Lung Cancer Care Before and After Medicare Eligibility

Marco D. Huesch, Michael K. Ong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Uninsured and underinsured near-elderly may not have timely investigation, diagnosis, or care of cancer. Prior studies suggest Medicare eligibility confers significant and substantial reductions in mortality and increases in health service utilization. We compared 2245 patients diagnosed with lung cancer at ages 64.5 to 65 years and 2512 patients aged 65 to 65.5 years, with 2492 patients aged 65.5 to 66 years (controls) in 2000 to 2005. Compared with controls, patients diagnosed with lung cancer before Medicare eligibility had no statistically significant differences in cancer stage, time to treatment, type of treatment, and survival. Study power was sufficient to exclude mortality reductions and health service utilization changes of the magnitude found in prior work, suggesting that typically, appropriate lung cancer care may be sought and delivered regardless of insurance status.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
Volume53
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Medicare
Lung Neoplasms
Health Services
Insurance Coverage
Mortality
Neoplasms
Survival
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Health Policy

Cite this

@article{ef405f1af87e49d6bb0e305d1430a057,
title = "Lung Cancer Care Before and After Medicare Eligibility",
abstract = "Uninsured and underinsured near-elderly may not have timely investigation, diagnosis, or care of cancer. Prior studies suggest Medicare eligibility confers significant and substantial reductions in mortality and increases in health service utilization. We compared 2245 patients diagnosed with lung cancer at ages 64.5 to 65 years and 2512 patients aged 65 to 65.5 years, with 2492 patients aged 65.5 to 66 years (controls) in 2000 to 2005. Compared with controls, patients diagnosed with lung cancer before Medicare eligibility had no statistically significant differences in cancer stage, time to treatment, type of treatment, and survival. Study power was sufficient to exclude mortality reductions and health service utilization changes of the magnitude found in prior work, suggesting that typically, appropriate lung cancer care may be sought and delivered regardless of insurance status.",
author = "Huesch, {Marco D.} and Ong, {Michael K.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0046958016647301",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
journal = "Inquiry",
issn = "0046-9580",
publisher = "Excellus Health Plan",

}

Lung Cancer Care Before and After Medicare Eligibility. / Huesch, Marco D.; Ong, Michael K.

In: Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing, Vol. 53, 01.01.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lung Cancer Care Before and After Medicare Eligibility

AU - Huesch, Marco D.

AU - Ong, Michael K.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Uninsured and underinsured near-elderly may not have timely investigation, diagnosis, or care of cancer. Prior studies suggest Medicare eligibility confers significant and substantial reductions in mortality and increases in health service utilization. We compared 2245 patients diagnosed with lung cancer at ages 64.5 to 65 years and 2512 patients aged 65 to 65.5 years, with 2492 patients aged 65.5 to 66 years (controls) in 2000 to 2005. Compared with controls, patients diagnosed with lung cancer before Medicare eligibility had no statistically significant differences in cancer stage, time to treatment, type of treatment, and survival. Study power was sufficient to exclude mortality reductions and health service utilization changes of the magnitude found in prior work, suggesting that typically, appropriate lung cancer care may be sought and delivered regardless of insurance status.

AB - Uninsured and underinsured near-elderly may not have timely investigation, diagnosis, or care of cancer. Prior studies suggest Medicare eligibility confers significant and substantial reductions in mortality and increases in health service utilization. We compared 2245 patients diagnosed with lung cancer at ages 64.5 to 65 years and 2512 patients aged 65 to 65.5 years, with 2492 patients aged 65.5 to 66 years (controls) in 2000 to 2005. Compared with controls, patients diagnosed with lung cancer before Medicare eligibility had no statistically significant differences in cancer stage, time to treatment, type of treatment, and survival. Study power was sufficient to exclude mortality reductions and health service utilization changes of the magnitude found in prior work, suggesting that typically, appropriate lung cancer care may be sought and delivered regardless of insurance status.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979798537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979798537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0046958016647301

DO - 10.1177/0046958016647301

M3 - Article

VL - 53

JO - Inquiry

JF - Inquiry

SN - 0046-9580

ER -