Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound does not enhance distraction callus in a rabbit model

Kenneth Taylor, Bahman Rafiee, John E. Tis, Nozumu Inoue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound has been reported to have a positive effect when applied during the consolidation phase of distraction osteogenesis and bone transportation, but the optimal application time has not been determined. We used a rabbit model to determine whether low-intensity pulsed ultrasound applied during the distraction and early consolidation phases of tibial lengthening would have a positive effect on regenerated bone formation. Radiographic analysis showed no differences in regenerated callus area or in percent of callus mineralization between treated and control tibias immediately after distraction or at 1, 2, or 3 weeks after distraction. Similarly, we observed no differences in structural stiffness or maximal torque to failure at 1.5 or 3 weeks after distraction. We detected no differences in bone mineral appositional rates or percent tissue composition measured histologically between groups. Our data do not support the application of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound to regenerated bone during distraction osteogenesis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)237-245
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Issue number459
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Fingerprint

Bony Callus
Distraction Osteogenesis
Rabbits
Bone and Bones
Torque
Tibia
Osteogenesis
Minerals
Ultrasonic Waves

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

@article{53596ba96c164ae197e989c81fa14a93,
title = "Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound does not enhance distraction callus in a rabbit model",
abstract = "Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound has been reported to have a positive effect when applied during the consolidation phase of distraction osteogenesis and bone transportation, but the optimal application time has not been determined. We used a rabbit model to determine whether low-intensity pulsed ultrasound applied during the distraction and early consolidation phases of tibial lengthening would have a positive effect on regenerated bone formation. Radiographic analysis showed no differences in regenerated callus area or in percent of callus mineralization between treated and control tibias immediately after distraction or at 1, 2, or 3 weeks after distraction. Similarly, we observed no differences in structural stiffness or maximal torque to failure at 1.5 or 3 weeks after distraction. We detected no differences in bone mineral appositional rates or percent tissue composition measured histologically between groups. Our data do not support the application of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound to regenerated bone during distraction osteogenesis.",
author = "Kenneth Taylor and Bahman Rafiee and Tis, {John E.} and Nozumu Inoue",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BLO.0b013e31803c75b4",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "237--245",
journal = "Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research",
issn = "0009-921X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "459",

}

Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound does not enhance distraction callus in a rabbit model. / Taylor, Kenneth; Rafiee, Bahman; Tis, John E.; Inoue, Nozumu.

In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 459, 01.01.2007, p. 237-245.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound does not enhance distraction callus in a rabbit model

AU - Taylor, Kenneth

AU - Rafiee, Bahman

AU - Tis, John E.

AU - Inoue, Nozumu

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound has been reported to have a positive effect when applied during the consolidation phase of distraction osteogenesis and bone transportation, but the optimal application time has not been determined. We used a rabbit model to determine whether low-intensity pulsed ultrasound applied during the distraction and early consolidation phases of tibial lengthening would have a positive effect on regenerated bone formation. Radiographic analysis showed no differences in regenerated callus area or in percent of callus mineralization between treated and control tibias immediately after distraction or at 1, 2, or 3 weeks after distraction. Similarly, we observed no differences in structural stiffness or maximal torque to failure at 1.5 or 3 weeks after distraction. We detected no differences in bone mineral appositional rates or percent tissue composition measured histologically between groups. Our data do not support the application of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound to regenerated bone during distraction osteogenesis.

AB - Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound has been reported to have a positive effect when applied during the consolidation phase of distraction osteogenesis and bone transportation, but the optimal application time has not been determined. We used a rabbit model to determine whether low-intensity pulsed ultrasound applied during the distraction and early consolidation phases of tibial lengthening would have a positive effect on regenerated bone formation. Radiographic analysis showed no differences in regenerated callus area or in percent of callus mineralization between treated and control tibias immediately after distraction or at 1, 2, or 3 weeks after distraction. Similarly, we observed no differences in structural stiffness or maximal torque to failure at 1.5 or 3 weeks after distraction. We detected no differences in bone mineral appositional rates or percent tissue composition measured histologically between groups. Our data do not support the application of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound to regenerated bone during distraction osteogenesis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249950463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249950463&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31803c75b4

DO - 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31803c75b4

M3 - Article

SP - 237

EP - 245

JO - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

JF - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

SN - 0009-921X

IS - 459

ER -