Locating existing best management practices within a watershed: The value of multiple methods

Caitlin Grady, Adam P. Reimer, Jane Frankenberger, Linda Stalker Prokopy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

There is an increasing need to document the impacts of conservation-related best management practices (BMPs) on water quality within a watershed. However, this impact analysis depends upon accurate geospatial locations of existing practices, which are difficult to obtain. This study demonstrates and evaluates three different methods for obtaining geospatial information for BMPs. This study was focused on the Eagle Creek Watershed, a mixed use watershed in central Indiana. We obtained geospatial information for BMPs through government records, producer interviews, and remote-sensing aerial photo interpretation. Aerial photos were also used to validate the government records and producer interviews. This study shows the variation in results obtained from the three sources of information as well as the benefits and drawbacks of each method. Using only one method for obtaining BMP information can be incomplete, and this study demonstrates how multiple methods can be used for the most accurate picture.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)883-895
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of the American Water Resources Association
Volume49
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2013

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Ecology
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Earth-Surface Processes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Locating existing best management practices within a watershed: The value of multiple methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this