Loners, Colleagues, or Peers? Assessing the Social Organization of Radicalization

Thomas J. Holt, Joshua D. Freilich, Steven M. Chermak, Colleen Mills, Jason Silva

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study explores the utility of a sociological model of social organization developed by Best and Luckenbill (1994) to classify the radicalization processes of terrorists (i.e., extremist perpetrators who engaged in ideologically motivated acts of violence) who are usually categorized as loner or lone wolf attackers. There are several organizational frameworks used to define or classify violent acts performed by individuals who may or may not have ties to extremist groups, but these studies largely ignore the role of social relationships in radicalization and the extent to which they inform our knowledge of terror. To address this gap, we apply the Best and Luckenbill model of social organization using a qualitative analysis of three case studies of four lone actor or small cell terrorists. The findings demonstrate lone actors are not always true loners in the context of radicalization, and highlights the ways that the Internet and social ties foster the radicalization processes of terror.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)83-105
Number of pages23
JournalAmerican Journal of Criminal Justice
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Fingerprint

radicalization
organization
terrorism
violence
Internet
Group

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Law

Cite this

Holt, Thomas J. ; Freilich, Joshua D. ; Chermak, Steven M. ; Mills, Colleen ; Silva, Jason. / Loners, Colleagues, or Peers? Assessing the Social Organization of Radicalization. In: American Journal of Criminal Justice. 2019 ; Vol. 44, No. 1. pp. 83-105.
@article{7bc07a526ecf4b71a59458f68adea585,
title = "Loners, Colleagues, or Peers? Assessing the Social Organization of Radicalization",
abstract = "This study explores the utility of a sociological model of social organization developed by Best and Luckenbill (1994) to classify the radicalization processes of terrorists (i.e., extremist perpetrators who engaged in ideologically motivated acts of violence) who are usually categorized as loner or lone wolf attackers. There are several organizational frameworks used to define or classify violent acts performed by individuals who may or may not have ties to extremist groups, but these studies largely ignore the role of social relationships in radicalization and the extent to which they inform our knowledge of terror. To address this gap, we apply the Best and Luckenbill model of social organization using a qualitative analysis of three case studies of four lone actor or small cell terrorists. The findings demonstrate lone actors are not always true loners in the context of radicalization, and highlights the ways that the Internet and social ties foster the radicalization processes of terror.",
author = "Holt, {Thomas J.} and Freilich, {Joshua D.} and Chermak, {Steven M.} and Colleen Mills and Jason Silva",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12103-018-9439-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "83--105",
journal = "American Journal of Criminal Justice",
issn = "1066-2316",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

Loners, Colleagues, or Peers? Assessing the Social Organization of Radicalization. / Holt, Thomas J.; Freilich, Joshua D.; Chermak, Steven M.; Mills, Colleen; Silva, Jason.

In: American Journal of Criminal Justice, Vol. 44, No. 1, 01.02.2019, p. 83-105.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Loners, Colleagues, or Peers? Assessing the Social Organization of Radicalization

AU - Holt, Thomas J.

AU - Freilich, Joshua D.

AU - Chermak, Steven M.

AU - Mills, Colleen

AU - Silva, Jason

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - This study explores the utility of a sociological model of social organization developed by Best and Luckenbill (1994) to classify the radicalization processes of terrorists (i.e., extremist perpetrators who engaged in ideologically motivated acts of violence) who are usually categorized as loner or lone wolf attackers. There are several organizational frameworks used to define or classify violent acts performed by individuals who may or may not have ties to extremist groups, but these studies largely ignore the role of social relationships in radicalization and the extent to which they inform our knowledge of terror. To address this gap, we apply the Best and Luckenbill model of social organization using a qualitative analysis of three case studies of four lone actor or small cell terrorists. The findings demonstrate lone actors are not always true loners in the context of radicalization, and highlights the ways that the Internet and social ties foster the radicalization processes of terror.

AB - This study explores the utility of a sociological model of social organization developed by Best and Luckenbill (1994) to classify the radicalization processes of terrorists (i.e., extremist perpetrators who engaged in ideologically motivated acts of violence) who are usually categorized as loner or lone wolf attackers. There are several organizational frameworks used to define or classify violent acts performed by individuals who may or may not have ties to extremist groups, but these studies largely ignore the role of social relationships in radicalization and the extent to which they inform our knowledge of terror. To address this gap, we apply the Best and Luckenbill model of social organization using a qualitative analysis of three case studies of four lone actor or small cell terrorists. The findings demonstrate lone actors are not always true loners in the context of radicalization, and highlights the ways that the Internet and social ties foster the radicalization processes of terror.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045440480&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045440480&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12103-018-9439-5

DO - 10.1007/s12103-018-9439-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85045440480

VL - 44

SP - 83

EP - 105

JO - American Journal of Criminal Justice

JF - American Journal of Criminal Justice

SN - 1066-2316

IS - 1

ER -