Making human junk: Child labor as a health issue in the progressive era

Alan V. Derickson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The adverse health effects of work on approximately 2 million employed children troubled many in the United States during the early 20th century. Advocates of reform initially built a rationale for protective legislation primarily from informal, lay observations of the broad developmental outcomes of premature employment. In this endeavor, they projected a dismal scenario of impending national deterioration. This argument received strong criticism for the inadequacy of its corroborating evidence. In response, Progressive reformers emphasized the specific, measurable consequences of particular occupations. Increasingly, liberal advocates of the exclusion of boys and girls from the work force drew upon statistical compilations of occupational injuries and illnesses diagnosed by physicians. Despite their turn toward scientism, Progressives remained somewhat ambivalent about the sufficiency of quantitative data alone to achieve their aims.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1280-1290
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican journal of public health
Volume82
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992

Fingerprint

Occupational Injuries
Occupational Diseases
Legislation
Occupations
Physicians
Health

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{cd2c941073114758ad25715065c2f2a1,
title = "Making human junk: Child labor as a health issue in the progressive era",
abstract = "The adverse health effects of work on approximately 2 million employed children troubled many in the United States during the early 20th century. Advocates of reform initially built a rationale for protective legislation primarily from informal, lay observations of the broad developmental outcomes of premature employment. In this endeavor, they projected a dismal scenario of impending national deterioration. This argument received strong criticism for the inadequacy of its corroborating evidence. In response, Progressive reformers emphasized the specific, measurable consequences of particular occupations. Increasingly, liberal advocates of the exclusion of boys and girls from the work force drew upon statistical compilations of occupational injuries and illnesses diagnosed by physicians. Despite their turn toward scientism, Progressives remained somewhat ambivalent about the sufficiency of quantitative data alone to achieve their aims.",
author = "Derickson, {Alan V.}",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2105/AJPH.82.9.1280",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "1280--1290",
journal = "American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association Inc.",
number = "9",

}

Making human junk : Child labor as a health issue in the progressive era. / Derickson, Alan V.

In: American journal of public health, Vol. 82, No. 9, 01.01.1992, p. 1280-1290.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making human junk

T2 - Child labor as a health issue in the progressive era

AU - Derickson, Alan V.

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - The adverse health effects of work on approximately 2 million employed children troubled many in the United States during the early 20th century. Advocates of reform initially built a rationale for protective legislation primarily from informal, lay observations of the broad developmental outcomes of premature employment. In this endeavor, they projected a dismal scenario of impending national deterioration. This argument received strong criticism for the inadequacy of its corroborating evidence. In response, Progressive reformers emphasized the specific, measurable consequences of particular occupations. Increasingly, liberal advocates of the exclusion of boys and girls from the work force drew upon statistical compilations of occupational injuries and illnesses diagnosed by physicians. Despite their turn toward scientism, Progressives remained somewhat ambivalent about the sufficiency of quantitative data alone to achieve their aims.

AB - The adverse health effects of work on approximately 2 million employed children troubled many in the United States during the early 20th century. Advocates of reform initially built a rationale for protective legislation primarily from informal, lay observations of the broad developmental outcomes of premature employment. In this endeavor, they projected a dismal scenario of impending national deterioration. This argument received strong criticism for the inadequacy of its corroborating evidence. In response, Progressive reformers emphasized the specific, measurable consequences of particular occupations. Increasingly, liberal advocates of the exclusion of boys and girls from the work force drew upon statistical compilations of occupational injuries and illnesses diagnosed by physicians. Despite their turn toward scientism, Progressives remained somewhat ambivalent about the sufficiency of quantitative data alone to achieve their aims.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026712123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026712123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.82.9.1280

DO - 10.2105/AJPH.82.9.1280

M3 - Review article

C2 - 1503173

AN - SCOPUS:0026712123

VL - 82

SP - 1280

EP - 1290

JO - American Journal of Public Health

JF - American Journal of Public Health

SN - 0090-0036

IS - 9

ER -