Locked on course: Hydro-Quebec's commitment to mega-projects

James Maxwell, Lee Jennifer, Forrest Scott Briscoe, Ann Stewart, Tatsujiro Suzuki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Large organizations often escalate their commitments to mega-project development, even after evidence becomes available of adverse environmental consequences or lack of economic feasibility. This escalation of commitment transcends both sectorial and national boundaries. Preeminent examples include controversial nuclear projects in the United States, hydroelectric projects like the Three Gorges Dam in China, and transport projects like the Chunnel and the Concorde. In this article, we examine the experience of Hydro-Quebec with the Great Whale Project. We argue that Hydro-Quebec escalated its commitment even after serious questions emerged about its environmental impacts and economic feasibility, because of (1) its earlier success with large projects, (2) its engineering culture's norms for consistency, and (3) its role in the government's desire for economic and cultural autonomy. Finally, we discuss the changes that are necessary to break commitments to such projects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19-38
Number of pages20
JournalEnvironmental Impact Assessment Review
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997

Fingerprint

commitment
economics
escalation
environmental economics
gorge
autonomy
whale
development project
project
environmental impact
dam
engineering
China
lack
evidence
experience

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Ecology
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Maxwell, James ; Jennifer, Lee ; Briscoe, Forrest Scott ; Stewart, Ann ; Suzuki, Tatsujiro. / Locked on course : Hydro-Quebec's commitment to mega-projects. In: Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 1997 ; Vol. 17, No. 1. pp. 19-38.
@article{172c04dc5aba419cb515dbe64c67e436,
title = "Locked on course: Hydro-Quebec's commitment to mega-projects",
abstract = "Large organizations often escalate their commitments to mega-project development, even after evidence becomes available of adverse environmental consequences or lack of economic feasibility. This escalation of commitment transcends both sectorial and national boundaries. Preeminent examples include controversial nuclear projects in the United States, hydroelectric projects like the Three Gorges Dam in China, and transport projects like the Chunnel and the Concorde. In this article, we examine the experience of Hydro-Quebec with the Great Whale Project. We argue that Hydro-Quebec escalated its commitment even after serious questions emerged about its environmental impacts and economic feasibility, because of (1) its earlier success with large projects, (2) its engineering culture's norms for consistency, and (3) its role in the government's desire for economic and cultural autonomy. Finally, we discuss the changes that are necessary to break commitments to such projects.",
author = "James Maxwell and Lee Jennifer and Briscoe, {Forrest Scott} and Ann Stewart and Tatsujiro Suzuki",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00073-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "19--38",
journal = "Environmental Impact Assessment Review",
issn = "0195-9255",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Locked on course : Hydro-Quebec's commitment to mega-projects. / Maxwell, James; Jennifer, Lee; Briscoe, Forrest Scott; Stewart, Ann; Suzuki, Tatsujiro.

In: Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 17, No. 1, 01.01.1997, p. 19-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Locked on course

T2 - Hydro-Quebec's commitment to mega-projects

AU - Maxwell, James

AU - Jennifer, Lee

AU - Briscoe, Forrest Scott

AU - Stewart, Ann

AU - Suzuki, Tatsujiro

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - Large organizations often escalate their commitments to mega-project development, even after evidence becomes available of adverse environmental consequences or lack of economic feasibility. This escalation of commitment transcends both sectorial and national boundaries. Preeminent examples include controversial nuclear projects in the United States, hydroelectric projects like the Three Gorges Dam in China, and transport projects like the Chunnel and the Concorde. In this article, we examine the experience of Hydro-Quebec with the Great Whale Project. We argue that Hydro-Quebec escalated its commitment even after serious questions emerged about its environmental impacts and economic feasibility, because of (1) its earlier success with large projects, (2) its engineering culture's norms for consistency, and (3) its role in the government's desire for economic and cultural autonomy. Finally, we discuss the changes that are necessary to break commitments to such projects.

AB - Large organizations often escalate their commitments to mega-project development, even after evidence becomes available of adverse environmental consequences or lack of economic feasibility. This escalation of commitment transcends both sectorial and national boundaries. Preeminent examples include controversial nuclear projects in the United States, hydroelectric projects like the Three Gorges Dam in China, and transport projects like the Chunnel and the Concorde. In this article, we examine the experience of Hydro-Quebec with the Great Whale Project. We argue that Hydro-Quebec escalated its commitment even after serious questions emerged about its environmental impacts and economic feasibility, because of (1) its earlier success with large projects, (2) its engineering culture's norms for consistency, and (3) its role in the government's desire for economic and cultural autonomy. Finally, we discuss the changes that are necessary to break commitments to such projects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030615811&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030615811&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00073-X

DO - 10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00073-X

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0030615811

VL - 17

SP - 19

EP - 38

JO - Environmental Impact Assessment Review

JF - Environmental Impact Assessment Review

SN - 0195-9255

IS - 1

ER -