2 - This paper examines the claim that competition between the Bell system and independent telephone companies, and not AT&T's regulated monopoly, was responsible for the rapid growth in telephone penetration in the United States. A mathematical model is developed to test if competition contributed to network expansion, when alternative explanations such as diffusion and economic growth are also taken into account. The model is estimated with time series data on telephone penetration in the US from 1876 to 1982, using both Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Feasible Generalized Least Squares (FGLS). The results indicate that local exchange competition is indeed a significant influence on increase in telephone penetration, even in the early stages of network development. This has clear policy implications for the current transition to competition in developing countries.

AB - This paper examines the claim that competition between the Bell system and independent telephone companies, and not AT&T's regulated monopoly, was responsible for the rapid growth in telephone penetration in the United States. A mathematical model is developed to test if competition contributed to network expansion, when alternative explanations such as diffusion and economic growth are also taken into account. The model is estimated with time series data on telephone penetration in the US from 1876 to 1982, using both Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Feasible Generalized Least Squares (FGLS). The results indicate that local exchange competition is indeed a significant influence on increase in telephone penetration, even in the early stages of network development. This has clear policy implications for the current transition to competition in developing countries.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033138319&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033138319&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0308-5961(99)00020-8

DO - 10.1016/S0308-5961(99)00020-8

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033138319

VL - 23

SP - 375

EP - 387

JO - Telecommunications Policy

JF - Telecommunications Policy

SN - 0308-5961

IS - 5

ER -