Macropartisanship and macroideology in the sophisticated electorate

Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, Suzanna Linn

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are many reasons to believe that political parties' fortunes and the ideological preferences of the electorate are tied together. Yet existing evidence finds no relationship between trends in the partisan and ideological identifications of the American electorate (Box-Steffensmeier, Knight, and Sigelman 1998). We argue that a portion of the electorate organizes political debate in terms of liberal and conservative referents and, in turn, links ideological and partisan identifications over time. Evidence from CBS News and New York Times survey data affirms the conclusion that for the more sophisticated portion of the electorate, partisan and ideological trends are mutually reinforcing in both the long and the short run. These groups are also more likely to vote than less politically sophisticated groups, so the incentives for politicians to link popular ideological sentiment with partisanship are strong; the people who pay attention to politics and put them in office (or kick them out) are the same people who connect ideology and partisanship.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)232-248
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Politics
Volume63
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

trend
evidence
politician
voter
news
ideology
Group
incentive
politics
time

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M. ; Linn, Suzanna. / Macropartisanship and macroideology in the sophisticated electorate. In: Journal of Politics. 2001 ; Vol. 63, No. 1. pp. 232-248.
@article{2fbc1287f4404645b5825a61a7885e65,
title = "Macropartisanship and macroideology in the sophisticated electorate",
abstract = "There are many reasons to believe that political parties' fortunes and the ideological preferences of the electorate are tied together. Yet existing evidence finds no relationship between trends in the partisan and ideological identifications of the American electorate (Box-Steffensmeier, Knight, and Sigelman 1998). We argue that a portion of the electorate organizes political debate in terms of liberal and conservative referents and, in turn, links ideological and partisan identifications over time. Evidence from CBS News and New York Times survey data affirms the conclusion that for the more sophisticated portion of the electorate, partisan and ideological trends are mutually reinforcing in both the long and the short run. These groups are also more likely to vote than less politically sophisticated groups, so the incentives for politicians to link popular ideological sentiment with partisanship are strong; the people who pay attention to politics and put them in office (or kick them out) are the same people who connect ideology and partisanship.",
author = "Box-Steffensmeier, {Janet M.} and Suzanna Linn",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/0022-3816.00066",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "232--248",
journal = "Journal of Politics",
issn = "0022-3816",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

Macropartisanship and macroideology in the sophisticated electorate. / Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M.; Linn, Suzanna.

In: Journal of Politics, Vol. 63, No. 1, 01.01.2001, p. 232-248.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Macropartisanship and macroideology in the sophisticated electorate

AU - Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M.

AU - Linn, Suzanna

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - There are many reasons to believe that political parties' fortunes and the ideological preferences of the electorate are tied together. Yet existing evidence finds no relationship between trends in the partisan and ideological identifications of the American electorate (Box-Steffensmeier, Knight, and Sigelman 1998). We argue that a portion of the electorate organizes political debate in terms of liberal and conservative referents and, in turn, links ideological and partisan identifications over time. Evidence from CBS News and New York Times survey data affirms the conclusion that for the more sophisticated portion of the electorate, partisan and ideological trends are mutually reinforcing in both the long and the short run. These groups are also more likely to vote than less politically sophisticated groups, so the incentives for politicians to link popular ideological sentiment with partisanship are strong; the people who pay attention to politics and put them in office (or kick them out) are the same people who connect ideology and partisanship.

AB - There are many reasons to believe that political parties' fortunes and the ideological preferences of the electorate are tied together. Yet existing evidence finds no relationship between trends in the partisan and ideological identifications of the American electorate (Box-Steffensmeier, Knight, and Sigelman 1998). We argue that a portion of the electorate organizes political debate in terms of liberal and conservative referents and, in turn, links ideological and partisan identifications over time. Evidence from CBS News and New York Times survey data affirms the conclusion that for the more sophisticated portion of the electorate, partisan and ideological trends are mutually reinforcing in both the long and the short run. These groups are also more likely to vote than less politically sophisticated groups, so the incentives for politicians to link popular ideological sentiment with partisanship are strong; the people who pay attention to politics and put them in office (or kick them out) are the same people who connect ideology and partisanship.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035586086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035586086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/0022-3816.00066

DO - 10.1111/0022-3816.00066

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:0035586086

VL - 63

SP - 232

EP - 248

JO - Journal of Politics

JF - Journal of Politics

SN - 0022-3816

IS - 1

ER -